Are locally rare species abundant elsewhere in their geographical range?

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lepschi, Brendan en_US
dc.contributor.author Murray, Brad en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-12-21T02:30:05Z
dc.date.available 2009-12-21T02:30:05Z
dc.date.issued 2004 en_US
dc.identifier 2004000074 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Murray Brad and Lepschi Brendan 2004, 'Are locally rare species abundant elsewhere in their geographical range?', Blackwell Publishing Asia, vol. 29, pp. 287-293. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1442-9985 en_US
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/3748
dc.description.abstract Ecologists have long sought to understand why some species are rare and others common. For the most part, inconsistent relationships between local rarity and underlying mechanisms have emerged. One possibility for this inconsistency is that locally rare species may not always be rare. Howeverm it is largely unknown whether most locally rare species in a community possess the capacity to become abundant elsewhere in their geographical range. Here we identified 57 locally rare plant species of open forest in south-eastern Australia. We found that mopst o these species (91%)occurred in higher abundance at other sites within their geographical range 9somewhere-abundant species), while the remaining small percentage of locally rare species were consistently rare (everywhere sparse species). Somewhere-abundant species had significantly smaller seeds on average than everywhere-sparse species in cross-specis regression analysis. This pattern was not maintianed when the influence of other life-history attributes was controlled for, or when phylogenetic relatedness among species was considered explicitly in phylogenetic regression analysis. In both cross-species and phylogenetic regressions, somewhere-abundant and everywhere-sparse species did not differ significantly with respect to growth form, height, regeneration-after-fire strategy, or dispersal. Pur findings provide further evidence for the notion that theories to account for local rarity which are couched in terms of within-community interactions alone are incomplete for the majority of species, because they need to account for different outcomes in different places. en_US
dc.publisher Blackwell Publishing Asia en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01365.x en_US
dc.title Are locally rare species abundant elsewhere in their geographical range? en_US
dc.parent Austral Ecology en_US
dc.journal.volume 29 en_US
dc.journal.number en_US
dc.publocation Carlton en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 287 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 293 en_US
dc.cauo.name SCI.Environmental Sciences en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.for 060200 en_US
dc.personcode 010046 en_US
dc.personcode 0000021846 en_US
dc.percentage 100 en_US
dc.classification.name Ecology en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.description.keywords abundance, open forest, phylogenetic regression, rarity, seed size en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record