The Indigenous Struggle against ‘New’ Extractivism in the Peruvian Amazon
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
At the root of much of the deforestation, land rights violations, human rights abuses and ultimately the continuation of unequal, neocolonial North-South relations are the two-fold phenomena of global market pressures for extractivism and mass production of resources and the militarization of response to social conflicts created by these activities. We will investigate the ‘new’ extractivism economic activities from the perspective of the violence perpetrated by assemblages of power against indigenous protest movements in the Peruvian Amazon region. Specifically, we will probe a grassroots’ response to the way Peru’s elites have integrated the country within the global economic system: we focus on Indigenous peoples’ protests in 2008-9 against the new regulation to open the Amazon for development of resources by private companies carried out by Peru’s President Alan García, on the grounds that it represented a threat to their natural resources and livelihood.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit articles to this journal from 31st March 2014 for publication, agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
For Volume 5 No 3 (2013) and before, the following copyright applied:
Authors submitting articles to UTSePress publications agree to assign a limited license to UTSePress if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license allows UTSePress to publish a manuscript in a given issue. Articles published by UTSePress are protected by copyright which is retained by the authors who assert their moral rights. Authors control translation and reproduction rights to their works published by UTSePress. UTSePress publications are copyright and all rights are reserved worldwide. Downloads of specific portions of them are permitted for personal use only, not for commercial use or resale. Permissions to reprint or use any materials should be directed to UTSePress.
References
Ayelazuno, Jasper Abembia. “The ‘New Extractivism’ in Ghana: A Critical Review of Its Development Prospects.” The Extractive Industries and Society 1, no. 2 (November 2014): 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2014.04.008.
Bashirov, Galib. “New Extractivism and Failed Development in Azerbaijan.” Third World Quarterly 42, no. 8 (August 3, 2021): 1829–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1926968.
Brady, Michelle. “Ethnographies of Neoliberal Governmentalities: From the Neoliberal Apparatus to Neoliberalism and Governmental Assemblages.” Foucault Studies, October 17, 2014, 11–33. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i18.4649.
Burchardt, Hans-Jürgen, and Kristina Dietz. “(Neo-)Extractivism – a New Challenge for Development Theory from Latin America.” Third World Quarterly 35, no. 3 (March 16, 2014): 468–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.893488.
Carlsen, Laura, and John Feffer. “Trade Agreement Kills Amazon Indians.” Foreign Policy in Focus (blog), June 18, 2009. https://fpif.org/trade_agreement_kills_amazon_indians/.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
teleSUR. “Dozens of Indigenous Absolved in Peru’s 2009 ‘Baguazo’ Massacre,” September 22, 2016. https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Dozens-of-Indigenous-Absolved-for-Perus-2009-Baguazo-Massacre-20160922-0021.html.
Farthing, Linda, and Nicole Fabricant. “Open Veins Revisited: The New Extractivism in Latin America, Part 2.” Latin American Perspectives 46, no. 2 (March 2019): 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X18822509.
Finer, Matt, Clinton N. Jenkins, Melissa A. Blue Sky, and Justin Pine. “Logging Concessions Enable Illegal Logging Crisis in the Peruvian Amazon.” Scientific Reports 4, no. 1 (May 2015): 4719. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04719.
Grove, Jairus Victor. Savage Ecology: War and Geopolitics at the End of the World. Durham: Duke University Press, 2019.
Gudynas, Eduardo. “Diez tesis urgentes sobre el nuevo extractivismo. Contextos y demandas bajo el progresismo sudamericano actual.” In Extractivismo, política y sociedad, 187–225. Quito, Ecuador: CAAP/CLAES, 2009.
Hamouchene, Hamza. “The Political Ecology of Extractivism in North Africa.” In The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies, edited by Paul Bowles and Henry Veltmeyer, Second edition. Routledge Critical Development Studies. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2022.
Hughes, Neil. “Indigenous Protest in Peru: The ‘Orchard Dog’ Bites Back.” Social Movement Studies 9, no. 1 (January 2010): 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830903442550.
Jensen, Jacob. Marketizers: Public Choice and the Origins of the Neoliberal Order. Goldsmiths, University London, 2022.
Jurema, Bernardo. “The Making of Subservient States: U.S. Foreign Policy to Guatemala Through the Lenses of Diplomatic Cables.” Freie Universität Berlin, 2022.
Mármol, Camila del, and Ismael Vaccaro. “New Extractivism in European Rural Areas: How Twentieth First Century Mining Returned to Disturb the Rural Transition.” Geoforum 116 (November 2020): 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.012.
Marquardt, Kristina, Adam Pain, Örjan Bartholdson, and Luis Romero Rengifo. “Forest Dynamics in the Peruvian Amazon: Understanding Processes of Change.” Small-Scale Forestry 18, no. 1 (March 2019): 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-018-9408-3.
Martinez-Alier, Juan. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2002.
McArthur, Travis, and Todd Tucker. “A Year after Implementation of Peru Free Trade Agreement, U.S. and Peru Left with Broken Promises and No New Trade Model.” Washington, D.C.: Public Citizen, February 1, 2010. https://www.citizen.org/wp-content/uploads/perufta-oneyear.pdf.
Mezzadra, Sandro, and Brett Neilson. Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2013.
Ong, Aihwa, and Stephen J. Collier, eds. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
Onis, Ziya, Alice H. Amsden, Frederic C. Deyo, Chalmers Johnson, and Robert Wade. “The Logic of the Developmental State.” Comparative Politics 24, no. 1 (October 1991): 109. https://doi.org/10.2307/422204.
Orta-Martínez, Martí, and Matt Finer. “Oil Frontiers and Indigenous Resistance in the Peruvian Amazon.” Ecological Economics 70, no. 2 (December 2010): 207–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.022.
Panizza, Francisco. Contemporary Latin America: Development and Democracy beyond the Washington Consensus. London: Zed Books, 2009.
Peinhardt, Clint, Alisha A. Kim, and Viveca Pavon-Harr. “Deforestation and the United States–Peru Trade Promotion Agreement.” Global Environmental Politics 19, no. 1 (February 2019): 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00498.
Amnesty International. “Peru: Five Years on from Bagua Violence and Still No Justice for Victims,” June 5, 2014. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2014/06/peru-five-years-bagua-violence-and-still-no-justice-victims/.
www.macrotrends.net. “Peru GDP Growth Rate 1961-2022.” Accessed October 12, 2022. https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/PER/peru/gdp-growth-rate.
Human Rights Watch. “Peru: Investigate Violence in Bagua,” June 10, 2009. https://www.hrw.org/news/2009/06/10/peru-investigate-violence-bagua.
Office of the United States Trade Representative. “Peru Trade Promotion Agreement.” Government. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/peru-tpa.
Raftopoulos, Malayna. “Contemporary Debates on Social-Environmental Conflicts, Extractivism and Human Rights in Latin America.” The International Journal of Human Rights 21, no. 4 (2017): 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1301035.
Sánchez-Ancochea, Diego. “The Surprising Reduction of Inequality during a Commodity Boom: What Do We Learn from Latin America?” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 24, no. 2 (April 3, 2021): 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1628757.
Sassen, Saskia. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Updated ed., 4. print., 1. paperback print. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 2008.
Sícoli Pósleman, Claudia, and Jose M. Sallan. “Social License to Operate in the Mining Industry: The Case of Peru.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 37, no. 6 (November 2, 2019): 480–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1585142.
Stetson, George. “Oil Politics and Indigenous Resistance in the Peruvian Amazon: The Rhetoric of Modernity Against the Reality of Coloniality.” The Journal of Environment & Development 21, no. 1 (March 2012): 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496511433425.
Tetreault, Darcy. “The New Extractivism in Mexico: Rent Redistribution and Resistance to Mining and Petroleum Activities.” World Development 126 (February 2020): 104714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104714.
NACLA. “The Commission of Inquiry's Report on the Violent Events in Bagua, Peru: A Truth Commission with Little Truth.” Accessed July 22, 2022. https://nacla.org/news/commission-inquirys-report-violent-events-bagua-peru-truth-commission-little-truth.
Veltmeyer, Henry, James F. Petras, and Verónica Albuja. The New Extractivism: A Post-Neoliberal Development Model or Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century? London: Zed Books, 2014.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith, ed. The Developmental State. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 1999.
Workman, Daniel. “Peru’s Top 10 Exports.” World’s Top Exports (blog). Accessed October 12, 2022. https://www.worldstopexports.com/perus-top-10-exports/.