Beyond 'Definitional Anarchy': A Latent Class Analysis of Institutional Definitions of Community Engagement

Main Article Content

Andrew Pearl
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-5570
Tanvi Padalkar
Emily Locke
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5458-7212
Diana Quito
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9335-6588
Henry R. Cunningham
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5344-2035

Abstract

The Carnegie Foundation’s Elective Classification for Community Engagement was first awarded in 2006. As of the 2024 cycle, 368 institutions held the classification. At the time of this research, the American Council on Education (ACE) hosted the Carnegie Elective Classifications. We used latent class analysis to create a typology of four definitions with varying levels of emphasis placed on values like collaboration, mutual benefit and connections to scholarship. The resultant typology offers a framework for understanding how institutions communicate their values related to community engagement. Our findings provide opportunities for practical guidance and reflective opportunities for leaders seeking to institutionalise community engagement.

Article Details

Section

Research articles (Refereed)

References

Albritton, T. J. (2012). Educating Our Own: The Historical Legacy of HBCUs and Their Relevance for Educating a New Generation of Leaders. The Urban Review, 44(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-012-0202-9
American Council on Education. (n.d.-a). Access for researchers. Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved April 22, 2025, from https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/elective-classifications/community-engagement/researcher-access/
American Council on Education. (n.d.-b). The elective classification for community engagement. Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved June 10, 2024, from https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/elective-classifications/community-engagement/
Anderson, N., Cousins, G., Farrow, T., Fox, C., Hall, R., Hammelman, C., Joy, C., Kilmer, R., Nilsson, I., Racine, E., Terrell, D., & White, B. (2025). Building impactful community-university partnerships through a shared power approach. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.54656/jces.v18i1.573
Avila, M. (2018). Transformative civic engagement through community organizing. Stylus.
Bandy, J., Price, M. F., Clayton, P. H., Metzker, J., Nigro, G., Stanlick, S., Etheridge Woodson, S., Bartel, A., & Gale, S. (2018). Democratically Engaged Assessment: Reimagining the Purposes and Practices of Assessment in Community Engagement. Imagining America. https://imaginingamerica.org/democratically-engaged-assessment-reimagining-the-purposes-and-practices-of-assessment-in-community-engagement/
Beaulieu, M., Breton, M., & Brousselle, A. (2018). Conceptualizing 20 years of engaged scholarship: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 13(2), e0193201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193201
Birch, E., Perry, D. C., & Taylor, Jr., H. L. (2013). Universities as Anchor Institutions. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(3), Article 3.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 1(1), 11–20.
Bringle, R. C., Clayton, P., & Price, M. (2009). Partnerships in service learning and civic engagement. Partnerships: A Journal of Service-Learning and Civic Engagement, 1(1), Article 1.
Clayton, P. H., Camo-Biogradlija, J., Kniffin, L. E., Price, M. F., Bringle, R. G., & Pier, A. A. (2022). The Transformational Relationship Evaluation Scale II (TRES II) Reflection Framework: Version 2. IUPUI ScholarWorks. https://doi.org/10.7912/zy6w-xj66
Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis. Wiley & Sons.
Davis, K. L., Kliewer, B. W., & Nicolaides, A. (2017). Power and reciprocity in partnerships: Deliberative civic engagement and transformative learning in community-engaged scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21(1), Article 1.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience & education. Simon and Schuster.
Doberneck, D. M., Glass, C. R., & Schweitzer, J. (2010). From rhetoric to reality: A typology of publically engaged scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 14(4), 5–35.
Dostilio, L. D. (Ed.). (2017). The community engagement professional in higher education: A competency model for an emerging field. Stylus Publishing, LLC. https://campuscompact.presswarehouse.com/browse/book/9781945459030/The-Community-Engagement-Professional-in-Higher-Education
Driscoll, A. (2008). Carnegie’s Community-Engagement Classification: Intentions and insights. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.1.38-41
Driscoll, A. (2009). Carnegie’s new community engagement classification: Affirming higher education’s role in community. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(147), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.353
Enos, S., & Morton, K. (2003). Developing a theory and practice of campus community partnerships. In B. Jacoby (Ed.), Building partnerships for service-learning (1st ed, pp. 20–41). Jossey-Bass.
Farner, K. (2019). Institutionalizing community engagement in higher education: A case study of processes toward engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 23(2), Article 2.
Fitzgerald, H. E., Bruns, K., Sonka, S. T., Furco, A., & Swanson, L. (2012). The centrality of engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(3), Article 3.
Furco, A., Weerts, D., Burton, L., & Kent, K. (2009). Assessment rubric for institutionalizing community engagement in higher education. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/213717
Gasman, M. (2009, October 11). Minority-serving colleges deserve more respect. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/minority-serving-colleges-deserve-more-respect/
Gavazzi, S. M., & Gee, E. G. (2018). Land-grant universities for the future: Higher education for the public good. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gelmon, S. B., Holland, B., & Spring, A. (2018). Assessing service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and techniques. Campus Compact.
Giles, D. E. (2008). Understanding an emerging field of scholarship: Toward a research agenda for engaged, public scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(2), Article 1.
Himmelman, A. T. (2001). On coalitions and the transformation of power relations: Collaborative betterment and collaborative empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010334831330
Hoeveler, J. D. (1976). The university and the social gospel: The intellectual origins of the “Wisconsin Idea.” The Wisconsin Magazine of History, 59(4), 282–298.
Holland, B. (1997). Analyzing institutional commitment to service: A model of key organizational factors. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 30–41.
Hotaling, L., Lichtenwalner, C. S., McDonnell, J. D., O’Connell, K., & Ferraro, C. (2024). The ARIS Broader Impacts Toolkit: An online guide to support Broader Impact project development and evaluation for researchers and BI professionals. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.54656/jces.v17i2.644
Hungerford, T., & Solon, G. (1987). Sheepskin effects in the returns to education. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 175. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937919
Janke, E., Jenkins, I., Quan, M., & Saltmarsh, J. (2023). We’re talking about process: The primacy of relationship and epistemology in defining community-engaged scholarship in promotion and tenure policy. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsl.2734
Janke, E., Quan, M., Jenkins, I., & Saltmarsh, J. (2023). Persistence and proliferation: Integrating community-engaged scholarship language into 59 departments, seven units, and one university’s academic promotion and tenure policies. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsl.2537
Key, K. D., Furr-Holden, D., Lewis, E. Y., Cunningham, R., Zimmerman, M. A., Johnson-Lawrence, V., & Selig, S. (2019). The continuum of community engagement in research: A roadmap for understanding and assessing progress. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 13(4), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2019.0064
Kniffin, L., Camo-Biogradlija, J., Price, M. F., Kohl, E., Dickovick, A. D. C., Williams, J., Goodwin, J., Johnson, K. V., Clayton, P. H., & Bringle, R. G. (2020). Relationships and partnerships in community–campus engagement: Evolving inquiry and practice. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.37333/001c.18586
Kowalkowski, B., Lloyd Frieson, J., & Phillips, J. L. (2022). Community engagement at Tribal Land-Grant Institutions: A Tribal approach to reimagining the university-community relationship. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.54656/jces.v14i3.49
Linzer, D. A., & Lewis, J. B. (2011). poLCA: An R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(10), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i10
McLean, J. E., & Behringer, B. A. (2008). Establishing and evaluating equitable partnerships. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 1(1), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.54656/NYQP1665
Morphew, C. C., & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778934
O’Meara, K. (2011). Inside the panopticon: Studying academic reward systems. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 26, pp. 161–220). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0702-3_5
O’Meara, K., Lounder, A., & Hodges, A. (2013). University leaders’ use of episodic power to support faculty community engagement. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 19(2), 5–20.
Pearl, A., & Christensen, R. K. (2017a). First-year student motivations for service-learning: An application of the volunteer functions inventory. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 23(2), 66–82.
Pearl, A., & Christensen, R. K. (2017b). First-year student motivations for service-learning: An exploratory investigation of minority student perceptions. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21(4), 117–137.
Pearl, A., Jones-Friedrichs, C., Ward, E., Cunningham, H. C., Azordegan, J. M., Cruz, T., Deas, F., Locke, E., Mitchell, T. D., Padalkar, T., Quito, D., & White, C. C. (in review). The Carnegie Elective Classification: A methodological guide for community engagement research. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement.
Pearl, A., Ward, E., Janke, E., Rios, M., & Eatman, T. K. (in review). Recognizing the value of community-engaged scholarship in institutional policies and practices. Journal of Participatory Research Methods.
Post, M. A., Ward, E., Longo, N. V., & Saltmarsh, J. A. (Eds.). (2016). Publicly engaged scholars: Next generation engagement and the future of higher education (First edition). Stylus Publishing LLC.
Quito, D., Locke, E., Cunningham, H. R., & Pearl, A. (in review). Signaling critical community engagement: Exploring definitions from the 2020 and 2024 Carnegie Classification data. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Rankin, J. C., Pearl, A. J., Jorre, T. J. de S., McGrath, M. M., Dyer, S., Sheriff, S., Armitage, R., Ruediger, K., Jere, A., Zafar, S., Sedres, S., & Chaudhary, D. (2022). Delving into institutional diversity messaging: A cross-institutional analysis of student and faculty interpretations of undergraduate experiences of equity, diversity, and inclusion in university websites. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 10. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.10
Reddix, R. (2022). A new era for social change and community engagement in higher education. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.54656/IKTA8275
Saichaie, K., & Morphew, C. C. (2014). What college and university websites reveal about the purposes of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 499–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777338
Saltmarsh, J., & Johnson, M. B. (2018). The Elective Carnegie Community Engagement Classification: Constructing a successful application for first-time and re-classification applicants. Campus Compact.
Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Conceptualization of the scholarship of engagement in higher education: A strategic review, 1996–2006. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(1), Article 1.
Sandmann, L. R. (2019). Placing scholarly engagement “on the desk.” Campus Compact.
Sinha, P., Calfee, C. S., & Delucchi, K. L. (2021). Practitioner’s guide to latent class analysis: Methodological considerations and common pitfalls. Critical Care Medicine, 49(1), e63–e79. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004710
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Stanton, T. K. (2012). New times demand new scholarship II: Research universities and civic engagement: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(4), Article 4.
Sturm, S., Eatman, T. K., Saltmarsh, J., & Bush, A. (2011). Full participation: Building the architecture for diversity and community engagement in higher education. Imagining America. https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=ia
Thomas, T. W., & Thompson, A. (2022). Engagement opportunities and challenges of transdisciplinary practice: The 1890 Land-Grant perspective. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.54656/jces.v14i3.472
Trebil-Smith, K. (2019). Perceptions of partnership: A study on nonprofit and higher education collaboration. Iowa Campus Compact.
Wallerstein, N., Muhammad, M., Sanchez-Youngman, S., Rodriguez Espinosa, P., Avila, M., Baker, E. A., Barnett, S., Belone, L., Golub, M., Lucero, J., Mahdi, I., Noyes, E., Nguyen, T., Roubideaux, Y., Sigo, R., & Duran, B. (2019). Power dynamics in community-based participatory research: A multiple–case study analysis of partnering contexts, histories, and practices. Health Education & Behavior, 46(1_suppl), 19S-32S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119852998
Ward, E., Janke, E., Wrencher, E., Goodner, H., Mitchell, T., & Hempill, M. (2024). Faculty community-engaged scholars choosing to come and stay: Alignment between individual and institutional identities and values. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.37333/001c.127561
Ward, E., Shonkoff, E., Carlson, C., & Stuetzle, C. (2023). Advancing community-engaged research via the food justice research and action cluster: A transdisciplinary ecosystem model advancing community. Metropolitan Universities, 34(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.18060/27154
Weerts, D. J. (2014). State funding and the engaged university: Understanding community engagement and state appropriations for higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 38(1), 133–169.
Welch, M. (2016). Engaging higher education: Purpose, platforms, and programs for community engagement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444473
Wendling, L. (2023). Evaluating community-engaged research in promotion and tenure. Metropolitan Universities, 34(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.18060/26658