Doing What we Know we Should: Engaged scholarship and community development

Bruce Muirhead, Geoff Woolcock


Abstract

In Australia, engaged scholarship oriented towards community development objectives has yet to be recognised in funding regimes as being inherently beneficial in terms of scholarly excellence and university rankings. While the civic role of universities is acknowledged by individual universities, higher education management and at the Federal policy level, they are most often framed as funding problems related to ‘community service’ rather than as research opportunities which can raise the university’s profile by providing the basis for excellent research outputs and community enrichment. Community engagement has become a familiar term in the Australian higher education lexicon in recent years but there is still little institutional infrastructure that directly embodies the principles and sentiment of community engagement evident in current Australian universities. In this paper, the inaugural Director and Research Manager of the University of Queensland’s Community Service and Research Centre reflect on their five years leading a Centre that was/has been privileged to enjoy significant institutional support and the lessons learnt in forging into unknown territories. The reflections focus on the Centre’s seminal project, the Goodna Service Integration Project.

Full Text

PDF

References

Agranoff, R 1991, 'Human services integration: Past and present challengesin public administration', Public Administration Review, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 533–545.

Agranoff, R & McGuire, M 2001, 'After the network is formed: Processes, power, and performance' in MP Mandell (ed.), Getting results throughcollaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management, Quorum Books, Westport, CT, pp. 11–29.

Atkinson, R 1999, 'Discourses of partnership and empowerment incontemporary British urban regeneration', Urban Studies, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 59–73.

Austin, M 1997, 'Service integration: Introduction', Administration in Social Work, vol. 21, nos. 3/4, pp. 1–7.

Badcock, B 1998, 'Forgotten places, excluded citizens and the rise of onenation', Urban Policy and Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 241–246.

Benson, L, Harkavy, I & Puckett, J 2000, 'An implementation revolution as astrategy for fulfilling the democratic promise of university-communitypartnerships: Penn-West Philadelphia as an experiment in progress', Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol. 29 no. 1, pp. 24–45.

Boorman, C & Woolcock, G 2002, 'The Goodna service integration project:Government and community working together for community wellbeing inGoodna' in T Reddel (ed.), Governing local communities: Building state and community capacity, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.

Botsman, P & Latham, M (eds) 2001, The enabling state: People before bureaucracy, Pluto Press, Annandale NSW.

Boxelaar, L, Paine, M & Beilin, R 2006, 'Community engagement and publicadministration: Of silos, overlays and technologies of government', Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 113–126.

Cars, G 2000, Social exclusion in European neighbourhoods – Processes, experiences and responses, Final report of project financed under the TSERprogramme, European Commission, Brussels.

Cigler, B 2001, 'Multiorganizational, multisector, and multicommunityorganizations: Setting the research agenda' in MP Mandell (ed.), Gettingresults through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policyand management, Quorum Books, Westport, CT, pp. 71–85.

Croft, D 1998, 'Place management: A key to better urban development', Australian Planner, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 49–53.

Edgar, D 2001, The patchwork nation: Re-thinking government – Re-building community, Harper Collins, Pymble, NSW.

Keast, R, Mandell, M, Brown, K & Woolcock, G 2004, 'Network structures:Working differently and changing expectations', Public Administration Review, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 363–371.

Konrad, E 1996, 'A multidimensional framework for conceptualizing humanservices integration initiatives' in J Marquart & E Konrad (eds), Evaluating initiatives to integrate human services, American Evaluation Association no. 69, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 5–19.

Latham, M 1998, Civilising global capital: New thinking for Australian Labor, Allen and Unwin, St Leonards, NSW.

Lawson, H 2002, 'Improving conceptual clarity, accuracy, and precision andfacilitating more coherent institutional designs' in M Brabeck & M Walsh(eds), The contribution of interprofessional collaboration and comprehensiveservices to teaching and learning, The National Society for the Study ofEducation Yearbook 2002, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lowndes, V & Skelcher, C 1998 'The dynamics of multi-organizationalpartnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance', Public Administration, vol. 76, pp. 313–333.

Lowndes, V & Wilson, D 2001, 'Social capital and local governance:Exploring the institutional design variable', Political Studies, vol. 29, pp. 629–647.

Lutfiyya, M 1993, Integrated services: A summary for rural educators, ERIC Digest Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.

Mandell, MP 1999, 'Community collaborations: Working through networkstructures', Policy Studies Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 42–64.

Mandell, MP (ed.) 2001, Getting results through collaboration: Networks andnetwork structures for public policy and management, Quorum Books, Westport, CT.

Mant, J 1998, 'Place management: Why it works and how to do it', UTS Papers in Planning, no. 13, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney.

OECD 1996, Reconciling economy and society: Towards a plural economy, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.

O'Looney, J 1997, 'Marking progress toward service integration: Learning touse evaluation to overcome barriers', Administration in Social Work, vol. 21, nos. 3/4, pp. 31–65.

Onyx, J & Bullen, P 2000, 'Measuring social capital in five communities', Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 23–42.

Reddel, T 2002, 'Beyond participation, hierarchies, management andmarkets: New governance" and place policies', Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 50–63."

Reddel, T, Jones, A & Smyth, P (eds) 2001, Local governance and socialinclusion: Places and policies, School of Social Work and Social Policy, Occasional Paper No. 3, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.

Salvaris, M 2000, Community and social indicators: How citizens can measureprogress – An overview of social and community indicator projects in Australia andinternationally, Swinburne Institute for Social Research, Melbourne.

Semmens, B, Stokes, H & Downey L 1998, Establishing an integrated servicemodel in the Port Phillip cluster – An evaluation, Youth Research Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.

Social Exclusion Unit 1998, Bringing Britain together: A national strategy for neighbourhood renewal, UK Cabinet Office, http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk

Stone, W & Hughes, J 2002, Social capital: Empirical meaning and measurement validity, Research Paper No. 27, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne.

Walsh, P 2001, 'Improving governments' response to local communities – Isplace management an answer?', Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 3–12.

Watson, D 2007, Managing civic and community engagement, Open University Press, London.

Winter, I (ed.) 2000, Social capital and public policy in Australia, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne.

Yessian, M 1995, 'Learning from experience: Integrating human services', Public Welfare, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 34–39.

Zappala, G & Green, V 2001, Addressing disadvantage through placemanagement: Is there a role for nonprofit organisations?, Working Paper No. 3, The Smith Family, Sydney.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM