From Smokebush to Spinifex: Indigenous traditional knowledge and the commercialisation of plants

Article Sidebar

PDF HTML
Published: Mar 28, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/ijrlp.1.2018.5713
Keywords:
indigenous culture, traditional knowledge, intellectual property, law

Main Article Content

Terri Janke
Terri Janke & Company Pty Ltd

Abstract

Indigenous Australians, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, have diverse relationships with plants and their seeds. This cultural knowledge has been passed on through the generations, creating a deep history that has produced sophisticated fields of knowledge intimately linked to both diverse cultural geographies and the natural environment across the country. Western scientific, government and private sector commercial institutions have been collecting Australian plant material for over 200 years. Sometimes, such ‘collectors’ obtain the Indigenous knowledge simultaneously with the plant material. On occasions, the culturally-based Indigenous ownership of that knowledge is acknowledged by collectors. However in the majority of instances that has not been the case. Furthermore, different western institutions take different approaches to the collection, management and use of Australian plant material and associated Indigenous plant knowledge. A particular challenge in this arena is the lack of any shared understanding of Indigenous knowledge and intellectual property issues that are involved, and how those might best be addressed. But there is a gathering momentum, from diverse quarters, to face such challenges. This paper aims to contribute to consideration of the issues involved in order to promote more robust inclusion of Indigenous rights, interests and concerns.

Article Details

Issue
No. 1 (2018): Unthemed articles and commentaries
Section
Articles (PEER REVIEWED)
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Terri Janke, Terri Janke & Company Pty Ltd

Terri Janke is a Wuthathi/Meriam woman from Cairns. She is the Solicitor Director of Terri Janke and Company, a commercial law firm that specialises in Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property (ICIP). She empowers Indigenous people so they prosper. Terri advises on legal matters including incorporation, joint venture, procurement, governance, employment and engagement. She is an international authority on ICIP and has written the leading protocols and ICIP models in the film, arts, museum and archival sector. She is valued mentor, an advocate for Indigenous business, an accredited mediator and governance expert.

References

Blakeney, Michael, ‘Bioprospecting and the Protection of Traditional Medical Knowledge’ (1997) 6 European Intellectual Property Reports

Blakeney, Michael, “Bioprospecting and the Protection of Traditional Medical Knowledge”, Symposium on Intellectual Property Protection for the Arts and Cultural Expression of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People, Brisbane, 28 September 1996

Corrick, Margaret G and Bruce Alexander Fuhrer, Wildflowers of Southern Western Australia (Rosenberg Pub, 3rd ed, 2009)

Davis, Michael, ‘Biological Diversity and Indigenous Knowledge’ (Research Paper No 17, Parliamentary Library, Parliament of Australia, 1998)

Drahos, Peter, ‘The Kimberley: big projects, little projects’ Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and their Knowledge (Cambridge University Press, 2014)
Drahos, Peter, Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and their Knowledge, (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

Gorman, Julian and Peter Whitehead- Researchers (for the Joint Venture Agroforestry Program), Small-scale Commercial Plant Harvests by Indigenous Communities, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, 2006
Gray, Stephan, ‘Vampires Round the Campfire’ Alternative Law Journal (1997) 22(2)
Howden, Kirsten, ‘Indigenous Traditional Knowledge and Native Title’ UNSW Law Journal 24(1) http://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/12_howden.pdf

Janke, Terri, Our Culture: Our Future: Report on Australian Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights, (Michael Frankel and Company, 1998)
Kerr, Phillip G, ‘Biopiracy in Australia – Sound Biopractice or Biopiracy?’ Social Alternatives (2010) 29(3)

Langton, Marcia, Z Ma Rhea, M Ayre and J Pope, ‘Composite Report of the status and trends regarding knowledge, innovations and practices of Indigenous local communities’ UNEP/CBD/WG8J/3/INF/4, (UNEP, CBD, 2003)

Lingard, Kylie, Legal and Institutional Strategies to Support the Interests of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in Bush Food Commercialisation (University of New England, 2015) 2 http://www.nintione.com.au/resource/LingardK_PhD(abridged)_StrategiesSupportAboriginalTorresStraitIslanderPeoplesBushFoodCommercialisation.pdf

Marshall, Virginia, Terri Janke & Antony Watson, ‘Community Economic Development in Patenting Traditional Knowledge – A Case Study of the Mudjala TK Project in the Kimberley Region of Western Australia’ Indigenous Law Bulletin (2013) 8(6)

Memmott, Paul (2013). Bio-architectural technology and the Dreamtime knowledge of spinifex grass. In: Stephen Kajewski, Karen Manley and Keith Hampson, Proceedings of the 19th CIB World Building Congress, Brisbane 2013: Construction and Society. CIB WBC13: 19th World Building Congress 2013, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, (1-14). 5-9 May, 2013

Mgbeoji, Ikechi, Global Biopiracy, Patents, Plants and Indigenous Knowledge, (Cornell University Press, 2006)

Pascoe, Bruce, Dark Emu (Magabala Books, 2014)

Rimmer, Matthew, ‘Blame it on Rio: Biodiscovery, Native Title, and Traditional Knowledge’ Aboriginal Policy Research Consortium International (2003)

Robinson, Daniel, Confronting Biopiracy: Challenges, Cases and International Debates (Earthscan from Routledge, 2010)

Robinson, Daniel, United Nations University, ‘Traditional Knowledge and Biological Product Derivative Patents’, http://www.unutki.org/news.php?doc_id=174

Shepheard, Mark, Indigenous knowledge stewardship and accountability of seed bank institutions, http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/ijrlp/article/view/4629/5423

Shiva, Vandana and Radha Holla-Bhar, 'Intellectual piracy and the neem tree', The Ecologist (1993) 23(6)

Sieni, Monica Michelle, Bioprospecting and Access to Indigenous Flora: Policy Implications of Consented Ways of ‘Knowing’ and ‘Owning’ (Griffith University, 2003) https://www120.secure.griffith.edu.au/rch/file/e8a64575-073e-380f-d9b9-2d9e223930d6/1/02Main.pdf

Simpson, Tony, Draft Report prepared on behalf of the Forest Peoples Programme, The Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights of Indigenous Peoples, June 1997

Stoianoff, Natalie, and Alpana Roy, ‘Indigenous Knowledge and Culture in Australia- The Case for Sui Generis Legislation’ (2015) 41(3) Monash University Law Review

Taubman, Anthony, ‘Preface: Indigenous Innovation: New Dialogues, New Pathways’ Indigenous Peoples Innovation xix .

The University of Queensland, Native Grass Could be key to super-thin condoms (10 February 2016), https://www.uq.edu.au/news/article/2016/02/native-grass-could-be-key-super-thin-condoms

University of South Australia, Medicinal plants project impresses Business and Higher Education Round Table (2013), http://w3.unisa.edu.au/unisanews/2013/December/story8.asp


Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Regional Seas Claim Group v Commonwealth (2013) 300 ALR 1

Commonwealth v Yarmirr (2001) 208 CLR 1

National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents (1990) 102 CLR 252

Western Australia v Ward (2002) 213 CLR 1

Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 (Vic)

Biological Resources Act 2011 (NT)

Conservation and Land Management Act 1984 (WA)

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conversation Regulations 2000 (Cth)

National Parks and Wildlife Act (WA)

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)

Patents Act 1990 (Cth)

Plant Breeders Rights Act 1994

Regulation 8A.06 (1) of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conversation Regulations 2000 (Cth)


Convention on Biological Diversity. 1992. United Nations.

Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization (ABS) to the Convention on Biological Diversity, opened for signature 2 February 2011 (entered into force 12 October 2014), Art 6(1)