Causing a Ruckus: Complicity and Performance in Stories of Port Moody
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article is about the suicide of the chief of police of a small Canadian town, which - according to some - did not actually happen. While employed as a researcher and writer with a museum in Port Moody, British Columbia, the author heard this story as one of many told by the ‘old-timers’ who assisted with the writing of a history book. The controversy over the potential suicide provided the means by which this article reflects on issues of ethics, advocacy, and performance when doing public history. The main request of the old-timers was to ‘put the good stories in’ when writing the book. This expectation caused tension between the author and the museum, reflecting the divide between doing ‘history’ and ‘heritage’. This article draws on Anthropological theories of ‘complicity’ and performance in storytelling to make sense of the author’s role within the context of a museum working to record the stories of long-time residents. The stories of the old-timers were filtered through the lens of early 20th century ideas about gender, race, and class, and affected by a lingering frontier mentality. As such, they wished to see their town’s history told in a very specific way. The story of the police chief’s suicide betrayed this intent, allowing for an analysis of how these expectations can affect the way in which public history is done.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit articles to this journal from 31st March 2014 for publication, agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
For Vol 20 (2013) and before, the following copyright applied:
Authors submitting articles to UTSePress publications agree to assign a limited license to UTSePress if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license allows UTSePress to publish a manuscript in a given issue. Articles published by UTSePress are protected by copyright which is retained by the authors who assert their moral rights. Authors control translation and reproduction rights to their works published by UTSePress. UTSePress publications are copyright and all rights are reserved worldwide. Downloads of specific portions of them are permitted for personal use only, not for commercial use or resale. Permissions to reprint or use any materials should be directed to UTSePress.
References
Michael Frisch, A Shared Authority: Essays on the Craft and Meaning of Oral and Public History, State University of New York, Albany, 1990.
David Lowenthal, Possessed by the Past: The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History, Free Press, New York, 1996.
Leon Fink, ‘When Community Comes Home to Roost: The Southern Milltown as Lost Cause’, in Journal of Social History, vol 40, no 1, 2006, pp119-45.
Steven High, ‘Sharing Authority in the Writing of Canadian History: The Case of Oral History’, in Christopher Dummitt and Michael Dawson (eds), Contesting Clio’s Craft: New Directions and Debates in Canadian History, Institute of Latin American Studies, London, 2009.
Margaret Conrad, ‘Public History and its Discontents or History in the Age of Wikipedia’, in Journal of the CHA, vol 18, no 1, 2007.
Andrée Gendreau, ‘Museums and Media: A View from Canada’, in The Public Historian, vol 31, no 1, 2009.
D.M. Norton, Early History of Port Moody, Hancock House, Blaine, Washington, 1987.
Frederick Turner, Beyond Geography: The Western Spirit Against the Wilderness, Viking Press, New York, 1980.
Roderick Nash, Wilderness and the American Mind, Yale University Press, New Haven, 2001.
Michael Frisch, ‘Working-Class Public History in the Context of Deindustrialization: Dilemmas of Authority and the Possibilities of Dialogue’, in Labour/LeTravail, vol 51, 2003.
Jeremy Brecher, ‘How I Learned to Quit Worrying and Love Community History: A “Pet Outsider’s” Report on the Brass Workers History Project’, in Radical History Review, vol 28-30, 1984.
Donald Messerschmidt (ed), Anthropologists at Home in North America: Methods and Issues in the Study of One’s Own Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981.
Kirin Narayan, ‘How Native is a “Native” Anthropologist?’ in American Anthropologist, vol 95, no 3, 1993.
John L. Jackson Jr., Real Black: Adventures in Racial Sincerity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005.
Anna Sheftel and Stacey Zembrzychi, ‘Introduction’, in Anna Sheftel and Stacey Zembrzychi (eds), Oral History Off the Record: Toward an Ethnography of Practice, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2013.
Nicole Neatby and Peter Hodgins, ‘Introduction’, in Nicole Neatby and Peter Hodgins (eds), Settling and Unsettling Memories: Essays in Canadian Public History, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2012.
Anne O’Connell, ‘An Exploration of Redneck Whiteness in Multicultural Canada’, in Social Politics, vol 17, no 4, 2010, pp536-63.
Carrol Clarkson, ‘Who Are ‘We’? Don’t Make Me Laugh’, in Law Critique, vol 18, 2007, pp361-74.
Carol Schick, ‘White Resentment in Settler Society’, in Race Ethnicity and Education, vol 17, no 1, 2014, pp88-102.
Fred Ungless, ‘Port Moody Recollections’, in Port Moody Station Museum archives, 2011.015.001 (undated).
Sharon Babaian, ‘So Far, So Good: Ethics and the Government Historian’, in The Pubic Historian, vol 28, no 1, 2006.
Rebecca Conard, ‘Editor’s Introduction’, in The Public Historian, vol 28, no 1, 2006.
Alexander Freund, Kristina R. Llewellyn and Nolan Reilly, ‘Introduction’, in Alexander Freund, Kristina R. Llewellyn and Nolan Reilly (eds), The Canadian Oral History, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal and Kingston, 2015.
Margaret Conrad, Jocelyn Létourneau, and David Northrup, ‘Canadians and Their Pasts: An Exploration in Historical Consciousness’, in The Public Historian, vol 31, no 1, 2009.
George Marcus, Ethnography Through Thick and Thin, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1998.
Linda Shopes, ‘Sharing Authority’, in The Oral History Review, vol 30, no 1, 2003.
Deepa Reddy, ‘Caught! The Predicaments of Ethnography in Collaboration’, in James Faubion and George Marcus (eds), Fieldwork is Not What it Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, 2009.
Henry Greenspan and Sidney Bolkosky, ‘When is an Interview an Interview? Notes From Listening to Holocaust Survivors’, in Poetics Today, vol 27, no 2, 2006, pp431-49.
Audra Simpson, ‘On Ethnographic Refusal’, in Junctures, vol 9, 2007, pp67-80.
Daniel Bradburd, ‘Fuzzy Boundaries and Hard Rules: Unfunded Research and the IRB’, in American Ethnologist, vol 33, no 4, 2006.
Richard Bauman, Story, Performance, and Event, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.
Keith Sawyer, Creating Conversations: Improvisation in Everyday Discourse, Hampton Press, New York, 2001.
Luke Lassiter, The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005.
Jo Blatti, ‘Harry Miller’s Vision of Arkansas, 1900-1910: A Case Study in Sponsored Projects’, in The Public Historian, vol 28, no 1, 2006.
Karl Heider, ‘The Rashomon Effect: When Ethnographers Disagree’, in American Anthropologist, vol 90, no 1, 1988.