Abstract:
Increasingly, Australian corporations are publicly
reporting their environmental performance.
Australia's Minister for the Environment and
Heritage, Senator Robert Hill states that "the
Government sees considerable value in greater
public environmental reporting. It can help in
meeting environmental accountability and
community right-to-know concerns as well as
generating significant business benefits to the
reporting organisation. I am keen to see
organisations of all sizes producing a public
environmental report commensurate to their size
and environmental impacts".¹
Over half of Australia's top 100 companies
report their environmental performance in their
annual reports or directors statements. Regulatory
requirements, stakeholder's right-to-know, and
community pressure are driving increased public
environmental reporting (PER) among large
Australian companies. The strong International and Australian growth in interest in socially responsible
investments (SRI), and SRI funds will encourage
wider, and more comprehensive reporting among
publicly listed Australian companies. Five new
Australian SRI funds are expected to be launched by
December 2001.
While these drivers are also encouraging small
and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), supply chain
issues, the direct financial benefits the process of
PER provides through reduced operating costs and
better internal management of resources, and
improved stakeholder relationships, are proving
more influential reporting motivators.
There have been two environmental reporting
initiatives recently introduced into Australia. These
are the mandatory reporting requirements under the
Australian Corporations Law, and a voluntary
reporting framework commissioned by the Federal
Australian government.
This article analyses the companies'
performances pursuant to their first reporting year
under the mandatory reporting requirements and
discusses the drivers and barriers to environmental
reporting among SMEs, describing, through two
case studies, the environmental reporting experience
of two SMEs.