Measuring values using best-worst scaling: The LOV example

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lee J en_US
dc.contributor.author Soutar Geoffrey en_US
dc.contributor.author Louviere Jordan en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-12-21T02:39:03Z
dc.date.available 2009-12-21T02:39:03Z
dc.date.issued 2001 en_US
dc.identifier 2006015358 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Lee J, Soutar Geoffrey, and Louviere Jordan 2007, 'Measuring values using best-worst scaling: The LOV example', John Wiley & Sons Inc, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1043-1058. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0742-6046 en_US
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/5545
dc.description.abstract The paper discusses the way that values have been measured and suggests an alternative way to collect values data. A recently developed approach, termed Best Worst Scaling, developed by Louviere and his colleagues, offers an opportunity to collect such data in a way that may produce more desirable values estimates. Kahle’s (1983) List of Values, which has been widely employed in consumer research, was used to examine differences between the new approach and traditional ratings and rankings approaches. The results suggest that the new technique may provide better outcomes and that researchers should think about its potential usefulness in future research with these and other scales. en_US
dc.publisher Marcel Dekker en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/STA-100106068 en_US
dc.title Measuring values using best-worst scaling: The LOV example en_US
dc.parent Psychology and Marketing en_US
dc.journal.volume 24 en_US
dc.journal.number 12 en_US
dc.publocation New York, USA en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 2149 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 2171 en_US
dc.cauo.name Mathematical Sciences en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record