Main Article Content
In 2013, the Singapore government announced a plan to build the Cross Island Line (CRL), the country’s eighth Mass Rapid Transit train line. Since its release, the proposal has caused ongoing heated debate as it involves going underneath Singapore’s largest remaining reserve: the Central Catchment Nature Reserve. Following extended discussions with environmental groups, the transport authority later stated that they would now consider two route options: a direct alignment running underneath the Central Reserve, and an alternative route that skirts the reserve boundary. The authority warned that the skirting option could increase the construction cost significantly and cost commuters an extra few minutes of travel time. Intriguingly, in contrast to the underground rail project that threatens to further fragment the Central Reserve, another, more visible, repair work is taking place at the edge of the same reserve, aiming to reconnect fragmented habitat through an eco-bridge. Through these two seemingly contrasting yet intimately related case studies in a highly developed city-state, this article explores the complexity and ambivalence of urban movement and its entanglement with development, techonology and urban natures. How are the discourses of urban mobility directed by the desire for ‘velocity’, the politics of invisibility, and a fixation on certainty? What might it mean to reconfigure contemporary practices and ethics towards multispecies movements in an increasingly urbanised environment? Amid the growing expansions of infrastructure and public transportation in Singapore and around the world, often in the name of sustainability and liveability, this article unsettles some taken-for-granted, velocity-charged and human-centred approaches to urban movement and explores the serious need to craft new possibilities for a more inclusive and flourishing urban movement.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed undera Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
Barker, E.W., Minister for Law, the Environment and Science and Technology, ‘ACQUISITION OF PRIVATE CEMETERIES’, Parliament of Singapore, vol. 37, 7 Apr 1978. https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/ topic?reportid=013_19780407_S0004_T0006
Barter, P., ‘Singapore’s Urban Transport: Sustainability by Design or Necessity?’, in Tai-Chee Wong, Belinda Yuen and Charles Goldblum (eds), Spatial planning for a sustainable Singapore, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2008, pp. 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6542-2_6
Barter, P., ‘Singapore’s Mobility Model: Time for an Update?’, in IFMO (ed), Megacity Mobility Culture: How Cities Move on in a Diverse World, Springer Heidelberg, Berlin, 2013. pp. 225-242. http://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-642-34735-1_12
Bennett, A., Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation, IUCN, Cambridge, Gland, 1999.
Castelletta, M., J. Thiollay and N.S. Sodhi, ‘The Effects of Extreme Forest Fragmentation on the Bird Community of Singapore Island’, Biological Conservation, vol.121, no. 1, 2005, pp. 135-155. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.033
Centre for Liveable Cities Singapore and Civil Service College Singapore, Liveable and Sustainable Cities: A Framework, Centre for Liveable Cities Singapore, Singapore, 2014.
Chen, M., ‘How effective are wildlife corridors like Singapore’s Eco-Link?’, Mongabay, 26 July 2017. https://news.mongabay.com/2017/07/how-effective-are-wildlife-corridors-like-singapores-eco-link
Chew, H.M. and R. Pazos, ‘Animals Crossing Eco-Link@BKE: Safe passage for creatures over busy highway’, The Straits Times, 11 Dec 2015. http://graphics.straitstimes.com/STI/STIMEDIA/ Interactives/2015/11/feature-ecolink-BKE-national-parks/index.html
Chua, B.H., ‘Singapore as Model: Planning Innovation, Knowledge Experts’, in Roy, A. and A. Ong, (eds), Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, Malden, MA, 2011, pp. 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444346800.ch1
Conley, V.A., ‘Paul Virilio: Speed Space’, Spatial Ecologies: Urban Sites, State and World-Space in French Cultural Theory, Liverpool University Press, 2012, pp. 78–94. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vjc34.8
Cresswell, T., ‘Towards a Politics of Mobility’, Environment and Planning D Society and Space, vol. 28. 2010, pp.17-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d11407
Cresswell, T., ‘Mobilities III: Moving on’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 38, no. 5, 2014, pp.712-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514530316
Environmental Resources Management (S) Pte Ltd, ‘Environmental Impact Assessment on Central Catchment Nature reserve for the Proposed Cross Island Line, Site Investigation Environmental Impact Assessment Report - Volume III, Alignment Option 1’, Land Transport Authority, 2016.
Environmental Resources Management (S) Pte Ltd, Mandai Parks Holdings: Environment Impact Assessment, 2016, pp. 9-19.
Franklin, S., ‘Culturing Biology: Cell Lines for the Second Millennium’, Health, vol. 5, no. 3, 2001, pp. 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/136345930100500304
Garmendia, E., E. Apostolopoulou, W.M. Adams and D. Bormpoudakis, ‘Biodiversity and green infrastructure in Europe: Boundary object or ecological trap?’, Land use Policy, vol. 56, 2016, pp. 315-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.003
Gattinoni, P., E.M. Pizzarotti and L. Scesi, Engineering geology for underground works, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7850-4
Han, K., ‘Land-starved Singapore exhumes its cemeteries to build roads and malls’, The Guardian, 7 Aug 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/aug/07/land-starved-singapore-exhumes-its-cemeteries- to-build-roads-and-malls
Hinchliffe, S. and S. Lavau, ‘Differentiated Circuits: The Ecologies of Knowing and Securing Life’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 31, no. 2, 2013, pp. 259-274. https:// doi.org/10.1068/d6611
Hinchliffe, S. and S. Whatmore, ‘Living Cities: Towards a Politics of Conviviality’, Science as Culture, vol. 15, no. 2, 2006, pp. 123-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505430600707988
Hinchliffe, S., M. Keames, M. Degen and S. Whatmore, ‘Urban Wild Things: A Cosmopolitical Experiment’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 23, 2005, pp. 643-658. https://doi. org/10.1068/d351t
Hodgetts, T. and J. Lorimer, ‘Animals’ Mobilities’, Progress in Human Geography , Dec. 2018. https://doi. org/10.1177/0309132518817829
Jain, A. et al., ‘Moving Away from Paper Corridors in Southeast Asia: Editorial’, Conservation Biology, vol. 28, no. 4, 2014, pp. 889-891. http://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12313
Kearnes, M. and L. Rickards, ‘Earthly Graves for Environmental Futures: Techno-Burial Practices’, Futures, vol. 92, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.12.003
Koelle, A., ‘Intimate Bureaucracies: Roadkill, Policy, and Fieldwork on the Shoulder’, Hypatia, vol. 27, no. 3, 2012, pp. 651-669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01295.x
Kroll, G., ‘An Environmental History of Roadkill: Road Ecology and the Making of the Permeable Highway’, Environmental History, vol. 20, no. 1, 2015, pp. 4-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emu129
Land Transport Authority, Land Transport Master Plan 2013, Land Transport Authority, 2013. https:// www.lta.gov.sg/content/dam/ltaweb/corp/PublicationsResearch/files/ReportNewsletter/ LTMP2013Report.pdf
Land Transport Authority, ‘Cross Island Line C1001 Final SI EIA Executive Summary’, Land Transport Authority, 2016.
Land Transport Authority, ‘MITIGATING MEASURES TO PROTECT THE CCNR DURING SI
WORKS’, Land Transport Authority, 25 Oct 2016.
Leow, J., ‘The Future of Nostalgia: Reclaiming Memory in Tan Pin Pin’s Invisible City and Alfian Sa’at’s A History of Amnesia’, Journal of Commonwealth Literature, vol. 45, no.1, pp. 115-130, 2010. https://doi. org/10.1177/0021989409359859
Lorimer J., ‘Nonhuman charisma’, Environment and Planning D, vol. 25, 2017, pp. 911–932. https://doi. org/10.1068/d71j
Lin, W.Q., ‘Wasting time? The differentiation of travel time in urban transport’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 44, 2012, pp. 2477 – 2492. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4525
Lourdes Melo Zurita, M., P. Munro and D. Houston, ‘Un-earthing the Subterranean Anthropocene’,
Area, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/area.12369
Low, T., ‘Considering corridors’ Wildlife Australia, vol. 50, no. 4, Summer 2013, pp. 4-8. https:// search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;res=IELAPA;dn=737253329322414
The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA), ‘Premier Global Hub Port’, MPA, Singapore, 2017.
McFarlane, C., ‘Assemblage and critical urbanism’, City, vol. 15, no. 2, 2011, pp. 204-224. http://dx.doi.or g/10.1080/13604813.2011.568715
Moore, J.W., Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital, 1st ed., Verso, New York, 2015.
National Parks Board, ‘Central Catchment Nature Reserve’, National Parks, 2018.
National Climate Change Secretariat, Prime Minister’s Office , Singapore’s Climate Action Plan: Take Action Today, For a Carbon-Efficient Singapore, National Climate Change Secretariat, Prime Minister’s Office, 2016.
Nature Society (Singapore), Cross Island Line: Discussion and Position Paper, Nature Society (Singapore), 18 July 2013. https://www.nss.org.sg/report/d43e0c02-4(NSS)%20Cross-Island%20Line% 20Position%20Paper.pdf
Nature Society (Singapore), Nature Society’s Position Paper on the Mandai Safari Park Holdings (MSPH)’s Mandai Development Plan, 02 Sep 2016. https://www.nss.org.sg/documents/NSS%20Position
Ng, J.S., ‘Masterplan of Singapore’s underground spaces ready by 2019’, The Straits Times, 12 Feb 2018. http://www.straitstimes.com/politics/masterplan-of-spores-underground-spaces-ready-by-next-year
O’Dempsey, T., ‘Singapore’s Changing Landscape since c.1800’, Nature Contained: Singapore environmental history, in Timothy Barnard (ed), NUS Press, Singapore, 2014, pp. 17–48. https://doi. org/10.2307/j.ctv1nth2d.7
Palmer, C., ‘Placing Animals in Urban Environmental Ethics’, Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 34, no. 1, 2003, pp. 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9833.00165
Philomin, L., ‘Cross Island Line a key node, so keep open mind: Khaw’, Today, 01 Mar 2016. https:// www.todayonline.com/singapore/keep-open-mind-cross-island-line-plans-says-khaw
Plumwood, V., ‘Shadow Places and the Politics of Dwelling’, Australian Humanities Review 44, 2008, pp.139–50.
Ridder, B., and A. Davison, ‘Turbulent Times for Urban Nature: Conserving and Re-Inventing Nature in Australian Cities’, Australian Zoologist, vol. 33, no. 3, 2006, pp. 306–314. https://doi.org/10.7882/ AZ.2006.004
Scott, J.C., Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have Failed, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1998.
Singapore Department of Statistics, ‘Population and Population Structure’, Department of Statistics Singapore, 2018.
Singapore Government, ‘Questions on the Cross Island Line’, Singapore Government, 03 Mar 2016.
Singapore Government, ‘Oral Reply by Minister for Transport Khaw Boon Wan to Parliamentary Question on Cross Island Line Alignment’, Ministry of Transport, 29 Feb 2016. https://www.mot.gov.sg/ news-centre/news/Detail/Oral%20Reply%20by%20Minister%20for%20Transport%20Khaw%20Boon% 20Wan%20to%20Parliamentary%20Question%20on%20Cross%20Island%20Line%20Alignment/
Tan, A., ‘Call for “zero impact” for Cross Island MRT Line under MacRitchie nature reserve’, The Straits Times, 14 Feb 2016. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/environment/call-for-zero-impact-for-mrt- line-under-macritchie-nature-reserve.
Tan, A., ‘Mandai makeover: Eco-bridge, biodiversity classes for contractors among measures to protect wildlife in area’, The Straits Times, 26 July 2017. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/environment/ mandai-makeover-eco-bridge-biodiversity-classes-for-contractors-among-measures.
Tan, A., ‘Animals affected by Mandai park works: Wildlife groups’, The Straits Times, 24 Mar 2018. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/environment/animals-affected-by-mandai-park-works-wildlife- groups
Thulaja, N.R., ‘Gambier’, Singapore Infopedia, National Library Board, 2003.
Vartan, S., ‘How wildlife bridges over highways make animals—and people—safer’, National Geographic, 16 Apr 2019. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/2019/04/wildlife-overpasses-underpasses- make-animals-people-safer/
Virilio, P., Virilio live: Selected interviews, in John Armitage (ed), SAGE, London, 2001. https:// doi.org/10.4135/9781446220306.n8
Virilio, P., Speed and Politics, Mark Polizzotti (trans), Semiotext(e), Los Angeles, CA, 2006.
The World Bank, ‘Population density (people per sq. km of land area’, The World Bank, 2017.
Yahoo! Newsroom, ‘4,000 turn up at Speakers’ Corner for population White Paper protest’, Yahoo News, 16 Feb 2013. https://sg.news.yahoo.com/huge-turnout-at-speakers--corner-for-population-white-paper- protest-101051153.html