| dc.contributor.author | Jarman Robert | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Willey Keith | en_US |
| dc.contributor.editor | Australian Technology Network of Universities (ATN) Teaching and Learning Committee | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-11-09T05:39:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2009-11-09T05:39:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.identifier | 2007000703 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Jarman Robert and Willey Keith 2007, 'Benchmarking Capstone Projects in UTS Faculty of Engineering', Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 45-57. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1 74107 135 6 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | E1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/3164 | |
| dc.description.abstract | UTS Faculty of Engineering capstone projects are undertaken in the final semester(s) of study and provide an opportunity for students to demonstrate a capacity to perform at the levels expected of a professional engineer. In many cases, students undertake projects in their workplace environment affording a rich context to integrate real world problems and solutions with academic rigour. The existing subject requirements have remained relatively unchanged for over 10 years; there is negligible evidence of the impact of its introduction and only anecdotal evidence of its effectiveness as a ‘capstone’ subject. Further, project supervisors have expressed their concern regarding a drop in quality of project work … and its assessment. Some students opt for ‘softer’ project topics, moderation of assessment criteria across faculty staff is problematic, and there is a lack of adequate evaluation (feedback) data from students to inform improvement strategy. As changes to subject requirements are being introduced in Spring 2007, a benchmarking exercise is timely. This paper will present the pertinent outcomes from a detailed evaluation undertaken by 85 capstone project students in Autumn semester 2007. Students were asked to self evaluate on a 0–5 scale the ‘applicability’ and their ‘capacity to demonstrate in their project work’ each of 61 competency indicators chosen from Engineers Australia ‘Stage 1 Competency Standards’. The outcomes will serve as a valuable guide for areas of improvement, as well as a benchmark against which future change can be measured. | en_us |
| dc.publisher | Queensland University of Technology | en_US |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | http://www.eac2007.qut.edu.au/program/Jarman_abstract.pdf | en_US |
| dc.title | Benchmarking Capstone Projects in UTS Faculty of Engineering | en_US |
| dc.parent | ATN Evaluation and Assessment Conference: Assessment and Evaluation for Real World Learning | en_US |
| dc.journal.volume | en_US | |
| dc.journal.number | en_US | |
| dc.publocation | Brisbane, Australia | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 45 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 57 | en_US |
| dc.cauo.name | Management, Policy and Practice | en_US |
| dc.conference | ATN Evaluation and Assessment Conference: Assessment and Evaluation for Real World Learning | en_US |
| dc.conference.location | Brisbane, Australia | en_US |