Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2019
ISSN 1836-3393 | Published by UTS ePRESS | http://ijcre.epress.lib.uts.edu.au
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Ensuring durability of community-university engagement in a challenging context: Empirical evidence on Science Shops
Citation: Vargiu, A., Cocco, M., Ghibellini, V. 2019. Ensuring durability of community-university engagement in a challenging context: Empirical evidence on Science Shops. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Article ID 6726. http:dx.doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v12i2.6726
© 2019 by the author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Supplementary file
Questionnaire survey of Science Shops

Graph 1 University and non-university-based Science Shops

Graph 2 Total projects per research area in 12 months
The small number of projects in hard sciences does not allow for identification of statistically significant differences among sectors. Nor does it allow for statistically robust inferences about the underlying reasons of the wide gap between hard sciences on one side and social sciences and humanities on the other.

Graph 3 Most affected stakeholders by Science Shop projects according to respondents

Graph 4 Ranking impact of Science Shops on students’ learning components

Graph 5 Total academic and non-academic participants in public meetings in 12 months

Graph 6 Total research outputs in 12 months

Graph 7 Origin of projects in 12 months

Graph 8 Relevant outcomes of Science Shops in 12 months

Graph 9 Relevant changes in 12 months
Data shown in Graph 9 was generated through a questionnaire item which asked respondents to answer ‘Yes’, ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ to the following sentence: ‘Please, consider the life of your science shop and say whether your knowledge activities have led to significant changes as to: [list of options as in Graph 9]’.