Reconceptualising Shared Services

Main Article Content

Peter McKinlay


Endeavours to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of local government have been a persistent theme both of politicians in higher tiers of government and of interest groups, especially business. The two contenders for improvement which receive most coverage both in the research literature and in popular discussion are amalgamation and shared services. Arguments from the literature have generally favoured shared services over amalgamation. Bish (2001) in a comprehensive review of North American research dismisses the argument for amalgamation as a product of flawed nineteenth-century thinking and a bureaucratic urge for centralized control. He does so making the very reasonable point that the presumed economies of scale which will result from amalgamation are a function not of the size and scale of individual local authorities, but of the services for which those local authorities are responsible, and the point at which economies of scale will be optimised will be very different for different services. The case against amalgamation is also reinforced by the absence of any significant post-facto evidence that amalgamation achieves either the promised savings or the anticipated efficiency gains (McKinlay 2006).

Article Details

How to Cite
McKinlay, P. (1). Reconceptualising Shared Services. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, (8-9).
Author Biography

Peter McKinlay, Local Government Centre, Auckland University of Technology

As well as his consulting work, Peter is the Director of the Local Government Centre at AUT University (LGC), New Zealand’s first university-based think tank dedicated to local government. The Centre has both a New Zealand and international focus and has established a number of linkages with leading think tanks internationally. Peter led the LGC’s work on different options for the future of metropolitan governance in Auckland. This included authorship of a number of major papers dealing with different aspects of local government which should be considered in addressing major restructuring.