Messy Subjectivities: The Popular, Affective and Technical Consistencies of Early Nineteenth-Century Staffordshire Ware
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed undera Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
References
Benjamin, W., The Arcades Project, trans. H. Eiland and K. McLaughlin, The Belkmap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and London, 1999.
Benjamin, W., Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 1 1913–1926, ed. M. Bullock and M.W. Jennings, The Belkmap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and London, 1999.
Benjamin, W., Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 2 1927–1934, ed. M.W. Jennings, H. Eiland and G. Smith, The Belkmap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and London, 1999.
Bernstein, R., ‘Dances with Things: Material Culture and the Performance of Race’, Social Text, vol. 27, no. 4, 2009, pp. 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-2009-055.
Bourdieu, P., Distinction: A Critique of the Social Judgement of Taste, trans. R. Nice, The President and Fellows of Harvard College and Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., Cambridge, MA, 1984.
Buck-Morris, S., The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, and London, 1989.
Colley, L., ‘Whose Nation? Class and National Consciousness in Britain 1750–1830’, Past and Present, vol. 113, no. 1, 1986, pp. 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/past/113.1.97.
De Brabandere, N., ‘Experimenting with Affect in Drawing and Society’, Body and Society, vol. 22, n. 2, 2016, pp. 103–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X16640325.
Duby, G., Art and Society in the Middle-Ages, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2000.
Gretton, T., ‘“Art is Cheaper and goes Lower in France”: The Language of the Parliamentary Select Committee on the Arts and Principles of Design of 1835–6’, in Art in Bourgeois Society, 1790–1850, ed. A. Hemingway and W. Vaughn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 84–100.
Hay, D., P. Linebaugh, J.G. Rule, E.P. Thompson, C. Winslow, Albion’s Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth-Century England, 2nd Edition, Verso, London and New York, 1976.
Hemingway, A., ‘Marxism and Art History after the Fall of Communism’, in Art in Bourgeois Society, 1790–1850, ed. A. Hemingway and W. Vaughn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 229–51.
Jewitt, L., Jewitt’s Ceramic Art of Great Britain in 1800–1900, revised G. Goddin, Arco Publication Company, UK, 1972.
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B., Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums, and Heritage, University of California Press, California, 1998.
Kuchler, S., ‘Technological Materiality: Beyond the Dualist Paradigm’, Theory Culture Society, vol. 25, no. 1, 2008, pp. 101–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407085159.
Latour, B., ‘Visualization and Cognition: Drawing Things Together’, in Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, ed. H. Kuklick, Jai Press, no. 6, 1989, pp. 1–40.
Linklater, A. and S. Mennell, ‘Retrospective: Norbert Elias, The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations: An Overview and Assessment’, History and Theory, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 384–411.
Locke, J., The Second Treatise of Civil Government, 1690, Project Gutenberg EBook, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/7370/7370-h/7370-h.htm.
Lucas, G., ‘Reading Pottery: Literature and Transfer–Printed Pottery in the Early Nineteenth Century’, International Journal of Historical Archeology, vol. 7, no. 2, 2003, pp. 127–43.
Massumi, B., ‘The Autonomy of Affect’, Cultural Critique: The Politics of Systems and Environments, Part II, vol. 31, 1995, pp. 83–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354446.
Massumi, B., ‘The Thinking–Feeling of What Happens: the Semblance of a Conversation’ Inflexions— How is Research Creation? no. 1, 2008.
Manning, E., Always More Than One: Individuation’s Dance, Duke University Press, Durham and London, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395829.
Mitchell, W.J.T., ‘Imperial Landscape’, in Landscape and Power, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002, pp. 215–31.
Oatman-Stanford, H., ‘Murder and Mayhem in Miniature: The Lurid Side of Staffordshire Figurines’, Collectors Weekly, 2003 http://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/the-lurid-side-of-staffordshire-figurines.
Oliver, A., The Victorian Staffordshire Figure: A Guide for Collectors, BAS Printers Ltd., Wallop, Hampshire, 1971.
Ponsonby, M., Stories from Home: English Domestic Interiors, 1750–1850, Routledge, London and New York, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315610825.
Potts, A., ‘The Impossible Ideal: Romantic Conceptions of the Parthenon Sculptures in Early Nineteenth-century Britain and Germany’, in Art in Bourgeois Society, 1790–1850, ed. A. Hemingway and W. Vaughn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 101–22.
Pigg, S., ‘Inventing Social Categories through Place: Social Representations and Development in Nepal’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 34, no. 3, 1992, 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500017928.
Rawson, P., Ceramics, University of Pennsylvania Press, London and New York, 1984. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812207347.
Schkolne, M., People, Passions, Pastimes, and Pleasures: Staffordshire Figures 1810–1835, Hot Lane Press, 2013.
Silverman, C., ‘Trafficking in the Exotic with “Gypsy” Music: Balkan, Roma, Cosmopolitanism, and “World Music” Festivals’, in Balkan Popular Culture and other Ottoman Ecumene: Music, Image, and Regional Political Discourse, ed. D.A. Buchanan, Scarecrow Press, Lanham, 2007, pp. 335–61.
Tarlow, S. The Archeology of Improvement in Britain, 1750–1850, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511499708.
Thompson, E.P., Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture, The New Press, New York, 1991.
Wood, E.M., ‘The Agrarian Origins of Capitalism’ Monthly Review, vol. 50, no. 3, 2002, http://monthlyreview.org/1998/07/01/the-agrarian-origins-of-capitalism/.