| dc.description.abstract |
In this paper we investigate a uniquely complex organizational
context—that of the fast-tracked large-scale project management
of a significant piece of Sydney 2000 Olympic infrastructure,
which we researched in terms of its management through
the “future perfect.” In a grounded analysis we resolved to
track how the future perfect developed in the life of one large,
complex project whose uniqueness meant that it was unable
to be strategically planned in advance. We tracked the use
of what we term “future perfect strategy” through analysis
of data collected both in leadership meetings of the directing
agency, “PALT”—Project Alliance Leadership Team—as well
as in individual interviews that we conducted in and around
the project, and through analysis of media coverage. Overall,
the project was a success, but some problems arose along the
way to completion. Largely, these were focused on issues of
social rather than technical construction—something even the
most strategic of plans cannot account for. As well as identifying
some of the specific mechanisms for encouraging future
perfect strategy that were used in the project, including encouraging
“strange conversations,” “playing end games,” “workshopping,”
and “projecting feelings, concerns and issues,” we
also suggest some ways that the social construction issues
might be handled in the future. |
en_US |