| dc.contributor.author | Jones Glenn | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Savage Elizabeth | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-12-21T02:36:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2009-12-21T02:36:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2003 | en_US |
| dc.identifier | 2004000914 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Savage Elizabeth and Jones Glenn 2004, 'An analysis of the general practice access scheme on GP incomes, bulk billing and consumer copayments', Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 31-40. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0004 9018 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | C1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/5085 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In response to falling rates of bulk billing, in April 2003 the Australian Government proposed changes to the way that general practitioners (GPs) are reimbursed. It claimed that the General Practice Access Scheme (GPAS) would benefit all Australians by providing more affordable access to GP services and improved access 10free GP consultations for concession cardholders. This article examines the likely impacts of the GPAS, focusing on the proposed changes to bulk billing and payments to GPs. It examines the current spatial distribution of bulk billing and discusses how the package changes the incentives for GPs to charge patients and likely impacts. on GP income, patient copayments and bulk billing rates. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing | en_US |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-842X.00274 | en_US |
| dc.title | An analysis of the general practice access scheme on GP incomes, bulk billing and consumer copayments | en_US |
| dc.parent | The Australian Economic Review | en_US |
| dc.journal.volume | 37 | en_US |
| dc.journal.number | 1 | en_US |
| dc.publocation | Oxford, UK | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 181 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 194 | en_US |
| dc.cauo.name | Mathematical Sciences | en_US |