Excused Absence: U.S. Community Colleges and the Carnegie Elective Classification for Community Engagement from 2006-2024
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the United States, community colleges enrol roughly 40 per cent of all undergraduates and operate under an open- access, locally bounded mission widely described as ‘democracy’s colleges’. They are, by mission and demographic reality, among the most community- embedded institutions in U.S. higher education. Yet, they are nearly absent from the Carnegie Elective Classification for Community Engagement (CECCE), the higher education recognition system designed to honour such work: only 5.4 per cent of currently classified institutions are community colleges. This article examines this absence as a structural condition rather than an institutional failure. A qualitative descriptive thematic analysis of the 26 community colleges achieving CECCE recognition across the 2006, 2008, 2010, 2015, 2020 and 2024 application cycles maps successful applications onto the framework’s five evidentiary categories: institutional definition of community engagement, infrastructure, campus- wide assessment, student roles, and curricular engagement.
The analysis identifies points of convergence, particularly in student roles and service- learning, alongside persistent gaps in infrastructure expectations, longitudinal assessment requirements, and a definitional ordering placing scholarship and research above teaching and citizenship. The pattern across cycles shows the pace of new community college classifications falling by roughly 80 per cent between the 2008 and 2024 cycles. The 2026 redesign of the CECCE framework broadens the language of recognition through partnership reciprocity, asset- based engagement, and epistemic inclusion, and introduces fee- based technical assistance for applicants. Each is a meaningful step. None addresses the underlying resource asymmetry making documentation of engagement structurally more costly at a community college than at a well-resourced 4- year institution. The article argues this asymmetry constitutes an excused absence: not an institutional choice to step away from recognition, but the predictable outcome of an evidentiary architecture continuing to assume the resources, mission, and scholarly orientation of the 4-year research university. Broadening the framing is necessary but not sufficient.
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit articles to this journal from 31st March 2014 for publication, agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
For Volume 6 (2013) and before, the following copyright applied:
Articles published by UTSePress are protected by copyright which is retained by the authors who assert their moral rights. Authors control translation and reproduction rights to their works published by UTSePress. UTSePress publications are copyright and all rights are reserved worldwide. Downloads of specific portions of them are permitted for personal use only, not for commercial use or resale. Permissions to reprint or use any materials should be directed to UTSePress.
References
American Association of Community Colleges 2024, Fast facts 2024, viewed 1 June 2026, https://www.aacc.nche.edu/research-trends/fast-facts/
American Association of University Professors 2025, ‘Data snapshot: Tenure and contingency in US higher education, fall 2023’, Academe Magazine, Spring 2025, viewed 1 June 2026, https://www.aaup.org/academe/issues/spring-2025/data-snapshot-tenure-and-contingency-us-higher-education-fall-2023
American Council on Education n.d., Carnegie Elective Classification for Community Engagement, viewed 1 June 2026, https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/elective-classifications/community-engagement/
American Council on Education 2025, Carnegie Elective Classification series: People-centered systems change in higher education, viewed 1 June 2026, https://www.acenet.edu/Events/Pages/Carnegie-Elective-Classification-Series.aspx
Boggs, GR 2011a, ‘Community colleges in the spotlight and under the microscope’, New Directions for Community Colleges, vol. 2011, no. 156, pp. 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.462
Boggs, GR 2011b, Democracy’s colleges: The evolution of the community college, The White House Conference on Community Colleges, viewed 1 June 2026, https://www.aacc.nche.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/WhiteHouseDemocracysColleges.pdf
Braun, V & Clarke, V 2006, ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V & Clarke, V 2022, Thematic analysis: A practical guide, Sage, London.
Brown University 2020, Brown earns national recognition for community engagement from Carnegie Foundation, 31 January, viewed 1 June 2026, https://www.brown.edu/news/2020-01-31/carnegie
Carnegie Classifications 2024, Reimagining the Elective Classifications: 2026 Community Engagement framework, viewed 1 June 2026, https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/reimagining-the-elective-classifications/
Carnegie Classifications 2026, What is community engagement?, viewed 1 June 2026, https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/elective-classifications/community-engagement/
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching 2026, Carnegie Foundation selects colleges and universities for 2026 Community Engagement Classification, hosting of CE moves from ACE to University of San Diego, 12 January, viewed 1 June 2026, https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/news/carnegie-2026-community-engagement-classifications
Community College Baccalaureate Association n.d., National program inventory: Baccalaureate degrees by state, viewed 23 March 2025, https://www.accbd.org/state-inventory/
Cutler White, C 2019, ‘Higher education governance and the attainment agenda: Arrangements with benefits for community colleges?’, Community College Review, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552119852158
Cutler White, C 2022, ‘Community college governance and trustees as advocates for fiscal support’, in R Gillett-Karam & PL Eddy (eds), Reflections on boards of trustees, New Directions for Community Colleges, 200, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20549
Cutler White, C & King, S 2024, ‘Examining civic engagement and volunteering outcomes of democracy’s colleges’, Journal of Education and Social Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, viewed 1 June 2026, https://www.jespnet.com/journals/Vol_11_No_1_June_2024/7.pdf
Dortch, C 2024, Federal Pell grant program of the Higher Education Act: Primer (CRS Report No. R45418), Congressional Research Service, viewed 1 June 2026, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45418
Driscoll, A 2008, ‘Carnegie’s community-engagement classification: Intentions and insights’, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 38–41. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.1.38-41
Fear, FA & Sandmann, LR 2016, ‘It’s time for a second wave movement’, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 113–126. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1261
Fear, FA & Sandmann, LR 2019, ‘It’s time for a second-wave movement’, in LR Sandmann & DO Jones (eds), Building the field of higher education engagement: Foundational ideas and future directions, Routledge, New York, pp. 99–110. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003443353
Foley, D, Milan, L & Hamrick, K 2021, The increasing role of community colleges among bachelor’s degree recipients: Findings from the 2019 National Survey of College Graduates (NSF 21-309), National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, viewed 1 June 2026, https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21309
GED Testing Service n.d., Annual statistical report, viewed 1 June 2026, https://ged.com/
Hearn, JC & Griswold, CP 1994, ‘State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 161–190. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737016002161
Jones, C 2024, Call for 2026 cycle Tier One reviewers: Carnegie Elective Classification for Community Engagement, American Council on Education, viewed 1 June 2026, https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/elective-classifications/community-engagement/
Kisker, CB, Cohen, AM & Brawer, FB 2023, The American community college, 7th edn, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Kisker, C, Cutler White, C, King, S, Johnson, J & Bowlin, W 2025, A landscape analysis of civic and community engagement in community colleges: Results from the 2024 AmeriCorps Civic Engagement Among Community Colleges Project (ACECCP), Institutional Repository, viewed 1 June 2026, https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/coe-publications/103/
Lizzul, I, Bradley, M, Di Giorgio, L, Äikäs, RM, Murolo, S & Zinger, L 2015, ‘The impact of service-learning on academic knowledge, personal growth, and civic engagement in community college students’, Journal of Civic Commitment, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–19, viewed 1 June 2026, https://www.mesacc.edu/community-civic-engagement/journals/issue-22
Long, A & Mullin, CM (eds) 2014, America’s forgotten student population: Creating a path to college success for GED completers, Stylus, Sterling, VA.
McGuinness, AC 2022, Patterns of state coordination and governance of community and technical colleges and other less-than-baccalaureate institutions, National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, viewed 1 June 2026, https://nshe.nevada.edu/wp-content/uploads/file/cc-wf-training-committee/2022/jun-6/Ref.%20AB450-3.%20Patterns%20of%20State%20Coordination.%20Report.pdf
Mullin, CM & Honeyman, DS 2007, ‘The funding of community colleges: A typology of state funding formulas’, Community College Review, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552107306409
Newell, MA 2014, ‘America’s democracy colleges: The civic engagement of community college students’, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 794–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2012.720862
Pearl, A, Jones-Friedrichs, C, Ward, E, Cunningham, HR, Azordegan, JM, Cruz, T, Deas, F, Locke, E, Mitchell, TD, Padalkar, TV, Quito, D & White, CC 2025, ‘The Carnegie Elective Classifications: A methodological guide for community engagement research’, International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, vol. 13, no. 1, viewed 1 June 2026, https://ijrslce.scholasticahq.com/article/151686
Robinson, G 2007, Community colleges broadening horizons through service-learning, 2006–2009, American Association of Community Colleges, viewed 1 June 2026, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499827.pdf
Saldaña, J 2013, The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 2nd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Saltmarsh, J & Hartley, M (eds) 2011, ‘To serve a larger purpose’: Engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Shapiro, D, Dundar, A, Huie, F, Wakhungu, PK, Yuan, X, Nathan, A & Hwang, Y 2018, A national view of student movement in postsecondary institutions, fall 2011 cohort (Signature Report No. 15), National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, viewed 1 June 2026, https://nscresearchcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/Signature-Report-15.pdf
State Higher Education Executive Officers Association, Kunkle, K, Burns, R, Duren, J, Heckert, K & Weeden, D 2024, State higher education finance: FY 2023, viewed 1 June 2026, https://shef.sheeo.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/SHEEO_SHEF_FY23_Report.pdf
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education 2024, Adult education and family literacy act program statistics, viewed 1 June 2026, https://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/index.html
Van Noy, M, Jacobs, J, Korey, S, Bailey, T & Hughes, KL 2008, Noncredit enrollment in workforce education: State policies and community college practices, American Association of Community Colleges and Community College Research Center, viewed 1 June 2026, https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/noncredit-enrollment-workforce-education.html
Weerts, DJ, Cabrera, AF & Sanford, T 2010, ‘Beyond giving: Political advocacy and volunteer behaviors of public university alumni’, Research in Higher Education, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9158-3
Xu, D & Ran, FX 2020, ‘Noncredit education in community college: Students, course enrollments, and academic outcomes’, Community College Review, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552119876039
Zook, GF 1947a, Higher education for American democracy: A report of the President’s Commission on Higher Education. Volume 1: Establishing the goals, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, viewed 1 June 2026, https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112022463886&view=1up&seq=7
Zook, GF 1947b, Higher education for American democracy: A report of the President’s Commission on Higher Education. Volume 2: Equalizing and expanding individual opportunity, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Zook, GF 1948, Higher education for American democracy: A report of the President’s Commission on Higher Education. Volume 3: Organizing higher education, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.