Revisiting Reading: Exploring an intensive reading pedagogy in adult literacy
Main Article Content
Abstract
had a considerable impact in recent decades on the pedagogy of writing in
all sectors of education in Australia, from early schooling to post-secondary
and workplace contexts (eg. Christie and Martin 1997). Attending to the
social purpose of language and modelling and deconstructing texts in
preparation for supported writing has become a common feature of many
programs, including those in the field of adult English as a Second
Language (ESL) and adult literacy. However, effective engagement with
model texts for writing is dependent on students being able to read those
texts. While reading continues to be explicitly identified as a component of
most adult literacy programs, there is evidence to suggest that less attention
may be given to the deliberate supported development of reading skills
(Burns and de Silva Joyce 2000, 2005). This paper reports on a project
funded by the National Centre for Vocational Education Research
(NCVER) in Australia. The study, Investigating the impact of intensive reading
pedagogy in adult literacy, was designed to explore the relevance and the
potential of an intensive, explicit reading pedagogy, Reading-to-Learn, in adult
and community education (ACE) and TAFE colleges in metropolitan
Sydney, teaching literacy in ESL and adult basic education (ABE) classes.
The study was a partnership between practising teachers and
researcher/teacher educators. It identified positive outcomes for students,
with advances in reading abilities for many students well beyond those
anticipated by teachers and students alike. Teachers also reported very
positive outcomes for their own professional development. Importantly, the
study also identified a number of system-level features that would need to be
in place to support a broader adoption of the pedagogy.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.