When the Judiciary is defamed: Restraint Policy under Challenge

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gould Kim en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-08-20T13:01:35Z
dc.date.available 2009-08-20T13:01:35Z
dc.date.issued 2006 en_US
dc.identifier 2006005199 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Gould Kim 2006, 'When the Judiciary is defamed: Restraint Policy under Challenge', Thomson Law Book Co., vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 602-622. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0004-9611 en_US
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/974
dc.description.abstract There is a "policy" that judicial officers should not sue for defamation, save in exceptional circumstances. But this is coming under challenge on a number of fronts. Concerns about maintaining public confidence in the judiciary if this policy is relaxed or even abandoned are now largely illusory in the face of a robust judiciary as part of a modern democracy. More worrying is the potential chilling effect on criticism of the judiciary; the real issue is whether the defamation defences are up to the task of adequately protecting this form of speech - and it appears that there may be reason for concern. These issues are considered against the background of the robust views about criticism of the judiciary expressed by Justice Sackville, Chair of the Judicial Conference of Australia and a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia, in his Lucinda Lecture and other fora in 2005. The inquiry also provides insight into other wider issues including the interrelationship between the judicial restraint policy and scandalising contempt. en_US
dc.publisher Thomson Law Book Co en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon 0 en_US
dc.title When the Judiciary is defamed: Restraint Policy under Challenge en_US
dc.parent The Australian Law Journal en_US
dc.journal.volume 80 en_US
dc.journal.number 9 en_US
dc.publocation Sydney, Australia en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 602 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 622 en_US
dc.cauo.name Law en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record