New directions in New Zealand local government

Peter McKinlay

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to provide a ‘work in progress’ report on some initiatives emerging from local government practice in New Zealand which should help us consider how we think about the role of local government in a world which is undergoing dramatic change. The starting point is work which the writer undertook with the support of Local Government New Zealand (the national association) and a number of New Zealand councils considering the ‘proper role’ of local government. The context is an ongoing public debate driven substantially by the New Zealand business community from a perspective that this ‘proper role’ should be restricted to the delivery of local public goods, narrowly defined. This has included argument that local governments themselves should be structured substantially to promote the efficient delivery of services generally within the now well understood prescriptions of the ‘new public management’. One implication which the business sector in particular drew in looking at the workings of local government was that there should be economies of scale through further amalgamation of councils (the local government sector having been through a major amalgamation process in 1989 which eliminated a large number of special purpose authorities and reduced the number of territorial local authorities from more than 200 to 73). Debate continues, with the latest manifestation being the National Party led government's proposals for the restructuring of local government within the Auckland region, New Zealand's major metropolitan area. The initiatives discussed in this paper are partly a response, but more significantly a result of selected local authorities reflecting on the nature of their role, and the opportunities for being proactive in using their statutory privileges in ways that could produce benefits for their communities without any associated increase in the cost of local government itself.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Communities and Local Government 2008, Communities in control: Real people, Real power, White Paper, Communities and Local Government (UK). <http://www.communities.gov.uk/communities/communityempowerment/communitiesincontrol >.

Finn, J-G. 2008, Building Stronger Local Governments and Regions: An Action Plan for the Future of Local Governance in New Brunswick, Report of the Commissioner on the Future of Local Governance, Government of New Brunswick, Canada. <http://www.gnb.ca/cnb/promos/flg/mainreport-e.asp >.

Local Government Rates Inquiry Panel 2007, Funding Local Government, Report of the Local Government Rates Inquiry, Local Government Rates Inquiry. <http://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/wpg_URL/Agency-Independent-Inquiry-into-Local-Government-Rates-Rates-Inquiry-Reports?OpenDocument >.

Lowery, D. 2000, 'A Transactions Costs Model of Metropolitan Governance: Allocation Versus Redistribution in Urban America', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 49-79.

McKinlay Douglas limited 2006, Local Government Structure and Efficiency, Local Government New Zealand. <http://www.lgnz.co.nz/library/publications/download-docs.html >.

New Zealand Local Government Act 2002. <http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2002/0084/latest/DLM170873.html >.

Royal Commission on Auckland Governance, Submissions. <http://www.nzbr.org.nz/submissions.asp?DocType=Submission & offset=10 >.

Scutella, R., Wilkins, R. and Horn, M. 2009, Measuring Poverty and Social Exclusion in Australia: A Proposed Multidimensional Framework for Identifying Socio-Economic Disadvantage, Working paper 4/09, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research. <http://ideas.repec.org/p/iae/iaewps/wp2009n04.html >.



PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i5.1477

Share this article: