Establishment of Performance Scales for Team Integration Assessment
The increased use of the alliance model in recent years highlights the importance of integration practice among multi-disciplinary teams, as it promotes a collaborative culture and the continuity of equitable relationships to improve project performance. If continuous improvement in project alliances is to be achieved through the use of integrated teams, then a means of assessing how well teams integrate and how team integration changes over time, needs to be introduced. In response to that need, an Alliance Team Integration Performance Index (ATIPI) has been developed as part of a wider study to develop an assessment tool for team integration in road construction alliance projects in New Zealand. In this paper, a set of Key Indicators (KIs) of team integration practice and the Quantitative Measures (QMs) for each KI are first introduced and then, in order to enhance the associated ATIPI model, the establishment of scales for the performance levels, namely ‘poor’, ‘average’, ‘good’, ‘very good’ and ‘excellent’, for each KI are described. The establishment of performance scales will help ensure that the assessment of team integration practice is quantified in a consistent and objective manner.
Keywords: Alliance, Assessment, New Zealand, Performance Scales, Team Integration
Baiden, B.K., Price, A.D.F & Dainty, A.R.J. 2006, 'The extent of team integration within construction projects', International Journal of Project Management, 24 (2), 13-23.
Bresnen, M. 2007, 'Deconstructing partnering in project-based organization: seven pillars, seven paradoxes and seven deadly sins', International Journal of Project Management, 25 (4), 365374.
Chow, L.K & Ng, S.T. 2007, 'Expectation of performance levels pertinent to consultant performance evaluation', International Journal of Project Management, 25, 90-103.
Dainty, A.R., Briscoe, G.H & Millet S.J. 2001, 'New perspectives on construction supply chain integration', Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6 (4), 163-173.
Hauck, J., Walker, D. H. T., Hampson, K.D & Peters, R.J. 2004, 'Project alliancing at national museum of Australia - collaborative process', Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130 (1), 143-152.
Ibrahim, K.I, Costello, S. B & Wilkinson, S. 2013a, 'Development of a conceptual alliance team integration performance index (ATIPI) for alliancing projects', Construction Management and Economics, 31(11), 1128-1143.
Ibrahim, K.I, Costello, S. B & Wilkinson, S. 2013b, 'Establishment of Quantitative Measures (QMs) for Team Integration Assessment of Alliance Projects in New Zealand', The 2nd International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering (ICCOEE 2014), 3 5 June 2014, Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre, Malaysia (Submitted).
Ibrahim, K.I, Costello, S. B & Wilkinson, S. 2013c, 'Key Practice Indicators of Team Integration in Construction Projects: A Review', Team Performance Management, 19 (3/4), pp. 132-152.
Ibrahim, C.K., Costello, S.B & Wilkinson, S. 2013d, 'Overview of key Indicators of team integration in Construction projects: New Zealand Practitioners' Point of View', Proceedings of the World Building Congress 2013, 5 9 May 2013, Queensland, Australia.
Jefferies, M., Brewer, G., Rowlinson, S., Cheung, F & Satchell, A. 2006, 'Project alliances in the Australian construction industry: a case Study of a water treatment project', Proc., Symposium on CIB W92: Sustainability and value through construction procurement, 29 November 2 December 2006, Digital World Centre, Salford, UK, 247- 284.
Laan, A., Noorderhaven, N., Voordijk, H & Dewulf, G. 2011, 'Building trust in construction partnering projects: An exploratory case-study', Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17, 98108.
Love, P.E.D., Mistry, D & Davis, P.R. 2010, 'Price Competitive Alliance Projects: Identification of Success Factors for Public Clients', Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136 (9), 947-956.
Ng, S.T & Chow, L.K. 2004, 'Framework for evaluating the performance of engineering consultants', Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130 (4), 280-288.
Pocock, J., Hyun, C.T., Liu, L. Y & Kim, M.K. 1996, 'Relationship between project interaction and performance indicators', Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122 (2), 165-176.
Rooney, G. 2009, 'Project alliancing: The process architecture of a relationship based project delivery system for complex infrastructure projects', http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1809267, viewed: 5 March 2012.
Ross, J. 2009, 'Alliance Contracting: Lessons Learned from the Australian Experience', Paper prepared for Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, the Association of German Engineers.
Salicru, S. 2010, 'Development and validation of the alliance psychological contract (APC) model and instrument', Proc., 27th International Congress of Applied Psychology (ICAP), 11-16 July 2010, Melbourne, Australia.
Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C & Chan, D. W. M. 2008, 'Establishing quantitative indicators for measuring the partnering performance of construction projects in Hong Kong', Construction Management and Economics, 26 (3), 277301.
Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C & Chan, D. W. M. 2012, 'Fuzzy set theory approach for measuring the performance of relationship-based construction projects in Australia', Journal of Management in Engineering, 28 (2), 181-192.
Share this article: