Towards a Sustainability Elective Classification: Evidence, Equity and Institutional Change in Higher Education

Main Article Content

Cathy Avila-Linn

Abstract

The Carnegie Elective Classification for Sustainability was developed to support higher education institutions in advancing sustainability through institutional self-study, systems thinking, organisational learning and institutional transformation. By encouraging evidence-­ based reflection and cross-­ campus engagement, the classification has the potential to shape institutional priorities, strengthen practices and accelerate sustainability efforts across higher education. Drawing on a multi-­ year feasibility study, a field-­ informed development process, and a pilot involving 20 colleges and universities across the United States and Puerto Rico, this article examines the origins, implementation and early outcomes of the classification. The pilot engaged institutions in a Community of Practice, application development, and peer review process that fostered shared learning and built a collaborative network of institutions advancing sustainability.


Findings suggest that classification is more than a recognition mechanism. Participating institutions reported that the process increased awareness of existing sustainability efforts; strengthened cross-­ campus collaboration; expanded institutional networks; and encouraged more strategic alignment between sustainability initiatives and institutional mission. The self-­ study process helped institutions identify strengths, uncover gaps and better understand the relationships among teaching, research, operations, community engagement and student learning. Participants also highlighted the value of a flexible framework that recognises diverse institutional contexts, missions and approaches to sustainability while maintaining a shared commitment to environmental stewardship, social equity, economic resilience and community wellbeing.


The article argues that the Carnegie Elective Classification for Sustainability has the potential to serve as both a catalyst and a framework for institutional transformation. By encouraging evidence-based reflection, organisational learning and collaborative problem-­ solving, the classification may help institutions deepen and accelerate sustainability efforts across higher education. Implications for future research, institutional practice and the development of sustainability assessment frameworks are discussed.

Article Details

Section

Research articles (Refereed)

Author Biography

Cathy Avila-Linn, CMEA Collaborative LLC

Cathy Avila-Linn, M.Ed. is Principal Consultant at CMEA Collaborative LLC, where she supports higher education institutions in community engagement, leadership development, and institutional change. She facilitated the Community of Practice for the Carnegie Elective Classification for Sustainability Pilot, supported the launch of the 2027 classification cycle, and has served as a consultant and Tier 1 and Tier 2 reviewer for the Carnegie Community Engagement Classification, bringing a collaborative, equity-centered approach grounded in intentionality, transparency, inclusivity, and shared learning.

References

AASHE 2023, Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS), Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education.

Agyeman, J, Schlosberg, D, Craven, L & Matthews, C 2016, ‘Trends and directions in environmental justice: From inequity to everyday life, community, and just sustainabilities’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 41, pp. 321–­ 340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-­environ-­110615-­090052

Almusharraf, N 2026, ‘A systematic review of institutional barriers to sustainable development in higher education institutions’, Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-­026-­01927-­7

Christou, O, Manou, DB, Armenia, S, Franco, E, Blouchoutzi, A & Papathanasiou, J 2024, ‘Fostering a whole-institution approach to sustainability through systems thinking: An analysis of the state-­ of-­ the-­ art in sustainability integration in higher education institutions’, Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 6, 2508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062508

Disterheft, A, Caeiro, S, Azeiteiro, UM & Leal Filho, W 2015, ‘Sustainable universities –­ A study of critical success factors for participatory approaches’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 106, pp. 11–­ 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.030

Findler, F, Schönherr, N, Lozano, R & Stacherl, B 2019, ‘Assessing the impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development –­ An analysis of tools and indicators’, Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 1, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010059

García, I & Martínez-­ Román, L 2025, ‘Participatory land planning, community land trusts, and managed retreat: Transforming informality and building resilience to flood risk in Puerto Rico’s Caño Martín Peña’, Land, vol. 14, no. 3, 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14030485

Holst, J 2023, ‘Towards coherence on sustainability in education: A systematic review of whole institution approaches’, Sustainability Science, vol. 18, pp. 1015–­ 1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-­022-­01226-­8

Holst, J, Grund, J & Brock, A 2024, ‘Whole institution approach: Measurable and highly effective in empowering learners and educators for sustainability’, Sustainability Science, vol. 19, pp. 1359–­ 1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-­01506-­5

International Labour Organization 2015, Guidelines for a just transition towards environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all, International Labour Office, Geneva.

Leal Filho, W, Morgan, EA, Godoy, ES, Azeiteiro, US, Bacelar-­ Nicolau, P, Veiga Avila, L, Mac-­ Lean, C & Hugé, JJA 2018, ‘Implementing climate change research at universities: Barriers, potential and actions’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 170, pp. 269–­ 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.105

Leal Filho, W, Amaro, N, Avila, LV, Brandli, L, Damke, LI, Vasconcelos, CRP, Hernandez-­ Diaz, PM, Frankenberger, F, Fritzen, B, Velazquez, L & Salvia, A 2021, ‘Mapping sustainability initiatives in higher education institutions in Latin America’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 315, 128093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128093

Lozano, R, Ceulemans, K, Alonso-­ Almeida, M, Huisingh, D, Lozano, FJ, Waas, T, Lambrechts, W, Lukman, R & Hugé, J 2015, ‘A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: Results from a worldwide survey’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 108, pp. 1–­ 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048

Ogbolu, G, Hague, S, Adelaja, A, Ohanagorom, M, Amala, M & Adedeji, O 2026, ‘Sustainability in higher education: A systematic review and conceptual framework of institutional maturity (SHE-­ IMM)’, Trends in Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu5010026

United Nations 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations, New York.