The Power of a Global Citizenship Curriculum on College Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
In an era marked by intensified globalization, it is increasingly important for learners to understand global issues and develop as responsible, active global citizens. Educational institutions have begun responding to this need by introducing new pedagogical approaches to global citizenship education. One community college in the north-east United States has created a global citizenship curriculum as a vehicle for educational change in the twenty- first century. The curriculum engages with both neoliberal and critical frameworks: the former emphasizes global competencies that support international mobility and employability, while the latter prioritizes reflexive learning, critical thinking, and social responsibility. Focusing on transnational knowledge exchange and global economic participation, the curriculum also seeks to instill commitments to social equality, justice, and freedom through exposure to diverse cultures and communities. Built around four themes—empathy, active listening, intercultural communication, and globalization—and delivered through faculty instruction, direct experience, and structured reflection, it has strengthened students’ knowledge, skills, and values. Survey narratives from a pilot study illustrate its impact and how it has shaped students’ personal, academic, and professional identities as global citizens.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For submissions from 31st March 2014 onwards, authors who submit articles to this journal for publication agree to the following terms:
a) Retaining Copyright and Granting Rights:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share and adapt the work. Acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal is required.
b) Non-Exclusive Distribution:
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting to an institutional repository or publishing in a book). Acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is required.
c) Online Posting and Citation Advantage:
Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process. This may lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). If authors include the work in an institutional repository or on their website, they must acknowledge the UTS ePRESS publication with relevant details.
d) Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License Awareness:
Authors should note that the CC-BY License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute) and adapt (remix, transform, build upon) the work for any purpose, including commercial use. Proper credit, a link to the license, and indication of any changes made must be provided. The manner of doing so must not suggest endorsement by you or your publisher.
For Volume 10 No 2 (2013) and earlier, the following copyright applied:
Authors submitting a paper to UTSePress publications agree to assign a limited license to UTSePress if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license allows UTSePress to publish the manuscript in a specific issue.
Articles published by UTSePress are protected by copyright, with rights retained by the authors, who assert their moral rights. Authors control translation and reproduction rights to their works published by UTSePress. All rights are reserved worldwide by UTSePress, and downloads of specific portions are permitted for personal use only, not commercial use or resale.
For reprint or usage permissions, please direct inquiries to UTSePress via the journal's main editor, Dr. Nicholas Manganas at [portal.scholarly.journal@gmail.com]. Reprint permission requires acknowledgment of both UTSePress and PORTAL in the format advised by the journal editor.
References
Akkari, A. and Maleq, K. (2019). Global citizenship education: Buzzword or new instrument for
educational change? Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 176-182. https://doi.org/10.5964%2Fejop.v15i2.1999
Aktas, F., Pitts, K., Richards, J.C., and Silova, I. (2017). Institutionalizing global citizenship: A
critical analysis of higher education programs and curricula. Journal of Studies in Education, 21(1) 65-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315316669815
Boni, A., and Calabuig, C. (2015). Education for global citizenship at universities: Potentialities of
formal and informal learning spaces for cosmopolitanism. Journal of Studies in International Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315315602926
Bošnjaković, J., and Radionov, T. (2018). Empathy: Concepts, theories and
neuroscientific basis. Alcoholism and Psychiatry Research: Journal on Psychiatric Research and Addictions, 54(2), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.20471/dec.2018.54.02.04
Decety, J., Bartal, I. B., Uzefovsky, F., and Knafo-Noam, A. (2016). Empathy as a driver
of prosocial behaviour: Highly conserved neurobehavioural mechanisms across species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371(20150077). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0077
Efthymiou, L. (2023). A case study of the role of pre-departure training in study abroad
experiences. Theses and Dissertations. 645. https://scholar.stjohns.edu/theses_dissertations/645
Efthymiou, L., and Monahan, T. (2021). Virtual international program: Transformational
pedagogy for global participation. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 14(2), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v14i02/63-72
Gerdes, K. E., Lietz, C., and Segal, E. A. (2011). Measuring empathy in the 21st century:
The development of an empathy index rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and
social justice. Social Work Research, 35(2), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.83
Gladstein, G. A. (1983). Understanding empathy: Integrating counseling, developmental,
and social psychology perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30(4), 467-482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.30.4.467
Isaacs, T.I. (2018). Internationalism in global citizenship and education. In. Davies, I., Ho, L.-C.,
Jiang, Y., Yao, Y., Zhu, X. and Wang, S. (2021, December 2). The influence of college
students’ empathy on prosocial behavior in the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of social responsibility. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12(782246). https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyt.2021.782246
Lanzoni, S. (2015, October 15). A short history of empathy. The Atlantic.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/10/a-short-history-of-empathy/409912/
Monahan, T. (2017). The relevance of empathy to the intentionally inviting stance.
Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 23, 76-84. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184558
National Association of Colleges and Employers (2019). Measuring competency proficiency: The career readiness pilot project. https://www.naceweb.org/career-readiness/trends-and- predictions/measuring-competency-proficiency-the-career-readiness-pilot-project/
National Association of Colleges and Employers (2022). Career readiness defined. https://www.naceweb.org/career-readiness/competencies/career-readiness-
defined/NAFSA: National Association of International Educators (2022). https://www.nafsa.org/policy-and-advocacy/policy-resources/independent-research-measuring-impact-study-abroad
Robbins, J. (2007). Young children thinking and talking: Using sociocultural theory for
multi-layered analysis. Learning and Socio-cultural Theory: Exploring Modern Vygotskian Perspectives International Workshop 2007, 1(1). https://ro.uow.edu.au/llrg/vol1/iss1/3
Segal, E.A., Wagaman, M.A., and Gerdes, K.E. (2012). Developing the social empathy
index: An exploratory factor analysis. Advances in Social Work, 13(3), 541-560. https://doi.org/10.18060/2042
Shultz, L. (2007). Educating for global citizenship: Conflicting agendas and understandings. The
Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53, 248-258.
Shute, T. (2020). Elizabeth Segal, Social empathy: The art of understanding others.
Journal of Social Work, 20(3), 389-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017319897207
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A., and Ratner., H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and
Brain Sciences, 16(3), 495-511. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0003123X
Tudge, J. R. H., and Winterhoff. P.A. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura:
Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Development, 36, 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000277297
Woolfolk, A. E. (1998). Educational psychology. Allyn & Bacon.
Zhou, M., and Brown, D. (2015, Spring). Educational learning theories (2nd ed.). Educational
Open Textbooks. https://oer.galileo.usg.edu/education-textbooks/1