Youth visions in a changing climate: Emerging lessons from using immersive and arts-based methods for strengthening community-engaged research with urban youth
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Despite increasing efforts, youth perspectives remain largely excluded from decision- making processes concerning their future and the social-ecological challenges they are set to inherit. While youth are a critical and powerful force for social change, many youths in underserved communities have limited access to appropriate information on the root causes and consequences of environmental change, in addition to an array of other complex social injustices. To address this, we embarked on a participatory action research process which focused on democratising research, science and the arts by facilitating experiential, immersive learning opportunities with the intention of eventually co-producing artifacts (in the form of participatory murals) in public spaces to facilitate longer term engagement with human nature futures. This article outlines and shares reflections on our process and offers insights for future engagement activities that seek to mobilise youth imaginaries and agency. We found participants were better engaged when conversations were (1) facilitated by other participants; (2) were outdoors and centred on public art; and (3) were happening in parallel with a hands-on activity. This contrasted with asking interview-type questions, or asking participants to write down their answers, which felt more like a test than a conversation, minimising participation. Key learnings included: the need to co-develop knowledge around enhancing climate literacy that is based on local realities; that multiple capacities and hives of activity already exist in communities and need to be mobilised and not built; that creative visioning and futuring can help identify options for change; and that many youths are seeking creative, immersive and safe spaces for co-learning and connection. Initiatives that aim to engage diverse voices should therefore be well- resourced so as to carefully co-design processes that start by acknowledging contextual differences and capacities within those contexts, and co-create immersive dialogues, in order to move away from test-like engagements which perpetuate power imbalances and discourage participation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit articles to this journal from 31st March 2014 for publication, agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
For Volume 6 (2013) and before, the following copyright applied:
Articles published by UTSePress are protected by copyright which is retained by the authors who assert their moral rights. Authors control translation and reproduction rights to their works published by UTSePress. UTSePress publications are copyright and all rights are reserved worldwide. Downloads of specific portions of them are permitted for personal use only, not for commercial use or resale. Permissions to reprint or use any materials should be directed to UTSePress.
References
Allen, M. ed., 2017. The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. Sage Publications.
Bai, X., Dawson, R.J., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Delgado, G.C., Barau, A.S., Dhakal, S., Dodman, D., Leonardsen, L., Masson-Delmotte, V., Roberts, D.C. and Schultz, S., 2018. Six research priorities for cities and climate change. Nature 555: 23-25. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-02409-z
Ballard, H.L. and Belsky, J.M., 2013. Participatory action research and environmental learning: implications for resilient forests and communities. In Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems (pp. 152-168). Routledge.
Bentz, J. and O’Brien, K., 2019. Art for Change: transformative learning and youth empowerment in a changing climate. Elem Sci Anth 7 (1): 52. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.390
Brownlee, M. T. J, R. B. Powell, and J. C. Hallo. 2013. A Review of the Foundational Processes that Influence Beliefs in Climate Change: Opportunities for Environmental Education Research. Environmental Education Research 19 (1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.683389
Coombes, B et al. 2014. Indigenous geographies III: Methodological innovation and the unsettling of participatory research. Progress in Human Geography, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 845–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513514723
Du Toit, M.J., Cilliers, S.S., Dallimer, M., Goddard, M., Guenat, S. and Cornelius, S.F., 2018. Urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, pp.249-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.06.001
Elmqvist, T., Andersson, E., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., Olsson, P., Gaffney, O., Takeuchi, K. and Folke, C., 2019. Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nature sustainability, 2(4), pp.267-273. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0250-1
Galafassi, D., Tàbara, J.D., Heras, M., Iles, A., Locke, K.A. and Milkoreit, M., 2018. Restoring our senses, restoring the Earth. Fostering imaginative capacities through the arts for envisioning climate transformations. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 6. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.330
Harlan, M.A., 2016. Constructing Youth: Reflecting on Defining Youth and Impact on Methods. School Libraries Worldwide, 22(2). http://doi: 10.14265.22.2.01.
Haverkamp, J., 2021. Where's the love?: Recentring Indigenous and feminist ethics of care for engaged climate research. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 14(2), pp.1-15. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.318599507980280
IPBES. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 56 pages. https://ipbes.net/global-assessment
IUCN-EA-QUANTIS, 2020, National Guidance for plastic pollution hotspotting and shaping action, Country report South Africa. https://www.iucn.org/sites/default/files/content/documents/2021/south_africa_-_national_guidance_for_plastic_pollution_hotspotting_and_shaping_action.pdf
Keeler, B.L., Hamel, P., McPhearson, T., Hamann, M.H., Donahue, M.L., Prado, K.A.M., Arkema, K.K., Bratman, G.N., Brauman, K.A., Finlay, J.C. and Guerry, A.D., 2019. Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature. Nature Sustainability, 2(1), pp.29-38. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-018-0202-1
Leck, H., Sutherland, C., Scott, D., & Oelofse, G. (2011). Social and cultural barriers to adaptation implementation: The case of South Africa. In Masters, L. & Duff, L. (Eds.). Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation implementation in southern Africa (pp. 61–88). Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa.
Lotz-Sisitka, H., Wals, A.E., Kronlid, D. and McGarry, D., 2015. Transformative, transgressive social learning: Rethinking higher education pedagogy in times of systemic global dysfunction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, pp.73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.018
Macintyre, T., Lotz-Sisitka, H., Wals, A., Vogel, C. and Tassone, V., 2018. Towards transformative social learning on the path to 1.5 degrees. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, pp.80-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.003
Meerow, S. and Newell, J.P., 2019. Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why?. Urban Geography, 40(3), pp.309-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
Mitchell, L.E., Lin, J.C., Bowling, D.R., Pataki, D.E., Strong, C., Schauer, A.J., Bares, R., Bush, S.E., Stephens, B.B., Mendoza, D. and Mallia, D., 2018. Long-term urban carbon dioxide observations reveal spatial and temporal dynamics related to urban characteristics and growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(12), pp.2912-2917. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702393115
Nagendra, H., Bai, X., Brondizio, E.S. and Lwasa, S., 2018. The urban south and the predicament of global sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 1(7), pp.341-349. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-018-0101-5
Nkula-Wenz, L., 2019. Worlding Cape Town by design: Encounters with creative cityness. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(3), pp.581-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18796503
O'Farrell, P., Anderson, P., Culwick, C., Currie, P., Kavonic, J., McClure, A., Ngenda, G., Sinnott, E., Sitas, N., Washbourne, C.L. and Audouin, M., 2019. Towards resilient African cities: Shared challenges and opportunities towards the retention and maintenance of ecological infrastructure. Global Sustainability, 2. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2019.16
Pereira, L., Sitas, N., Ravera, F., Jimenez-Aceituno, A., Merrie, A., Kapuscinski, A.R., Locke, K.A. and Moore, M.L., 2019. Building capacities for transformative change towards sustainability: Imagination in Intergovernmental Science-Policy Scenario Processes. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 7. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.374
Pörtner, HO, et al. 2022, Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. IPCC, Netherlands. https://edepot.wur.nl/565644
Rousell, D. and Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. 2019. A systematic review of climate change education: giving children and young people a ‘voice’ and a ‘hand’ in redressing climate change. Children's Geographies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1614532
Reyers, B., Nel, J.L., O’Farrell, P.J., Sitas, N. and Nel, D.C., 2015. Navigating complexity through knowledge coproduction: Mainstreaming ecosystem services into disaster risk reduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(24), pp.7362-7368. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414374112
Salemink, O., Bregnbæk, S. and Hirslund, D.V., 2018. Introduction: youth, subjectivity and Utopia–ethnographic perspectives from the Global South. Identities, 25(2), pp.125-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2017.1400280
Shackleton, C.M. and Gwedla, N., 2021. The legacy effects of colonial and apartheid imprints on urban greening in South Africa: Spaces, species, and suitability. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, p.579813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.579813
Sitas, N., Reyers, B., Cundill, G., Prozesky, H.E., Nel, J.L. and Esler, K.J., 2016. Fostering collaboration for knowledge and action in disaster management in South Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 19, pp.94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.12.007
Sitas, R., 2020, June. Becoming Otherwise: Artful Urban Enquiry. In Urban Forum 31(2):157-175. Springer Netherlands. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12132-020-09387-4
Sitas, R. and Pieterse, E., 2013. Democratic renovations and affective political imaginaries. Third Text, 27(3), pp.327-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528822.2013.798183
Sitas, N., Selomane, O., Hamann, M. and Gajjar, S.P.S., 2021. Towards equitable urban resilience in the Global South within a context of planning and management. In Urban Ecology in the Global South (pp. 325-345). Springer, Cham.
STATS SA 2021. Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS) for the first quarter of 2022 found online at www.stastsa.gov.za.
Temper, L., McGarry, D. and Weber, L., 2019. From academic to political rigour: insights from the ‘tarot’ of transgressive research. Ecological Economics, 164, p.106379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106379
UN Habitat (2020) World Cities report 2020, found online at: https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/10/wcr_2020_report.pdf
UNICEF. 2017. Generation 2030 Africa 20.0. Prioritizing investments in children to reap the demographic dividend found online at: www.unicef.org/publications/index_101219.html
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2018. The World’s Cities in 2018—Data Booklet (ST/ESA/ SER.A/417)
Venter, Z.S., Shackleton, C.M., Van Staden, F., Selomane, O. and Masterson, V.A., 2020. Green Apartheid: Urban green infrastructure remains unequally distributed across income and race geographies in South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203, p.103889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103889
Ziervogel, G., 2019. Building transformative capacity for adaptation planning and implementation that works for the urban poor: Insights from South Africa. Ambio, 48(5), pp.494-506. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-018-1141-9