Fostering An Impactful Field of Learning Analytics

Main Article Content

Abstract

Over 2019 the breadth of articles published in the Journal of Learning Analytics reflects the diversity of contributions to the field, including quantitative, qualitative and design-based studies and contributions through the different submission types (Research, Practical, Data and Tools, and Book Review). This year we have also published two special sections. The first is a set of empirical papers related to the emerging area of Human-Centered Learning Analytics. In this section, five sets of authors each address the core challenge of how to design and implement learning analytics in ways that are people- rather than technology-centric to achieve impact in the field. The second is a new format for the journal, an invited dialogue around a critical community issue. In this section Neil Selwyn asks the intentionally provocative question “what’s the problem with learning analytics?”, which is engaged with by four respondents from the community, representing a variety of different perspectives. Both of these special sections tackle, in their own way, a central issue for the learning analytics community: how we ensure that the work we do has positive impact in the world.

Article Details

How to Cite
Knight, S., Wise, A., & Ochoa, X. (2019). Fostering An Impactful Field of Learning Analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.1
Section
Editorial

References

Kitto, K., Buckingham, S. S., & Gibson, A. (2018). Embracing imperfection in learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 451-460. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170413

Stuart, H. H., Levine, R. A., & Utts, J. (2019) Coup de Grâce for a Tough Old Bull: “Statistically Significant” Expires. The American Statistician, 73:sup1, 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1543616

Prager, E. M., Chambers, K. E., Plotkin, J. L., McArthur, D. L., Bandrowski, A. E., Bansal, N., Martone, M. E., Bergstrom, H. C., Bespalov, A. & Graf, C. (2019), Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing. Brain and Behavior, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1141

Tennant, J.P., Dugan, J.M., Graziotin, D. et al. (2017) A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research, 6:1151 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative inquiry, 16(10), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121

Wise, A. F., Knight, S., & Ochoa, X. (2018). When Are Learning Analytics Ready and What Are They Ready For. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(3), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.18608/JLA.2018.53.1E