Performance of Flocculation and Adsorption Pretreatments to Ultrafiltration of Biologically Treated Sewage Effluent the Effect of Seasonal Variations

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shon Ho Kyong en_US
dc.contributor.author Vigneswaran Saravanamuth en_US
dc.contributor.author Ngo Huu Hao en_US
dc.contributor.author Johnston Archie en_US
dc.contributor.author Kim In en_US
dc.contributor.author Cho J en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-06-26T04:10:54Z
dc.date.available 2009-06-26T04:10:54Z
dc.date.issued 2006 en_US
dc.identifier 2006005576 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Shon Ho Kyong et al. 2006, 'Performance of Flocculation and Adsorption Pretreatments to Ultrafiltration of Biologically Treated Sewage Effluent: the Effect of Seasonal Variations', Taylor and Francis Group, vol. 41, no. 16, pp. 3585-3596. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0149-6395 en_US
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/617
dc.description.abstract The effect of seasonal variations on ultrafiltration (UF) following pretreatment was investigated in terms of organic removal, removal of fraction, and molecular weight (MW) distribution. The MW range of effluent organic matter (EfOM) in biologically treated sewage effluent during winter (BTSE- W) consisted of large MW. However, the MW ranged from 3000 to 200 daltons in biologically treated sewage effluent in the summer (BTSE-S). During filtration experiments of BTSE-S, the UF NTR 7410 filter showed rapid flux decline with time without pretreatment. FeCI) flocculation removed the hydrophobic (HP) and hydrophilic (HL) fractions with different trends. In winter the HP fraction was removed up to 68.5%, whereas during the summer season, the HL fraction was removed by up to 59.8%. Flocculation removed large MW organics together with small MW, while PAC removed the majority of small MW organics. The flux decline with adsorption was also more severe than that with flocculation. Considering MW distribution, when large MW was removed by flocculation, the flux decline was minimized, whereas PAC adsorption which removed small MW still decreased the permeate flux. en_US
dc.publisher Taylor &Francis en_US
dc.relation.hasversion Accepted manuscript version en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01496390600997864 en_US
dc.rights This is an electronic version of an article published in Shon Ho Kyong et al. 2006, 'Performance of Flocculation and Adsorption Pretreatments to Ultrafiltration of Biologically Treated Sewage Effluent: the Effect of Seasonal Variations'. Separation Science and Technology Volume 41, Issue 16, 2006 pages 3585-3596. Separation Science and Technology is available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01496390600997864 en_US
dc.title Performance of Flocculation and Adsorption Pretreatments to Ultrafiltration of Biologically Treated Sewage Effluent the Effect of Seasonal Variations en_US
dc.parent Separation Science and Technology en_US
dc.journal.volume 41 en_US
dc.journal.number 16 en_US
dc.publocation Philadelphia USA en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 3585 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 3596 en_US
dc.cauo.name DVCRch.Institute for Water and Environmental Resource Mgmnt en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record