'Do you own your freedom?' Reflecting on Cape Town youths' aspirations to be free
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Young people make up half of the world’s population and constitute the majority of the population across the Global South (Cooper et al. 2019). In South Africa, the youth constitute one-third of the country’s population, many of whom belong to the so-called ‘born free’ generation. The ‘born free’ generation typically refers to those who were born after the end of Apartheid, or those who were coming of age after 1994. The youth, particularly in cities of the South, represent an excluded majority in terms of access to meaningful employment and quality living environments.
This article reflects on a research project which used narrative photovoice as a method to engage a group of 13 young people from Mitchell’s Plain, Philippi and Gugulethu; poor marginalised areas in Cape Town. Narrative photovoice combines photography with writing to give participants an opportunity to convey particular stories or issues through their photography. Through a process of co-production and collaboration between academic researchers, a community-based organisation (CBO) called ‘Youth for Change’ and a creative enterprise called ‘noDREAD’productions, the youth were engaged in a creative process using photographs to tell stories about themselves, their communities and the broader city context in which they live.
This article draws on Appadurai’s notion of the ‘capacity to aspire’ to make sense of the aspirations and dreams the participants talk about through their photographs; how they navigate structural, psychological and other factors which impede their aspirations and their freedom, and how they make sense of their everyday realities. The article advances two interlinked arguments: firstly, it makes visible the ‘navigational capacity’ of youth from marginalised neighbourhoods and their capacity to aspire amidst multiple constraints. It does so by illustrating how the youth grapple with the idea and experience of freedom in their everyday life. Secondly, it makes a case for the use of photovoice as a method that is well positioned to (a) capture the visual dimension of youth aspirations and (b) allow for co-production between the different stakeholders.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit articles to this journal from 31st March 2014 for publication, agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
For Volume 6 (2013) and before, the following copyright applied:
Articles published by UTSePress are protected by copyright which is retained by the authors who assert their moral rights. Authors control translation and reproduction rights to their works published by UTSePress. UTSePress publications are copyright and all rights are reserved worldwide. Downloads of specific portions of them are permitted for personal use only, not for commercial use or resale. Permissions to reprint or use any materials should be directed to UTSePress.
References
Bandura A, 1998, ‘Personal and collective efficacy in human adaptation and change’ in Advance in psychological science, Vol 1- Personal, social and cultural aspects, Adair J.G and Belanger D (eds), Psychology Press, United Kingdom, p. 51-71.
Banks N, 2015, ‘Understanding youth: towards a psychology of youth poverty and development in Sub-Saharan African cities, Working Paper216, Brooks World Poverty Institute (BWPI), The University of Manchester, United Kingdom, p. 1-22.
Camfield L, Masae A, McGregor A and Promphaking B, 2012, Cultures of Aspiration and Poverty? Aspirational Inequalities in Northeast and Southern Thailand, 2012, Working Paper 38, The School of International Development, University of East Anglia, p.1-35.
Cooper A, Swartz S and Mahali A, 2019, ‘Disentangled, decentered and democratized: Youth studies for the Global South’, Journal of Youth Studies, Vol. 22, p. 29-45, DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2018.1471199.
Copestake J and Camfield L, 2010, ‘Measuring multi-dimensional aspirational gaps: a means of understanding cultural aspects of poverty’, Development Policy Review, Vol. 28(5), p. 617-633, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00501.x.
Di Nunzio M, 2012, ‘We are good at surviving: Street hustling in Addis Ababa’s inner city’, Urban Forum, Vol. 23, p. 433-447, DOI 10.1007/s12132-012-9156-y.
Honwana A, 2014, Waithood: Youth Transitions and Social Change—Response to Syed Mansoob Murshed. In Development and Equity: An Interdisciplinary Exploration by Ten Scholars from Africa, Asia and Latin America, D. Foeken, T. Dietz, L. Haan, and L. Johnson (eds), Boston: Brill,p. 19-27, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004269729_004.
Ibrahim S, 2011, Poverty, aspirations and wellbeing: afraid to aspire and unable to reach a better life – voices from Egypt, BWPI Working Paper 141, Creating and sharing knowledge to help end poverty, Brookes World Poverty Institute, ISB 978-1-907247-40-8, p1-23.
Jeffrey C and McDowell L, 2004, ‘Youth in a comparative perspective: Global change, local lives’, Youth and Society, Vol. 36 (2), p.131-142, DOI: 10.1177/0044118X04268375.
Klein E, 2014, Psychological agency: Evidence from the urban fringe of Bamako, Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI), Working Paper 69, University of Oxford, ISBB 978-19-0719-456-6, p. 1-29.
Locke C and Lintello D, 2012, “Young Zambians ‘waiting’ for opportunities and working towards living well: Life course and aspiration in youth transitions”, Journal of International Development, Vol. 24, p. 777-794, DOI: 10.1002/jid.2867.
Narayan-Parker D, 2005, ed. Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. World Bank Publications, Washington.
Ray D, 2003, Aspirations, poverty and economic change, New York University and Instituto de Análisis Económico (CSIC).
Statistics South Africa, 2020, Quarterly Labourforce Survey 2020, Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.
Thieme T A, 2018, ‘The hustle economy: Informality, uncertainty and the geographies of getting by', Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 212 (4), p.529-548.
UN Habitat, 2012, ‘State of the Urban Youth – Youth in the Prosperity of Cities – Overview and Summary of Findings’, UN Habitat, Nairobi.
UN Habitat, 2013, ‘Cities of Youth: Cities of Prosperity’, United Nationals Human Settlement Programme, UN Habitat, Nairobi.