Sustainable Innovation for Queensland's Housing Design: a Case Study

Main Article Content

Michael Johnston
Mirko Guaralda
Sukanlaya Sawang


This research provides an assessment tool that assists the selection process of sustainability in detached suburban housing. It investigates the implications of using different design and construction methods including architecturally designed houses, developer housing and prefabricated houses. The study simulates one example of the three types of houses that have been chosen to fulfil a real client brief on a real site on the Sunshine Coast, Queensland Australia. Criteria for sustainability assessment are formulated based on literature reviews, exemplar designs and similar research projects for which the houses can be adequately evaluated. This criterion covers aspects including energy use, materials and thermal performance. The data is collected using computer models and sustainability assessment software to compare and draw conclusions on the success of each house.

Our study indicates that architecturally designed housing with prefabricated building techniques are a better alternative to generic developer style housing. Our research provides an insight into the implications of three key elements of sustainability including energy use, materials and thermal performance. Designers, builders, developers and home-buyers are given an insight into some options currently available on the housing market and how the choices made during early design stages can provide a more positive environmental impact.  

Article Details

How to Cite
Johnston, M., Guaralda, M., & Sawang, S. (2014). Sustainable Innovation for Queensland’s Housing Design: a Case Study. Construction Economics and Building, 14(4), 11-31.
Articles (Peer reviewed)


ARIF, M. & SYAL, M. 2013. Addressing Global Changes for a Sustainable Built Environment: Implementing Sustainable Construction. Construction Innovation, 13, null.

BIRKELAND, J. 2002. Design for sustainability: a sourcebook of integrated, eco-logical solutions, London, Earthscan.

BLISMAS, N. & WAKEFIELD, R. 2009. Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 9, 72-83.

DAVIES, C. 2005. The prefabricated home, London, Reaktion.

DISCOE, P., QUINN, A. & BANISH, R. 2008. Zen Architecture: The Building Process as Practice, Gibbs Smith Publishers.

JOHNSON, L. 2014. Accommodating Australians. Commonwealth Government Involvement in Housing: Designer Suburbs. Architects and Affordable Homes in Australia. Journal of Australian Studies, 38, 120-123.

KAUFMANN, M. & REMICK., C. 2009. Prefab green, Layton, UT, Gibbs Smith.

KENDALL, S. 1999. Open building: an approach to sustainable architecture. Journal of Urban Technology, 6, 1-16.

KIBERT, C. J. 2012. Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery, Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

KOENIG, G., EAMES, C. & EAMES, R. 2005. Charles & Ray Eames, 1907-1978, 1912-1988: Pioneers of Mid-century Modernism, Cologne, Germany, Taschen.

LINNER, T. & BOCK, T. 2012. Evolution of large‐scale industrialisation and service innovation in Japanese prefabrication industry. Construction Innovation, 12, 156-178.

MCHARG, I. L. 1981. Human ecological planning at Pennsylvania. Landscape Planning, 8, 109-120.
Author. 2010. Brisbane's suburbs of growth and decline. Brisbane Times, p.1.

NEWMAN, P. & KENWORTHY, J. 1999. Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence, Washington, DC, Island Press.

OLUWOLE AKADIRI, P. & OLANIRAN FADIYA, O. 2013. Empirical analysis of the determinants of environmentally sustainable practices in the UK construction industry. Construction Innovation, 13, 352-373.

ÖST, C. E. 2012. Housing and children: simultaneous decisions?—a cohort study of young adults’ housing and family formation decision. Journal of Population Economics, 25, 349-366.

ROY, R., BROWN, J. & GAZE, C. 2003. Re-engineering the construction process in the speculative house-building sector. Construction Management & Economics, 21, 137-146.

SCHNEIDER, T. & TILL, J. 2005. Flexible housing: opportunities and limits. Architectural Research Quarterly, 9, 157-166.

SMITH, E. A. T. 2007. Case Study Houses, Cologne, Germany, Taschen.

SNYDER, V. 2005. Refabricating Architecture: How Manufacturing Methodologies are Poised to Transform Building Construction. Journal of Architectural Education, 59, 51-52.

STAIB, G., DÖRRHÖFER, A. & ROSENTHAL, M. 2008. Components and Systems: Modular Construction–Design, Structure, New Technologies, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.

VAN DER RYN, S. & COWAN, S. 2007. Ecological design, London, Island Press.

WINSTANLEY, A., THORNS, D. C. & PERKINS, H. C. 2002. Moving house, creating home: Exploring residential mobility. Housing Studies, 17, 813-832.

WOOD, R. 2009. Structural decomposition analysis of Australia's greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy, 37, 4943-4948.

ZHANG, S., PAN, Y., LI, N. & SUN, Q. Year. A Comparative Study of the Direct Costs Between Prefabricated Housing System and the Traditional Construction Technology—A Case Study of Precast Concrete Wall Panel. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, 2014. Springer, 349-358.