The Anisminic doctrine of extended jurisdictional error in New South Wales superior courts

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ellis-Jones, Ian en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-05-14T07:47:59Z
dc.date.available 2010-05-14T07:47:59Z
dc.date.created 2010-05-14T07:47:59Z en_US
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.date.issued 2007 en_US
dc.identifier 2006010532 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Ellis-Jones Ian 2007, 'The Anisminic doctrine of extended jurisdictional error in New South Wales superior courts', Thomson Lawbook Co, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 164-182. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1324-1265 en_US
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/6533
dc.description.abstract In Australia, despite some intermittent enthusiasm for the Anisminic doctrine of extended jurisdictional error, most Australian superior courts continue to maintain, or at least pay lip-service to, a distinction between jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional errors of law. This has been particularly the case in New South Wales where, even since the landmark High Court of Australia case of Craig v South Australia, the State's two superior courts, the Supreme Court (together with the Court of Appeal) and the Land and Environment Court, respectively, generally decide matters before them involving jurisdictional error using the traditional doctrine of jurisdictional error, notwithstanding that Craig is increasingly, and at times incogruously, cited as authority for their conclusions. en_US
dc.publisher Thomson Lawbook Co en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon en_US
dc.title The Anisminic doctrine of extended jurisdictional error in New South Wales superior courts en_US
dc.parent Local Government Law Journal en_US
dc.journal.volume 12 en_US
dc.journal.number 3 en_US
dc.publocation Sydney, Australia en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 164 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 182 en_US
dc.cauo.name LAW.Faculty of law en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.for 180100 en_US
dc.personcode 940356 en_US
dc.percentage 100 en_US
dc.classification.name Law en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.description.keywords administrative law, jurisdictional error, extended jurisdictional error en_US
dc.staffid 940356 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record