Abstract:
This paper reviews New Zealand's experience of lockouts over the last near-two
decades. It employs published and unpublished official (Statistics New Zealand)
data plus unofficial data on the following, hitherto ignored, dimensions of lockouts:
(i) employees involved in lockouts, (ii) person-days lost due to lockouts and (iii)
the average duration of lockouts. The patterns of lockouts are compared for
different New Zealand politico-legislative eras from 1986 to 2004. It is found that
there has been, over time, a declining trend in the incidence of person-days lost
due both to strikes and to lockouts in New Zealand. But the relative incidence of
person-days lost due to lockouts vis a vis strikes rose quite sharply during the
'middle' years of the operation of the union-hostife Employment Contracts Act,
1991. Comparisons are made with Australian experience. There are some notable
similarities in the pattern of lockouts in both countries, including the tendency
for the average duration of lockouts to be considerably longer than the average the duration of strikes.
