The Full SPECTRUM: Developing a Tripartite Partnership between Community, Government and Academia for Collaborative Social Policy Research

Main Article Content

Jennifer E Enns
Marni Brownell
Hera J M Casidsid
Mikayla Hunter
Anita Durksen
Lorna A Turnbull
Nathan C Nickel
Karine Levasseur
Myra J Tait
Scott Sinclair
Selena Randall
Amy Freier
Colette Scatliff
Emily Brownell
Aine Dolin
Nora Murdock
Alyson Mahar
Stephanie Sinclair
the SPECTRUM Partnership


Problem: In Canadian society, public policies guide the development and administration of social services and systems, including the public education system, the justice system, family services, social housing and income support. However, because social services are often planned and implemented in a ‘siloed’ manner, coordination and collaboration across departments, sectors and organisations is sorely lacking. Data and resource constraints may prevent services being evaluated to ensure they meet the needs of the people for whom they are intended. When the needs of individuals are not addressed, the result is poor outcomes and wasted resources across multiple areas.
Our Response: In 2018, we formed the SPECTRUM Partnership in response to a recognised need for collaborative cross-sector approaches to strengthening the policies that shape social services and systems in our country. The tripartite SPECTRUM partnership comprises representatives from community organisations, government and academia, and is an entity designed to conduct social policy research and evaluation, incorporating interdisciplinary perspectives and expertise from its members. Guided by community-driven research questions and building on existing data resources, SPECTRUM seeks to address specific knowledge gaps in social programs, services and systems. New research findings are then translated into viable public policy options, in alignment with government priorities, and presented to policy-makers for consideration.
Implications: In this practice-based article, we describe the key steps we took to create the SPECTRUM partnership, build our collective capacity for research and evaluation, and transform our research findings into actionable evidence to support sound public policy. We outline four of SPECTRUM’s achievements to date in the hope that the lessons we learned during the development of the partnership may serve as a guide for others aiming to optimise public policy development in a collaborative evidence-based way.

Article Details

Practice-based articles (Non-refereed)


Australian Public Service Commission (2012) Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Available at: (Accessed: 1 November 2018).
Bowen, S., Martens, P. and The Need to Know Team (2005) ‘Demystifying knowledge translation: learning from the community’, J Health Serv Res Policy, 10(4), pp. 203–211. doi: 10.1258/135581905774414213.
Brownell, M. et al. (2015) The Educational Outcomes of Children in Care in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. Available at:
Brownell, M. et al. (2020) The Overlap Between the Child Welfare and Youth Criminal Justice Systems: Documenting ‘Cross-Over Kids’ in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB. Available at:
Brownell, M. D. et al. (2016) ‘Unconditional Prenatal Income Supplement and Birth Outcomes’, Pediatrics, 137(6), p. e20152992. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2992.
Canadian Child Welfare Research Portal (2018) Canadian Statistics (Provincial). Available at: (Accessed: 21 September 2020).
Cantor, A. et al. (2015) ‘Training interdisciplinary “wicked problem” solvers: applying lessons from HERO in community-based research experiences for undergraduates’,, 39(3), pp. 407–419. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2015.1048508.
Chartier, M. et al. (2020) Our Children, Our Future: The Health and Well-being of First Nations Children in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for health Policy. Available at:
Choate, P. W. et al. (2018) Assessment of parental capacity for child protection: Methodological, cultural and ethical considerations in respect of Indigenous Peoples. Kingston University. Available at: (Accessed: 14 January 2022).
Cram, F. et al. (2015) ‘Understanding overrepresentation of indigenous children in child welfare data: An application of the drake risk and bias models’, Child Maltreatment, 20(3), pp. 170–182. doi: 10.1177/1077559515580392.
Enns, J. E. et al. (2021) ‘An unconditional prenatal income supplement is associated with improved birth and early childhood outcomes among First Nations children in Manitoba, Canada: a population-based cohort study’, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2021 21:1, 21(1), pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1186/S12884-021-03782-W.
Fallon, B. et al. (2017) ‘How can data drive policy and practice in child welfare? Making the link in Canada’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(10). doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101223.
Falster, K. et al. (2021) ‘Preschool attendance and developmental outcomes at age five in Indigenous and non-Indigenous children: a population-based cohort study of 100 357 Australian children’, J Epidemiol Community Health, 75(4), pp. 371–379. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214672.
Felt, U. et al. (eds) (2017) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 4th edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fortier, J. et al. (2018) ‘Adapting and enhancing PAX Good Behavior Game for First Nations communities: a mixed-methods study protocol developed with Swampy Cree Tribal Council communities in Manitoba’, BMJ Open, 8(2), p. e018454. doi: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2017-018454.
Garcia-Iriarte, E. et al. (2009) ‘“Who Did What?”: A Participatory Action Research Project to Increase Group Capacity for Advocacy’, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22(1), pp. 10–22. doi: 10.1111/J.1468-3148.2008.00431.X.
Gilbert, R. et al. (2012) ‘Child maltreatment: variation in trends and policies in six developed countries’, Lancet, 379(1474–547X (Electronic)), pp. 758–772. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61087-8.
Hondzel, C. D. and Hansen, R. (2015) ‘Associating creativity, context, and experiential learning’,, 6(2). doi: 10.3402/EDUI.V6.23403.
Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004) States of Knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Abingdon, Routledge.
Katz, A. et al. (2019) ‘Population Data Centre Profile: The Manitoba Centre for Health Policy’, International Journal of Population Data Science, 4(2), p. 10. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1131.
Katz, A. et al. (2021) ‘Closing the loop: From system-based data to evidence-influenced policy and practice’, International Journal of Population Data Science, 6(3). doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i1.1701.
Kirkness, V. and BarnHardt, R. (2001) ‘First Nations and Higher Education: The Four R’s - Respect, Relevance, Reciprocity, Responsibility’, in Hayoe, R. and Pan, J. (eds) Knowledge Across Cultures: A Contribution to Dialogue among Civilizations. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Krakouer, J., Wu Tan, W. and Parolini, A. (2021) ‘Who is analysing what? The opportunities, risks and implications of using predictive risk modelling with Indigenous Australians in child protection: A scoping review’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(2), pp. 173–197. doi: 10.1002/AJS4.155.
Krieger, N. (2011) Epidemiology and the People’s Health: Theory and Context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Krieger, N. (2013) ‘Researching critical questions on social justice and public health: an ecosocial perspective.’, in Levy, B. and Sidel, V. (eds) Social Injustice and Health. 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Krieger, N. (2015) ‘Public health, embodied history, and social justice: looking forward’, Int J Health Services, 45, pp. 587–600. doi: 10.1177/0020731415595549.
Lewis, S. (2011) ‘How Has Health Services Research Made a Difference?’, Healthcare Policy, 6(Special Issue), pp. 74–79. doi: 10.12927/HCPOL.2011.22121.
Martens, P. J. and Roos, N. P. (2005) ‘When Health Services Researchers and Policy Makers Interact: Tales from the Tectonic Plates’, Healthcare Policy, 1(1), p. 72. Available at: https://pmc/articles/PMC2585237/ (Accessed: 21 September 2021).
Martin, D. H. (2012) ‘Two-eyed seeing: a framework for understanding indigenous and non-indigenous approaches to indigenous health research.’, The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 44(2), pp. 20–42.
Nickel, N. C. et al. (2021) ‘Differential effects of a school‐based obesity prevention program: A cluster randomized trial’, Maternal & Child Nutrition, 17(1), p. e13009. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13009.
O’Donnell, M., Scott, D. and Stanley, F. (2008) ‘Child abuse and neglect--is it time for a public health approach?’, Aust N Z J Public Health, 32(1326–0200 (Print)), pp. 325–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00249.x.
Oreskes, N. (2019) Why Trust Science? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2010) Developmental evaluation: applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press.
Roos, N. et al. (2010) ‘Enhancing policymakers’ understanding of disparities: relevant data from an information-rich environment’, Milbank Q., 88(3), pp. 382–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00604.x.
Sinha, V. et al. (2021) ‘A Review of Literature on the Involvement of Children from Indigenous Communities in Anglo Child Welfare Systems: 1973-2018’, International Indigenous Policy Journal, 12(1), pp. 1–43. doi: 10.18584/IIPJ.2021.12.1.10818.
Smith, M. et al. (2015) ‘Health Services Data: Managing the Data Warehouse: 25 years of Experience at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy’, in Sobolev, B., Levy, A., and Goring, S. (eds) Data and Measures in Health Services Research. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 1–26.
Spence, K. K. and McDonald, M. A. (2015) ‘Assessing Vertical Development in Experiential Learning Curriculum’: 38(3), pp. 296–312. doi: 10.1177/1053825915571749.
Stukel, T. A. et al. (2007) ‘Analysis of Observational Studies in the Presence of Treatment Selection Bias Effects of Invasive Cardiac Management on AMI Survival Using Propensity Score and Instrumental Variable Methods’, JAMA, 297(3). doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.278
Tchetgen, E. J. T., Michael, H. and Cui, Y. (2018) ‘Marginal Structural Models for Time-varying Endogenous Treatments: A Time-Varying Instrumental Variable Approach’. Available at: (Accessed: 23 January 2022).
The First Nations Information Governance Centre (2014) Ownership, Control, Access and Possession (OCAP): The Path to First Nations Information Governance. Ottawa: The First Nations Information Governance Centre. Available at:
Uddin, M. et al. (2015) ‘Instrumental Variable Analysis in Epidemiologic Studies: An Overview of the Estimation Methods’, Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta, 6(4), p. 1000353. doi: 10.4172/2153-2435.1000353.
Urquia, M. et al. (2020) The Diversity of Immigrants to Manitoba, Migration Dynamics and Basic Healthcare Service Use. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. Available at:
Walter, M. and Andersen, C. (2013) Indigenous Statistics: A Quantitative Research Methodology. Taylor & Francis Group. Available at:
Wang, F. and Hannafin, M. J. (2005) ‘Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments’, Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), pp. 5–23. doi: 10.1007/BF02504682.
Ziman, J. (2000) Real Science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.