Main Article Content
In the last years, the increase in urbanization and the volume of construction has accelerated. This situation requires systematizing the use of limited resources, especially in island territories. The construction sector contributes to the depletion of these resources and has a significant impact on society, which is why it is necessary to change its strategy and decision-making. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) may be the strategy to develop a socio-environmentally responsible production model that replaces the traditional model. A socially responsible construction company closes the cycles of construction materials, gives value to the waste generated, minimizes the impact that buildings have on the environment, makes responsible use of energy and water, uses innovations to improve the process and adequately manages its human resources. The aim of this work is to analyze the socially responsible behavior of companies in the construction sector in a limited and fragmented territory as is the province of Santa Cruz de Tenerife and to compare the importance that companies give to actions (environmental, social and economic) of CSR depending on whether they have been implemented or there are plans to implement them in the future. Quantitative and qualitative tools are used. The results indicate that aspects related to environmental sensitivity and social contribution contribute to a greater extent to the implementation of a CSR strategy, while economic aspects have a negative influence. In the case of companies that plan to implement a CSR strategy in the future, the aspect related to social contribution is the most influential.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
Abd Jamil, A.H., and Syazil Fathi, M., 2016. The integration of lean construction and sustainable construction: a stakeholder perspective in analyzing sustainable lean construction strategies in Malaysia. Procedia Computer Science, 100, pp.634-643.
Aguinis, H., and Glavas, A., 2012. What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), pp.932-968.
Balzarova, M., and Castka, P., 2018. Social responsibility: Experts’ viewpoints on adoption of the ISO 26000 standard. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, pp.819– 824.
Bonilla-Castro, E., and Rodríguez Sehk, P., 1997. Beyond the dilemma of methods. Bogotá: Grupo Editorial Norma.
Built, T., and Review, H.E., 2013. Barriers to Implementing Lean Construction in the UK. Construction Industry, 6, pp.1-17.
Burón-Maestro, D., 2012. Concrete and Sustainability in Regulations. In Sustainability: Energy Efficiency, Evaluation of Buildings and Structures. Spanish Institute of Cement and its applications Madrid: IECA.
Callejo, J., 2001. The discussion group: introduction to a research practice. Barcelona: Ariel Practicum.
Carroll, A., and Shabana, K., 2010. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Review, 12, pp.85-105.
Castka, P., and Corbett, C., 2016. Adoption and dissemination of environmental and social standards: The effect of rigor, governance and media coverage. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 36(11), pp.1504-1529.
Castka, P., Searcy, C., and Mohr, J., 2020. Technology-enhanced auditing: Improving veracity and timeliness in social and environmental audits of supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, p.120773.
Cherian, J., Umar, M., Ang Thu, P., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Safdar Sial, M. and Khuong, N.V., 2019. Does corporate social responsibility affect the financial performance of the manufacturing sector? Evidence from an emerging economy. Sustainability, 11(4), p.1182.
Croker, N., 2013. Corporate social responsibility and the Hong Kong construction industry. Doctoral Thesis. University of Newcastle (Australia).
Dahlsrud, A., 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 15(1), pp.1-13.
Darko, A., Chan, A.P., Huo, X., and Owusu-Manu, D.G., 2019. A scientometric analysis and visualization of global green building research. Building and Environment, 149, pp.501-511.
Darko, A., Zhang, C., and Chan, A., 2017. Drivers for green building: A review of empirical studies. Habitat International, 60, pp.34-49.
Domínguez-Herrera, M.M., 2017. Social responsibility of companies in the building sector. Analysis of sustainability in the case of construction companies in the province of Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Doctoral Thesis University of La Laguna (Spain).
Domínguez-Herrera, M.M, González-Morales, O., and González-Díaz, E., 2018. Corporate Social Responsibility of the Construction Sector in Spain. In: Charles Richard Baker, ed., Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Practices, Issues and Global Perspectives, Nova Science Publishers, pp. 215-268.
European Commission, 2001. GREEN PAPER: Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission, 2011. A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission, 2012. Strategy for the sustainable competitiveness of the construction sector and its enterprises. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission, 2020a. A Renovation Wave for Europe - greening our buildings, creating jobs, improving lives. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission, 2020b. A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
Gowri, A., 2004. When responsibility can’t do it. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(1), pp.33-50.
Graci, S., and Doods, R., 2010. Sustainable tourism in island destinations. London: Earthscan.
Hamui Sutton, A., 2016. The research question in qualitative studies. Investigación en Educación Médica, 5(17), pp.49–54.
IHOBE, 2010. Green Building Rating Systems: How to evaluate sustainability in buildings? País Vasco: IHOBE: Elhuyar.
Lim, B.T., and Loosemore, M., 2017. How socially responsible is construction business in Australia and New Zealand? Procedia Engineering, 180, pp.531-540.
Loosemore, M., and Lim, B., 2017. Linking corporate social responsibility and organizational performance in the construction industry. Construction Management Economics, 35(3), pp.95-105.
Loosemore, M., Lim, B.T.H., Ling, F.Y.Y., and Zeng, H.Y., 2018. A comparison of corporate social responsibility practices in the Singapore, Australia and New Zealand construction industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, pp.149-159.
Ministerio de Presidencia, 2008. Royal Decree 1247/2008, of July 18, which approves the Structural Concrete Instruction (EHE-08). Official State Gazette, 203, pp.35176-35178.
Miquel, S., Bigné, E., Cuenca, A.C., Miquel, M.J., and Lévy, J.P., 1996. Market Research. Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Official Journal of the European Union, 2013. Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, 26 June 2013, on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC. 29.6.2013, L 182. Brussels: European Commission.
Palmero, C., Escolar, C., Luis, I., De la Torre, T., Gañán, A., Baños, V., Corbí, M., and Jiménez, A., 2014. Impacto de la educación en el emprendimiento. making-of de un análisis por grupos de discusión. Revista INFAD de Psicología. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 7(1), pp.507-518.
Prado-Roman, C., Del Castillo-Peces, C., Mercado-Idoeta, C., and Del Castillo-Peces, J., 2018. The effects of implementing ISO 9001 in the Spanish construction industry. Cuadernos de Gestión, 18(1), pp.149-171.
Requena i Mora, M. (Coord.), 2016. A group on the discussion group. Between instrumental logic and the eternal return to critical sociology. Encrucijadas-Critical Journal of Social Sciences, 12, pp.1-85.
Rezaei, F., Bulle, C., and Lesage, P., 2019. Integrating building information modeling and life cycle assessment in the early and detailed building design stages. Building and Environment, 153, pp.158-167.
Rodríguez Gómez, G., Gil Flores, J., and García Jiménez, E., 1996. Qualitative Research Methodology. Granada (Spain): Aljibe Editions.
Ruiz Olabuénaga, J.I., 2012. Qualitative Research Methodology, 15. Bilbao (España): University of Deusto.
Sánchez-Hernández, J.F., 2019. Contribution of the structure to sustainability. Eduardo Torroja Institute of Construction Sciences (IETcc-CSIC). Torroja TV Institute. Available through: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyTmaVc3rXsandfbclid=IwAR0MYYwMh8kPVdfvYHQrTB9iOjD4sYUgj-rIRCIt_P2joaydxn_D8ScwcTA [Accessed 12 December 2021].
Schneider, A., 2020. Bound to fail? exploring the systemic pathologies of CSR and their implications for CSR research. Business and Society, 59(7), pp.1303-1338.
Spanish Association for Standardization and Certification, 2012. Social responsibility guide. UNE-ISO 26000: 2012. Madrid: AENOR.
United Nations, 2009. Common Carbon Metric for Measuring Energy Use and Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Building Operations. Available through: https://c2e2.unepdtu.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/09/unep-sbci-common-carbon-metric.pdf [Accessed 16 April 2022].
United Nations, 2012. The future we want. Outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20–22 June. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/733FutureWeWant.pdf [Accessed 16 April 2022].
Vallina, D., 2020. III Study on CSR in the cement sector. Cemento Hormigón, (177), p.9.
Watts, G., Dainty, A., and Fernie, S., 2015. Making sense of CSR in construction: do contractor and client perceptions align? In: Raiden, A., Aboagye-Nimo, E. (Eds.), Proceedings 31st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7e9 September 2015. UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Lincoln, pp.197-206.
Xia, B., Olanipekun, A., Chen, Q., Xie, L., and Liu, Y., 2018. Conceptualising the state of the art of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry and its nexus to sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, pp.340-353.
Zeng, T., 2016. Corporate Social Responsibility, tax aggressiveness, and firm market value. Accounting Perspectives, 15(1), pp.7-30.
Zhang, Q., Oo, B.L., and Lim, B.T.H., 2019. Drivers, motivations, and barriers to the implementation of corporate social responsibility practices by construction enterprises: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, pp.563-584.