There is no ‘I’ in Team: Reflections on Team-Based Content Development at the National Museum of Australia

Guy Hansen

doi:10.5130/phrj.v17i0.1835

PDF

Published: Dec 22, 2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/phrj.v17i0.1835

Keywords:

public history, content development, team based model, National Museum of Australia

Guy Hansen

Abstract

In recent years one of the most important trends in the development of history exhibitions in major museums has been the use of interdisciplinary project teams for content development. This approach, often referred to as the team based model of content development, has, in many institutions, replaced older models of exhibition production built around the expertise of the curator. The implementation of team based models has had a profound impact on the way exhibitions are produced. When done well it has helped deliver exhibitions combining a strong focus on audience needs with in-depth scholarship and collections research. In some contexts, however, the tyranny of the team has given rise to a form of museological trench warfare in which different stakeholders struggle for creative control of an exhibition. In this article I will explore some aspects of the team based approach with reference to the development of the opening suite of exhibitions for the National Museum of Australia (NMA) in 2001. My observations are drawn from my experience as the lead curator of the Nation Gallery, one of the NMA’s opening exhibitions.

Issue

Vol. 17 (2010)

Section

Articles (PEER REVIEWED)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Authors who submit articles to this journal from 31st March 2014 for publication, agree to the following terms:

a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.

d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.

Authors submitting articles to UTSePress publications agree to assign a limited license to UTSePress if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license allows UTSePress to publish a manuscript in a given issue. Articles published by UTSePress are protected by copyright which is retained by the authors who assert their moral rights. Authors control translation and reproduction rights to their works published by UTSePress. UTSePress publications are copyright and all rights are reserved worldwide. Downloads of specific portions of them are permitted for personal use only, not for commercial use or resale. Permissions to reprint or use any materials should be directed to UTSePress.

References

Bennett, T. 1995. The Birth of the Museum, London, Routledge.

Crozier, B. & Gregory, H. 2003. Creating "A Lot On Her Hands". Labour History, 89-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/27515929

Davison, G. 2006. Museums and the culture wars: In defence of civic pluralism. Open Museums Journal, 8, 9.

DIVINE, M. 2001. A Nation Trivialised. Daily Telegraph, 12 March.

Gillespie, R. 2001. Making an exhibition: One gallery, one thousand objects, one million critics. Meanjin, 60, 111-48.

Gurian, E. H. 2006. Civilizing the Museum: The Collected Writings of Elaine Heumann Gurian, London and New York, Routledge.

Hansen, G. 2004. White Hot History. Public History Review, 11, 39-51.

HANSEN, G. 2005. Telling the Australian Story at the National Museum of Australia. History Australia, 2, 90.1-90.9.

Healy, C. 1997. From the Ruins of Colonialism: History as Social Memory, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne, Cambridge University Press.

HEALY, C. & WITCOMB, A. (eds.) 2006. South Pacific Museums: Experiments in Culture, Melbourne, Sydney: Monash ePress.

Hooper-Greenhill, E. 1994. Museums and their Visitors London, New York, Routledge.

Kavanagh, G. 1990. History Curatorship, London, Leicester University Press.

Leon, W. & Rosenzweig, R. 1989. History Museums in the United States, Urbana, University of Illinois Press.

Lord, B. & Dexter, G. 2002. The Manual of Museum Exhibitions, Walnut Creek, CA, AltaMira Press.

LOWENTHAL, D. 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country Cambridge University Press.

Lumley, R. 1988. The Museum time-machine: putting cultures on display, London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358825

Message, K. 2006. New Museums and the Making of Culture, Oxford and New York, Berg.

MORGAN, J. 2001. Howard's man: "Those people are not my heroes. Sydney Morning Herald, 5 June.

Morris, M. 2002. Recent Trends in Exhibition Development. Exhibitionist, 21, 8-11.

NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AUSTRALIA 2001-2. Annual Report.

RALPH APPELBAUM ASSOCIATES 1997. National Museum of Australia: a casebook of concepts, Ralph Appelbaum Associates.

UNKNOWN. 2009. What was it like: A perspective on history in museums. Paper Presented to the National Museum of Australia Collections Symposium.

Vergo, P. 1989. The New museology, London, Reaktion Books.

Wallace, M. 1986. Visiting the past: History museums in the United States. In: Rosenzweig, R., Benson, S. & Brier, S. (eds.) Presenting the Past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Wehner, K. & Sear, M. 2009. Engaging the material world; object knowledge and Australian Journeys. In: Dudley, S. (ed.) Museum Materialities: Objects, Engagements, Interpretations. Routledge.

Windschuttle, K. 2001. How not to run a museum: people's history at the postmodern museum. Quadrant, 45, 19.

WITCOMB, A. 2003. Re-Imagining the Museum: Beyond the Mausoleum, London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203361023

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

Abstract

Article Details

References