Walking the Thin Green Line: The Australian Experience of Corporate Environmental Reporting

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bubna-Litic Karen en_US
dc.contributor.author De Leeuw Lou en_US
dc.contributor.author Willamson Imelda en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-11-12T04:43:56Z
dc.date.available 2009-11-12T04:43:56Z
dc.date.issued 2001 en_US
dc.identifier 2004004408 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Bubna-Litic Karen, De Leeuw Lou, and Willamson Imelda 2001, 'Walking the Thin Green Line: The Australian Experience of Corporate Environmental Reporting', LBC, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 339-350. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0813-300X en_US
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/3245
dc.description.abstract Increasingly, Australian corporations are publicly reporting their environmental performance. Australia's Minister for the Environment and Heritage, Senator Robert Hill states that "the Government sees considerable value in greater public environmental reporting. It can help in meeting environmental accountability and community right-to-know concerns as well as generating significant business benefits to the reporting organisation. I am keen to see organisations of all sizes producing a public environmental report commensurate to their size and environmental impacts".¹ Over half of Australia's top 100 companies report their environmental performance in their annual reports or directors statements. Regulatory requirements, stakeholder's right-to-know, and community pressure are driving increased public environmental reporting (PER) among large Australian companies. The strong International and Australian growth in interest in socially responsible investments (SRI), and SRI funds will encourage wider, and more comprehensive reporting among publicly listed Australian companies. Five new Australian SRI funds are expected to be launched by December 2001. While these drivers are also encouraging small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), supply chain issues, the direct financial benefits the process of PER provides through reduced operating costs and better internal management of resources, and improved stakeholder relationships, are proving more influential reporting motivators. There have been two environmental reporting initiatives recently introduced into Australia. These are the mandatory reporting requirements under the Australian Corporations Law, and a voluntary reporting framework commissioned by the Federal Australian government. This article analyses the companies' performances pursuant to their first reporting year under the mandatory reporting requirements and discusses the drivers and barriers to environmental reporting among SMEs, describing, through two case studies, the environmental reporting experience of two SMEs. en_US
dc.publisher Law Book Company en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon en_US
dc.title Walking the Thin Green Line: The Australian Experience of Corporate Environmental Reporting en_US
dc.parent Environmental and Planning Law Journal en_US
dc.journal.volume 18 en_US
dc.journal.number 3 en_US
dc.publocation Sydney, Australia en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 339 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 350 en_US
dc.cauo.name Law en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record