Modern Methods of Construction requires Modern Social Value thinking
Main Article Content
Abstract
Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) are increasingly promoted as a solution to long-standing construction industry productivity and efficiency challenges through industrialised, off-site and centralised production processes. At the same time Social Value (SV) practices are being increasingly adopted by contractors to address both the perceived anti-social nature of the industry and increase procurement success. Both concepts have grown in importance within the construction industry. However, whilst SV policies focus on hyper-local socioeconomic community benefits. The problem exists that rather than align, at present the local nature of SV and centralised focus of MMC compete, contradict, and in some cases, serve to undermine one another. The contradicting natures of these concepts creates a tension that is yet to be explored. This research addresses this gap in knowledge to understand how this tension can be resolved for the benefit of both concepts. Interviews with 20 industry practitioners are undertaken utilising the theoretical lens of legitimacy theory to understand practitioner action. The findings reveal both SV and MMC serve as reciprocal barriers to one another’s development. Yet the research indicates that both concepts could compliment and support one another if a Modern Social Value (MSV) approach is adopted. This is an innovative centralised approach to SV creation and moves away from the current devolved system of SV delivery. This research provides a substantial original contribution to an increasingly significant international problem in the reconciliation of two seemingly disparate yet intertwined concepts.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
How to Cite
References
Auerswald, P. E. (2009). Creating social value. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1376425
Barthorpe, S. (2010). Implementing corporate social responsibility in the UK construction industry. Property Management, 28(1), p.4–17
Belal, Ataur and Owen, David L. (2015). The rise and fall of stand-alone social reporting in a multinational subsidiary in Bangladesha case study. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28 (7), pp. 1160-1192.
Bendi, D., Rana, M. Q., Arif, M., Goulding, J. S., & Sawhney, A. (2020). An Off-Site Construction Readiness Maturity Model for the Indian Construction Sector. Construction Innovation, 21(1), 123 - 142Christensen et al.,2021
Clarke, T., Foster, L., Sloan, L, and Bryman, A (2021). Social Research Methods. 6th Ed. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
de la Cruz Jara, M. F., Spanjol, J., & Doppstadt, T. (2025). Strategic social value orientation and sustainability performance: A commensuration perspective. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406241242900 https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406241242900
de Savary, S. (2018). The UK has a long way to go to become a leader in modular construction. [online] Property Week. Available at: https://www.propertyweek.com/comment/the-uk-has-a-long-way-to-go-to-become-a-leader-in-modular-construction-/5096416.article
Dobson, J. (2020). Maximising social value from infrastructure projects (Version 1.1). Useful Projects. https://usefulprojects.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Maximising_social_value_from_infrastructure_projects_v1.1.pdf
Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370
Dowsett, R.M., Green, M.S., Harty, C.F., 2022. Speculation beyond technology: building scenarios through storytelling. Build. Cities. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.213.
Duff, A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility as a legitimacy maintenance strategy in the professional accountancy firm. The British Accounting Review. 49(6), p.1-19
Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business as usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575176
Ebiega-Oselebe, O, Watts, G, and Higham, A. (2021). Construction Project Success as a Wicked Problem: The role of the local community in Ebonyi, Nigeria. Construction and Human Settlements Management Journal. 1(2) p49-66
Egan, J (1998). Rethinking Construction. Constructing Excellence. Available at: https://constructingexcellence.org.uk/rethinking-construction-the-egan-report/
El Daouk, M. (2025). Rethinking social value in projects: An objectivist framework for creating social outcomes through the social trifecta. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-12-2024-0326
Farmer, M. (2016). The Farmer Review of the UK Construction Labour Model: Modernise or Die. Retrieved from London, UK: http://www.cast-consultancy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Farmer-Review-1.pdf
Gao, Y., & Tian, X.-L. (2020). Prefabrication policies and the performance of construction industry in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 120042.
GCB (2020) Zero Avoidable Waste in Construction: What do we mean by it and how best to interpret it. Technical Author: Katherine Adams. Editors: Robert Pearce and Jane Thornback of the Construction Products Association.
Gidigah, B. K., Agyekum, K., & Baiden, B. K. (2022). Defining social value in the public procurement process for works. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(6), 2245–2267. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2020-0848
Galvin, R. 2015. How many interviews are enough? Do qualitative interviews in building energy consumption research produce reliable knowledge? Journal of Building Engineering 1. p.2–12
Goulding, J. S., & Rahimian, F. P. (2019). Offsite Manufacturing: Envisioning the Future Agenda. In J. S. Goulding & F. P. Rahimian (Eds.), Offsite Production and Manufacturing for Innovative Construction: People, Process and Technology. Oxon, UK and New Youk, USA: Routledge.
Griffin, A, and May, V. (2012). Narrative analysis and interpretative phenomenological analysis. In, Seale, C, Researching Society and Culture. 3rd Ed. Sage Publications. London.
Guribie, F., Agumba, A, and Muthelo, R (2025). Global research activities, trend and future research of OSH technologies in the construction industry. Safety Science. 191. 106979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106979
Gutiérrez Nieto, B., Camón Cala, J., Cuéllar Fernández, B., & Fuertes Callén, Y. (2025). A bibliometric analysis of the social return on investment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05529-w
Gyadu Asiedu, N. A. A., Aigbavboa, C., & Ametepey, S. O. (2024). Social value trends in construction research: A bibliometric review of the past decade. Sustainability, 16(12), 4983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124983.
Kochkina, E., Macchia, M., & Floris, M. (2024). Strategic language use in sustainability reporting: An empirical study. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310229
Kroeger, A., & Weber, C. (2014). Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0344
Latham, M (1994) Constructing the Team. Constructing Excellence. Available at: https://constructingexcellence.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Constructing-the-team-The-Latham-Report.pdf
Le, T., & Lemke, F. (2025). Shaping the future of business sustainability: LDA topic modeling insights, definitions, and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-05969-z
Loosemore and Lim, 2017
Loosemore, M., Higgon, D., & Osborne, J. (2020). Managing new social procurement imperatives in the Australian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(10), 3075–3093. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2019-0643
Lui, X., Hang, Y., Wang, Q., Chiu, C and Zhou, D (2022). The role of energy consumption in global carbon intensity change: A meta-frontier-based production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Energy Economics. 109, 105968. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105968
MakeUK (2022). Greener, Better, Faster: Modular’s role in solving the housing crisis. Available at: https://www.makeuk.org/insights/reports/greener-better-faster-modulars-role-in-solving-the-housing-crisis
Malacina, I., Karttunen, E., Jääskeläinen, A., Lintukangas, K., Heikkilä, J., & Kähkönen, A.-K. (2022). Capturing the value creation in public procurement: A practice based view. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 28(2), Article 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100745
Mangvwat, J. S., Spillane, J. P., & Bradley, J. G. (2026). Integrating social value into public procurement: A strategic framework for sustainable construction in Nigerian tertiary institutions. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-07-2025-0166
Nguyen, D. T., & Le, P. L. (2022). Twenty-year application of logistics and supply chain management in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 40(10), 796–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2110273
ONS, (2024) Construction statistics, Great Britain: 2024. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/constructionindustry/articles/constructionstatistics/2024
Phellas, C., Bloch, C, and, Seale, C. (2012). Structured methods: interviews, questionnaires and observation. In, Seale, C, Researching Society and Culture. 3rd Ed. Sage Publications. London.
Raiden, A., Loosemore, M., King, A., & Gorse, C. (2019). Social value in construction (1st ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Social-Value-in-Construction/Raiden-Loosemore-King-Gorse/p/book/9781138295100
Razkenari, M., Fenner, A., Shojaei, A., Hakim, H., & Kibert, C. (2020). Perceptions of offsite construction in the United States: An investigation of current practices. Journal of Building Engineering, 29, 101138.
Ricket, A. L., & Goodspeed, T. (2025). Impact measurement for social enterprises: Social return on investment and subjective well-being valuation in the United States. Journal of the International Council for Small Business. https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2025.2532775
Robson, C, and, McCartan, K. (2017). Real World Research. 4th Edition. John Wiley and Sons. London
Samuel, F., & Hatleskog, E. (Eds.). (2020). Social value in architecture [Special issue]. Architectural Design, 90(4), 1–136. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.mmu.idm.oclc.org/toc/15542769/2020/90/4
Samuel, F., & Watson, K. (2023). Social value of the built environment. Buildings and Cities, 4(1), 938–947. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.399
Sandelowski, M. (1991). Telling stories: Narrative Approaches in Qualitative Research. The Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 23(3), p161-166.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1909). On the concept of social value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 23(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882798
Skidmore, R (2021) Measuring Social Value: Can We Agree on a Metric? Available from: https://www.thedeveloper.live/places/places/measuring-social-value-can-we-agreeon-a-metric
Solin, I., Gutierrez Bucheli, L and Maxwell, D (2025). A global review of Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) workforce training. In R.H. Crawford, A. Stephan, C. Candido, J. Helal and P. Gobinath (eds.), Proceedings of the 58ᵗʰ International Conference of the Architectural Science Association 2025, pp. 28-37. ©2025, The Architectural Science Association and The University of Melbourne, Australia. https://doi.org/10.65388/TMIF5530
Stevens, M and Noguchi, M (2019). The Challenges of Mass Customization for Designing and Constructing Residential Spaces. CIB World Building Congress 2019 Hong Kong SAR, China 17 – 21 June 2019
Suchman, M (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-611
Thomas, T. E., & Lamm, E. (2012). Legitimacy and organizational sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1421-4
UK Green Building Council. (2018). Social value in new development: An introductory guide for local authorities and development teams
Vanclay, F., Esteves, A. M., Aucamp, I., & Franks, D. M. (2015). Social impact assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. International Association for Impact Assessment. Social-Impact-Assessment-Guidance-for-Assessing-and-Managing-the-Social-Impacts-of-Projects.pdf
Waqar, A., Al Hajj, F., Danish, M., Khan, M and Houda, M (2025). Evaluating the influence of modern construction methods on sustainable construction success. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption. 19. 100327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100327
Watts, G. and Higham, A (2022) How the Social Value Act (2012) Contributes to Wealth Inequality in the UK Construction Industry. Climate Emergency – Managing, Building, and Delivering the Sustainable Development Goals pp 23-32
Watts, G., Fernie, S. and Dainty, A. (2019), "Paradox and legitimacy in construction: how CSR reports restrict CSR practice", International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 231-246.
Watts, G (2025). A Model of Social Value Maturity for Benchmarking Construction Contractors. In Neilson, C (Ed) Procs 41st Annual ARCOM conference, 1-3 September 2025, Dundee, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Watts, G (2024). Authenticity and Negativism: Social Value in UK Construction. In: Tutesigensi, A (Ed) Procs 40th Annual ARCOM conference, 2-4 September 2024, London, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Wilson, W (2021). Stimulating housing supply – Government initiatives (England). House of Commons Library. Available at: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn06416/#:~:text=300%2C000%20homes%20a%20year%20by,areas%20that%20really%20need%20them.
Weinfass, I (2025). Modular firm went under after client withheld £585,000. Available at: https://www.constructionnews.co.uk/financial/administrations/modular-firm-went-under-after-client-withheld-585000-07-11-2025/
Wright, T., Conley, H., Mamode, J. C., & Sarter, E. K. (2025). From social justice to social value: The changing fortunes of using public purchasing for social ends. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767251330451