Creative Civics in Higher Education: Evaluating Implementation of Artistic Activism Pedagogy through the Unstoppable Voters Faculty Fellowship
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study evaluates the pedagogical impact of the Center for Artistic Activism’s (C4AA) Creative Campaign Framework, as implemented through the 2024 Unstoppable Voters Faculty Fellowship. The fellowship was a United States-based initiative designed to foster creative, non-partisan civic engagement in higher education using C4AA trainings and materials as outlined in their Creative Campaign Framework. The fellowship supported a cohort of nine faculty members across seven institutions, ranging from research universities to liberal arts colleges and a historically black university, that integrated C4AA materials into courses spanning clinical psychology, political science, theatre, design and the visual arts. Using a Faculty Learning Community (FLC) model and grounded in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), the study employed qualitative methods to examine how fellows adapted the Creative Campaign Framework, the strategies they used to engage students and the outcomes of their campus-based civic engagement projects. Key findings include the Framework’s adaptability across disciplines, student responses to this approach to creative civic learning and the opportunities and challenges of translating activist language to academic settings. This is the first study to assess the application of the C4AA’s artistic activism pedagogy in a coordinated higher education initiative, offering new insights into the potential of creative civics pedagogy using the C4AA Creative Campaign Framework as an impactful and adaptable approach to teaching democratic habits and civic engagement.
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit articles to this journal from 31st March 2014 for publication, agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
For Volume 6 (2013) and before, the following copyright applied:
Articles published by UTSePress are protected by copyright which is retained by the authors who assert their moral rights. Authors control translation and reproduction rights to their works published by UTSePress. UTSePress publications are copyright and all rights are reserved worldwide. Downloads of specific portions of them are permitted for personal use only, not for commercial use or resale. Permissions to reprint or use any materials should be directed to UTSePress.
References
Anderson, T, Gussak, D, Hallmark, KK & Paul, AS (eds) 2010, Art education for social justice, National Art Education Association, Reston, Virginia.
Ask Every Student 2022, Your major on the ballot, viewed 23 April 2025, https://www.studentvoting.org/your-major-on- the-ballot.
Bauer, B 2025, ‘Art in a democratic society’, in T Azar, Community engagement and the COVID-19 pandemic: Affordances and challenges of service learning in crisis, Vernon Press, Wilmington.
Beyerbach, B & Davis, RD (eds) 2011, Activist art in social justice pedagogy: Engaging students in global issues through the arts, Peter Lang, New York.
Black, R, Cady-Alviar, A, Moye, D & Zubizarreta, D 2023, ‘Critical conversations in art history: The state of the field from students’ perspectives’, in C Stewart, E Burke, L Hochtritt & T Northington (eds), Cultivating critical conversations in art education, Teachers College Press.
Buller, RE 2021, ‘Activism, art, and design: Bringing social justice to life in the higher education curriculum’, Art Education, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 31–39.
Center for Artistic Activism (C4AA) 2023a, Ways to win with unstoppable voters in 2024, viewed 23 April 2025, https:// c4aa.org/2023/10/ways-to-win-with-unstoppable-voters-in-2024?mc_cid=f64a0efb5f&mc_eid=UNIQID&mc_ cid=f64a0efb5f&mc_eid=UNIQID.
Center for Artistic Activism (C4AA) 2023b, Unleashing unstoppable voters: A creative campaign toolkit from The Center for Artistic Activism, viewed 23 April 2025, https://c4aa.org/kit.
Center for Artistic Activism (C4AA) 2024, 15 key takeaways from our 2024 faculty fellowship, viewed 23 April 2025, https://c4aa.org/2024/06/15-key-takeaways-from-our-2024-faculty-fellowship.
Claassen, C & Magalhães, P 2023, ‘Public support for democracy in the United States has declined generationally’, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 719–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad039
Colby, A, Ehrlich, T, Beaumont, E & Stephens, J 2003, Educating citizens: Preparing America’s undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility, Jossey-Bass, New Jersey.
Costanza-Chock, S 2020, Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need, MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001
Cox, M 2004, ‘Introduction to faculty learning communities’, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 2004, no. 97, pp. 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.129
Crick, N 2019, Dewey for a new age of fascism: Teaching democratic habits, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271085685
Dewhurst, M 2014, Social justice art: A framework for activist art pedagogy, Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Dinas, E, Valentim, V, Broberg, N & Franklin, M 2024, ‘Early voting experiences and habit formation’, Political Science Research and Methods, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2023.2
Doran, G 1981, ‘There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives’, Management Review, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 35–36.
Duncombe, S & Lambert, S 2021, The art of activism: Your all-purpose guide to making the impossible possible, OR Books, New York. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29895216
Felten, P 2013, ‘Principles of good practice in SoTL’, Teaching & Learning Inquiry, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 121–25. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121
Helguera, P 2011, Education for socially engaged art: A materials and techniques handbook, Jorge Pinto Books, New York. International IDEA 2024, Perceptions of democracy: A survey about how people assess democracy around the world, viewed 24 April 2025, https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2024.24
Keifer-Boyd, K, Knight, WB, Pérez de Miles, A, Ehrlich, CE, Lin, Y-J & Holt, A 2023, Teaching and assessing social justice art education: Power, politics, and possibilities, Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003183716
Langfitt, F 2025, ‘Hundreds of scholars say U.S. is swiftly heading toward authoritarianism’, NPR, 22 April, viewed 24 April 2025, https://www.npr.org/2025/04/22/nx-s1-5340753/trump-democracy-authoritarianism-competive- survey-political-scientist.
Levine, P 2013, We are the ones we have been waiting for: The promise of civic renewal in America, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
Mouffe, C 2007, ‘Artistic activism and agonistic spaces’, Art & Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–5.
Naidus, B 2009, Arts for change: Teaching outside the frame, New Village Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21pxm7p
Saltmarsh, J & Hartley, M (eds) 2011, ‘To serve a larger purpose’: Engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sholette, G & Bass, C 2018, Art as social action: An introduction to the principles and practices of teaching social practice art, Allworth Press.
Simpson, D & Stack, S (eds) 2010, Teachers, leaders and schools: Essays by John Dewey, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois.
Tavin, K & Ballengee Morris, C (eds) 2013, Stand(ing) up, for change: Voices of arts educators, National Art Education Association, Reston, VA.