A Systematic Review of Economic Sustainability of Vertical Greenery Systems for Buildings
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Urban areas have been greatly affected by climate change, leading to a rise in global temperatures. Vertical Greenery Systems (VGSs) are becoming increasingly important as a means of mitigating the effects of climate change. This research assessed the economic feasibility of VGSs to reduce the effects of climate change and enhance urban sustainability. Seventeen studies were evaluated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to determine the various costs, benefits, and economic indicators associated with VGS. Furthermore, the net present value, internal rate of return, and payback period were thoroughly evaluated to gain insight into their long-term economic sustainability. The results show that, even though the initial cost of VGS may be high, it can provide long-term financial advantages to building owners and operators through energy savings, increased property values, and decreased operational expenses. Nevertheless, the extended payback period and negative net present values for certain VGS types make them financially unsustainable. The purpose of this review is to help create evidence-based guidelines and suggestions for the successful implementation of sustainable VGS.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
References
Almeida, C., Teotónio, I., Silva, C. M. and Cruz, C. O. (2021). Socioeconomic feasibility of green roofs and walls in public buildings: The case study of primary schools in Portugal. Engineering Economist, 66 (1), pp.27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1748255.
Bakhshoodeh, R., Ocampo, C. and Oldham, C., 2022. Exploring the evapotranspirative cooling effect of a green façade. Sustainable Cities and Society, 81, p.103822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103822.
Cabeza, L. F., Bai, Q., Bertoldi, P., Kihila, J. M., Lucena, A. F. P., Mata, É., Mirasgedis, S., Novikova, A. and Saheb, Y., 2022. Buildings. In: Shukla, P. R., Skea, J., Slade, R., Al Khourdajie, A., van Diemen, R., McCollum, D., Pathak, M., Some, S., Vyas, P., Fradera, R., et al. eds., 2022. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009157926.011.
Delmastro, C. and Dubrow, R., 2023. Sustainable, Affordable Cooling Can Save Tens of Thousands of Lives Each Year. [Online]. Available at:
Ghazalli, A. J., Brack, C., Bai, X. and Said, I., 2019. Physical and Non-Physical Benefits of Vertical Greenery Systems: A Review. Journal of Urban Technology, 26 (4), pp.53–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1637694.
Haggag, M. and Hassan, A., 2015. Cost-benefit analysis of living wall systems on school building skins in a hot climate. In: Energy and Sustainability V: Special Contributions. WIT Press. pp.3–11. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2495/ess140011.
Haggag, M., Hassan, A. and Elmasry, S., 2014. Experimental study on reduced heat gain through green façades in a high heat load climate. Energy and Buildings, 82, pp.668–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.087.
Hollands, J. and Korjenic, A., 2021. Indirect economic effects of vertical indoor green in the context of reduced sick leave in offices. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13 (4), pp.1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042256.
Huang, Z., Lu, Y., Wong, N. H. and Poh, C. H., 2019. The true cost of “greening” a building: Life cycle cost analysis of vertical greenery systems (VGS) in tropical climate. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, pp.437–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.275.
Huang, Z., Tan, C. L., Lu, Y. and Wong, N. H., 2021. Holistic analysis and prediction of life cycle cost for vertical greenery systems in Singapore. Building and Environment, 196, p.107735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107735.
IEA, 2022. Buildings. Paris. [Online]. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/buildings [Accessed 2 November 2022].
IPCC, 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009157896.
Jim, C. Y. and Chen, W. Y., 2008. Assessing the ecosystem service of air pollutant removal by urban trees in Guangzhou (China). Journal of Environmental Management, 88 (4), Academic Press., pp.665–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.035.
Khor, N., Arimah, B., Otieno, R., van Oostrum, M., Mutinda, M., Martins, J. O., Arku, G., Broto, V. C., Chatwin, M., Dijkstra, L., et al., 2022. World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat).
Lucon, O., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Ahmed, A. Z., Akbari, H., Bertoldi, P., Cabeza, L. F., Eyre, N., Gadgil, A., Harvey, L. D. D., Jiang, Y., et al., 2014. Buildings. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., et al. eds., 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp.671–738.
Mannan, M. and Al-Ghamdi, S. G., 2022. Investigating environmental life cycle impacts of active living wall for improved indoor air quality. Building and Environment, 208, p.108595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108595.
Masi, F., Bresciani, R., Rizzo, A., Edathoot, A., Patwardhan, N., Panse, D. and Langergraber, G., 2016. Green walls for greywater treatment and recycling in dense urban areas: a case-study in Pune. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 6 (2), pp.342–347. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2016.019.
Matos Silva, C., Serro, J., Dinis Ferreira, P. and Teotónio, I., 2019. The socioeconomic feasibility of greening rail stations: a case study in lisbon. Engineering Economist, 64 (2), pp.167–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2018.1470272.
Melo, C., Teotónio, I., Silva, C. M. and Cruz, C. O., 2020. What’s the economic value of greening transport infrastructures? The case of the underground passages in Lisbon. Sustainable Cities and Society, 56, p.102083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102083.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. and Altman, D. G., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339 (7716), pp.332–336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.
Pan, L. and Chu, L. M., 2016. Energy saving potential and life cycle environmental impacts of a vertical greenery system in Hong Kong: A case study. Building and Environment, 96, pp.293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.033.
Pérez, G., Coma, J., Martorell, I. and Cabeza, L. F., 2014. Vertical Greenery Systems (VGS) for energy saving in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, pp.139–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.055.
Perini, K., Magrassi, F., Giachetta, A., Moreschi, L., Gallo, M. and Del Borghi, A., 2021. Environmental sustainability of building retrofit through vertical greening systems: A life-cycle approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13 (9), p.4886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094886.
Perini, K. and Rosasco, P., 2013. Cost–benefit analysis for green façades and living wall systems. Building and Environment, 70, pp.110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.012.
Perini, K. and Rosasco, P., 2016. Is greening the building envelope economically sustainable? An analysis to evaluate the advantages of economy of scope of vertical greening systems and green roofs. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 20, pp.328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.08.002.
Project Drawdown. (2020). The Drawdown Review: Climate Solutions for a New Decade. Wilkinson, K. ed., Project Drawdown Publications.
Qurraie, B. S. and Kıraç, B., 2023. Evaluation of energy efficiencies of double skin façade systems and double skin green façade systems in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 80 (3), pp.777–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2022.2115202.
Radić, M., Dodig, M. B. and Auer, T., 2019. Green facades and living walls-A review establishing the classification of construction types and mapping the benefits. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11 (17), p.4579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174579.
Riley, B., de Larrard, F., Malécot, V., Dubois-Brugger, I., Lequay, H. and Lecomte, G., 2019. Living concrete: Democratizing living walls. Science of the Total Environment, 673, pp.281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.065.
Rosasco, P. and Perini, K., 2018. Evaluating the economic sustainability of a vertical greening system: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of a pilot project in mediterranean area. Building and Environment, 142, pp.524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.017.
Santi, G., Bertolazzi, A., Croatto, G. and Turrini, U., 2019. Vertical turf for green façades: A vertical greenery modular system integrated to the building envelope. Journal of Green Building, 14 (4), pp.111–132. https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.14.4.111.
Seneviratne, S. I., Zhang, X., Adnan, M., Badi, W., Dereczynski, C., Di Luca, A., Ghosh, S., Iskandar, I., Kossin, J., Lewis, S., et al., 2021. Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate. In: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., et al. eds., 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp.1513–1766. doi:10.1017/9781009157896.013.
Shazmin, S. A. A., Sipan, I., Sapri, M., Ali, H. M. and Raji, F., 2017. Property tax assessment incentive for green building: Energy saving based-model. Energy, 122, pp.329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.078.
United Nations Environment Programme, 2021. 2021 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-emissions, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. [pdf]. Available at:
Veisten, K., Smyrnova, Y., Klæboe, R., Hornikx, M., Mosslemi, M. and Kang, J., 2012. Valuation of green walls and green roofs as soundscape measures: Including monetised amenity values together with noise-attenuation values in a cost-benefit analysis of a green wall affecting courtyards. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9 (11), 3770–3778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9113770.
Zhang, L., Deng, Z., Liang, L., Zhang, Y., Meng, Q., Wang, J. and Santamouris, M., 2019. Thermal behavior of a vertical green facade and its impact on the indoor and outdoor thermal environment. Energy and Buildings, 204, p.109502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109502.
Inflation rates by country. [Online]. Available at: https://www.worlddata.info/inflation.php [Accessed 8 April 2023].