Main Article Content
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit articles to this journal from 31st March 2014 for publication, agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
For Volume 5 No 3 (2013) and before, the following copyright applied:
Authors submitting articles to UTSePress publications agree to assign a limited license to UTSePress if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license allows UTSePress to publish a manuscript in a given issue. Articles published by UTSePress are protected by copyright which is retained by the authors who assert their moral rights. Authors control translation and reproduction rights to their works published by UTSePress. UTSePress publications are copyright and all rights are reserved worldwide. Downloads of specific portions of them are permitted for personal use only, not for commercial use or resale. Permissions to reprint or use any materials should be directed to UTSePress.
Asay, M. 2009, ‘Shirky: Problem is filter failure, not info overload’ Available at http://www.cnet.com/news/shirky-problem-is-filter-failure-not-info-overload/
Carlson, M. 2015, ‘The robotic reporter: Automated journalism and the redefinition of labor, compositional forms, and journalistic authority’, Digital Journalism, vol.3, no. 3, pp. 416–431.
Carlson, M. 2017, ‘Automating judgment? Algorithmic judgment, news knowledge, and journalistic professionalism’, New Media & Society, DOI: 10.1177/1461444817706684
Clerwall, C. 2014, ‘Enter the Robot Journalist; Users' perceptions of automated content’, Journalism Practice vol.8, no. 5, pp. 519–531.
Deuze, M. and Witschge, T. 2017 ‘Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism’, Journalism, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884916688550
Desigaud, C., Howard, P. N., Bradshaw, S., Kollanyi, B. and Bolsolver, G. 2017, ‘Junk news and bots during the French Presidential election: What are French voters sharing over Twitter in round two? COMPROP Data Memo 2017.4/4 May 2017. http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/89/2017/05/What-Are-French-Voters-Sharing-Over-Twitter-Between-the-Two-Rounds-v7.pdf
Dörr, K. N. 2015 ‘Mapping the field of algorithmic journalism’, Digital Journalism, vol.4, no.6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1096748
Ericson, R.V., Baranek, M., Chan, J. B. L. 1987, Visualizing Deviance: A Study of News Organization, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1987.
Fogg, B. J. 2003, ‘Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online’, CHI ’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 722-723 ACM.
Gans, H. J. 1979, Deciding What’s News: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.
Gans, H. J. 2003, Democracy and the News, Oxford University Press, New York.
Gerbner, G. 1973, ‘Cultural indicators: The third voice’, in Gerbner, G. and Gross, L. (eds.). Communication Technology and Social Policy, New York: John Wiley, pp. 555–573.
Görke, A. and Scholl A. 2007, ‘Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems and journalism research’, Journalism Studies, vol. 7, no.4, pp. 644–655.
Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch F, Mellado C. et al. 2011, ‘Mapping journalism cultures across nations’, Journalism Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 273–293.
Harsin, J. 2015, ‘Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies’, Communication, Culture & Critique, vol. 8, no.2 pp. 327–333.
Hellmueller, L. and Mellado, C. 2015, ‘Professional roles and news construction: A media sociology conceptualization of journalists’ role conception and performance’, Communication & Society, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1–11.
Himma-Kadakas, M. and Palmiste, G., 2017, ‘Expectations and the actual performance of skills in online journalism’, Journal of Baltic Studies, [forthcoming].
Hovland, C. I. and Weiss, W. 1951, ‘The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness’, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 635–650. [Available at http://synapse.princeton.edu/~sam/hovland_weiss_source-credibility-Public-Opinion-Quarterly-1951-52.pdf ]
Jacoby, J., Speller D.E. & Berning, C.K. 1974, ‘Brand choice behavior as a function of information load: Replication and extension’, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 1, no. 1. pp. 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1086/208579
Jessen, J. and Jørgensen, A. H. 2011, ‘Aggregated trustworthiness: Redefining online credibility through social validation’, First Monday, vol.17, no.1. [Available at http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3731/3132]
Karlsson, M. 2011, ‘The immediacy of online news, the visibility of journalistic processes and a restructuring of journalistic authority’, Journalism, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 279–295.
Khaldarova, I. and Pantti, M. 2016, ‘Fake News’, Journalism Practice, vol. 10, no.7, pp. 891-901.
Laakaniemi, R. 1995, Newswriting in Transition, Nelson-Hall, Chicago.
Leith, D. 2013, ‘Representations of the concept of trust in the literature of Library and Information Studies’ Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal, vol.5, no.3, pp.54-74.
Leheste, G. 2012, Veebiajakirjanike tööd mõjutavad tegurid, Bakalaureusetöö. Tartu ülikool, ajakirjanduse ja kommunikatsiooni instituut.
Linden, C-G, 2017, ‘Decades of automation in the newsroom’, Digital Journalism, vol.5, no. 2, pp. 123-140.
Loit, U. and Siibak, A. 2013, Mapping Digital Media: Estonia. A Report by the Open Society Foundations. [Available at: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/mapping-digital-media-estonia-20130903.pdf ]
McManus, J.H. 1994, Market Driven Journalism: Let the Citizen Beware, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1994.
Mellado, C., Hellmueller, L. and Donsbach, W. 2016, ‘Journalistic role performance; A new research agenda in a digital and global media environment’, in Mellado, C., Hellmueller, L. and Donsbach, W. (eds), Journalistic role performance: concepts, contexts, and methods. New York: Routledge, 2016, pp. 2-21.
Mitrokhin, N. 2015, ‘Infiltration, instruction, invasion: Russia’s War in the Donbass’ Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 219–249.
Meyrowitz, J. 1985, No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behaviour. Oxford University Press, New York.
Napoli, P. M. 2014, ‘Automated media: An institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption’, Communication Theory, vol. 24, no.3, pp. 340–360.
Narayan, B. 2013, ‘From everyday information behaviours to clickable solidarity in a place called social media’, Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal, vol.5, no.3, pp.32-53. [Available at: http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/mcs/article/view/3488/3852]
Oxford Dictionaries, definition ‘fact’ [Available at: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/fact]
Picard, R. 2015, ‘Deficient tutelage: Challenges of contemporary journalism education’, in: Allen, G et al. (eds.) Toward 2020: New Directions in Journalism Education, Ryerson Journalism Research Centre, Toronto.
Rich, C. 2000, Writing and Reporting News. A Coaching Method, Wadsworth, Chicago.
Schlesinger, P. 1978, Putting ‘Reality’ Together: BBC News, Methuen, London, 1978.
Sigal, L. V. 1973, Reporters and Officials: The Organization and Politics of Newsmaking, D. C. Heath, Lexington, MASS.
Thomas, T. 2014, Russia’s information warfare strategy: Can the nation cope in future conflicts? The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, vol. 27, no.1, pp.1001-130.
Tuchman, G. 1980, Making News. A Study in the Construction of Reality, The Free Press, New York.
Van Dalen, A. 2012, ‘The algorithms behind the headlines’, Journalism Practice, vol. 6, nos.5-6, pp. 648-658.
Van Der Haak, B., Parks, M. & Castells, M. 2012, ‘The future of journalism: Networked journalism’, International Journal of Communication, vol. 6, pp. 2923–2938.
Van der Kaa, H., Krahmer, E. 2014, ‘Journalist versus News Consumer: The perceived credibility of machine written news’, in Proceedings of the Computation + Journalism Conference, Columbia University, New York, 24-25 October. [Available at: http://compute-cuj.org/cj-2014/cj2014_session4_paper2.pdf]
Vobič, I. and Milojević, A. 2014, ‘ “What we do is not actually journalism”: Role negotiations in online departments of two newspapers in Slovenia and Serbia’, Journalism, vol 15, no. 8, pp. 1023-1040.
Willnat, L., Weaver, D. and Choi. J. 2013, ‘The global journalist in the twenty-first century’, Journalism Practice, vol. 7, no. 2, pp 163–183.