Adopting Qualitative Data in Conceptual System Dynamic Modelling: A Focus on Road Infrastructure Projects in Nigeria
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Qualitative data plays an important role in system dynamics (SD) modelling, particularly in model conceptualization. Among the various forms of data, information from the mental database of stakeholders is considered the most important which can be accessed through stakeholder engagement using interviews. However, formal, and systematic process of interview and data analysis is required. Existing approaches used for systematically analysing qualitative data were based on grounded theory approach. In this study, we introduced a coding approach that is formulated based on the principles of thematic analysis, saliency analysis (an extension of thematic analysis) framework and case study approach, and key strengths of existing methods. This alternative or formulated approach is focused on (i) coding the data from all stakeholder groups, (ii) establishing causal relationships from causal attributions of stakeholders and transform the causal relationships into causal maps and (iii) establishing and maintain strong links between causal maps and data source using data source reference table and software. We then demonstrate an application of the coding approach in a study about cost performance of road infrastructure projects in Nigeria to analyse qualitative data collected from 16 semi-structured interviews.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
References
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods Oxford, Oxford : OUP.
Buetow, S. 2010. Thematic analysis and its reconceptualization as ‘Saliency Analysis’. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 15, 123-125.
Dicicco‐Bloom, B. & Crabtree, B. F. 2006. The qualitative research interview. Medical education, 40, 314-321.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
Eker, S. & Zimmermann, N. 2016. Using Textual Data in System Dynamics Model Conceptualization. Systems, 4, 28.
FMW&H 2019. List of on-going federal highway projects In: SECTOR, W. (ed.). Federal Ministry of Works and Housing, Nigeria: Federal Ministry of Works and Housing, Nigeria.
Forrester, J. W. 1992. Policies, decisions and information sources for modeling. European Journal of Operational Research, 59, 42-63.
Kim, H. & Andersen, D. F. 2012. Building confidence in causal maps generated from purposive text data: mapping transcripts of the Federal Reserve. System Dynamics Review, 28, 311-328.
Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. 2009. Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, Sage.
Luna‐Reyes, L. F. & Andersen, D. L. 2003. Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: methods and models. System Dynamics Review, 19, 271-296.
Mahmud, A. T., Ogunlana, S. O. & Hong, W. T. 2021. Key drivers of cost overrun in highway infrastructure projects in Nigeria: A context-based perspective. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(6), 1530-1555.
Mahmud, A. T., Ogunlana, S. O. & Hong, W. T. 2022. Understanding the Dynamics of Cost Overrun Triggers in Highway Infrastructure Projects in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 27(1), 29-56.
Nguyen, N., Beeton, R. & Halog, A. 2015. A systems thinking approach for enhancing adaptive capacity in small- and medium-sized enterprises: causal mapping of factors influencing environmental adaptation in Vietnam’s textile and garment industry. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35, 490-503.
Ogbu, C. P. & Adindu, C. C. 2019. Direct risk factors and cost performance of road projects in developing countries. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18 (2), 326-342.
Rabinovich, M. & Kacen, L. 2010. Advanced relationships between categories analysis as a qualitative research tool. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 698-708.
Repenning, N. P. & Sterman, J. D. 2002. Capability Traps and Self-Confirming Attribution Errors in the Dynamics of Process Improvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 265-295.
Sa'id, A. N. 2019. A Framework for Collaborative Costing in the UK Construction Industry. Doctor of Philosophy, Nottingham Trent University.
Sterman, J. D. 2000. Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world.
Turner, B., Tedeschi, L., Gates, R., Nicholas, T., Wuellner, M. & Dunn, B. Investigation into Land Use Changes and Consequences in the Northern Great Plains Using Systems Thinking and Dynamics. In: Eberlin, R. & Martinez-Moyano, I. J., eds. 31st International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 21-25 July, 2013 2013a Cambridge, MA, USA. System dynamics Society.
Turner, B. L., Kim, H. & Andersen, D. F. 2013b. Improving coding procedures for purposive text data: researchable questions for qualitative system dynamics modeling. System Dynamics Review, 29, 253-263.
Ullah, M. 2012. Enhancing the understanding of corruption through system dynamics modelling: a case study analysis of Pakistan. Doctor of Philosophy, University of Auckland.
Yearworth, M. & White, L. 2013. The uses of qualitative data in multimethodology: Developing causal loop diagrams during the coding process. European Journal of Operational Research, 231, 151-161.