Revamping occupational safety and health training: Integrating andragogical principles for the adult learner
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Despite attempts to improve safety performance, the construction industry continues to account for a disproportionate rate of injuries. A large proportion of these injuries occur because workers are unable to recognize and respond to hazards in dynamic and unpredictable environments. Unrecognized hazards expose workers to unanticipated risks and can lead to catastrophic accidents. In order to enhance hazard recognition skills, employers often put new and experienced workers through formal hazard recognition training programs. Unfortunately, current training programs primarily rely on instructor-centric pedagogical approaches, which are insensitive to the adult learning process. In order to ensure effective adult learning, training programs must integrate learner-centric andragogical principles to improve engagement and retention in adult trainees. This paper aims to discuss training program elements that can potentially accelerate the adult learning process while improving safety knowledge retention. To this end, the researchers reviewed relevant literature on the cognitive processes of adult learning, essential components of effectual training programs and developed a reliable framework for the training and transfer of safety knowledge. A case example of successfully using the framework is also presented. The results of the study will provide safety trainers and construction professionals with valuable information on developing effective hazard recognition and receptor training programs, with the goal of improving construction safety performance.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
References
Cameron, I., Hare, B. & Davies, R. 2008, ‘Fatal and major construction accidents: a comparison between Scotland and the rest of Great Britain’, Safety Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 692-708.
Carter, G. & Smith, S.D. 2006, ‘Safety hazard identification on construction projects’, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 197-205.
Findley, M., Smith, S., Kress, T., Petty, G. & Enoch, K. 2004, ‘Safety program elements in construction’, Professional safety, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 14-21.
Fleming, M. A. 2009, ‘Hazard recognition.’ By Design,ASSE,11-15.
Forrest, S.P. & Peterson, T. 2006, ‘It's Called Andragogy.’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 113-122.
Haslam, R., Hide, S., Gibb, A.G., Gyi, D.E., Pavitt, T., Atkinson, S. & Duff, A. 2005, ‘Contributing factors in construction accidents’, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 401-415.
Hinze, J., Thurman, S. & Wehle, A. 2013, ‘Leading indicators of construction safety performance’, Safety Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 23-28.
Holte, K.A. & Kjestveit, K. 2012, ‘Young workers in the construction industry and initial OSH-training when entering work life’, Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, vol. 41, pp. 4137-4141.
Holton, E.F., Swanson, R.A. & Naquin, S.S. 2001, ‘Andragogy in practice: Clarifying the andragogical model of adult learning’, Performance Improvement Quarterly, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 118-143.
Huang, X. & Hinze, J. 2006, ‘Owner’s role in construction safety’, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 164-173.
Kirkpatrick, D.L. 1998, Evaluating training programs : the four levels, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, Calif.
Knowles, M.S., Holton, E.F. & Swanson, R.A. 2011, The adult learner : the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam [etc.].
Larson, J. 2006, ‘Intersection of Andragogy and Distance Education: Handing over the Reins of Learning to Better Prepare Students for the Practice of Law, The’, TM Cooley J.Prac.& Clinical L., vol. 9, pp. 117.
Lindeman, E.C., Gessner, R. & Otto, M. 1956, The democratic man : Selected writings fo Eduard C. Lindeman, , Boston.
Misch, D.A. 2002, ‘Andragogy and medical education: Are medical students internally motivated to learn?’, Advances in Health Sciences Education, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 153-160.
Mitropoulos, P., Abdelhamid, T.S. & Howell, G.A. 2005, ‘Systems model of construction accident causation’, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 131, no. 7, pp. 816-825.
Pinto, A., Nunes, I.L. & Ribeiro, R.A. 2011, ‘Occupational risk assessment in construction industry–Overview and reflection’, Safety Science, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 616-624.
Rogers, C.R. 1995, On becoming a person : a therapist's view of psychotherapy, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston; New York.
Roudsari, B.S. & Ghodsi, M. 2005, ‘Occupational injuries in Tehran’, Injury, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 33-39.
Safe Work Australia, (2009). Work-related injuries in Australia, 2005-06, available at http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA
Taylor, B. & Kroth, M. 2009, ‘Andragogy's Transition into the Future: Meta-Analysis of Andragogy and Its Search for a Measurable Instrument.’, Journal of Adult Education, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1-11.
Wang, Y., Goodrum, P.M., Haas, C., Glover, R. & Vazari, S. 2010, ‘Analysis of the benefits and costs of construction craft training in the United States based on expert perceptions and industry data’, Construction Management and Economics, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1269-1285.
Wilkins, J.R. 2011, ‘Construction workers’ perceptions of health and safety training programmes’, Construction Management and Economics, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1017-1026.