Risk level of blockchain-related barriers in contract management within the Polish construction industry
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A significant research gap exists in understanding how blockchain-related barriers affect contract management in the Polish construction industry, particularly in terms of the risks that these barriers pose to implementation. The aim of this study was to identify the key barriers to blockchain adoption and to evaluate the risk level associated with each barrier. Using the failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) approach, a systematic review of the literature published between 2015 and 2024 was conducted to identify blockchain adoption barriers relevant to contract management. Purposive and snowball sampling targeted 45 qualified construction professionals in Warsaw, and a structured, expert-validated questionnaire was used to rate each barrier based on severity, occurrence, and detection. The FMEA enabled prioritization of blockchain-related risks according to their risk priority number (RPN), distinguishing low, moderate, and high-risk barriers. The findings reveal that the shortage of blockchain experts and the complexity of blockchain models pose the highest-risk barriers, while high implementation costs and limited client interest fall within the moderate-risk category. Recommended strategies include targeted capacity-building programs, simplification of blockchain system design, and collaborative funding. By clearly distinguishing between barriers (what obstructs adoption) and risks (the potential impact of those barriers), this study provides a structured, evidence-based foundation for improving blockchain adoption and strengthening digital transformation in Polish construction contract management.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.