The size, cost, asset allocation and audit attributes of Australian self-managed superannnuation funds

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Raftery, Adrian Michael
dc.date.accessioned 2014-06-15T05:39:35Z
dc.date.available 2014-06-15T05:39:35Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/28062
dc.description University of Technology, Sydney. UTS Business School. en_US
dc.description.abstract Using proprietary Australian Tax Office (ATO) data, this thesis documents the size, asset allocation and expenses incurred for a large sample of Australian self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) for the three fiscal years to June 2010. Further, it examines auditor industry specialisation, professional brand effects and auditor independence implications in the SMSF market. The analysis provides new insights into the fastest growing and largest segment of the Australian $1.8 trillion retirement savings industry by complementing and extending prior superannuation studies of both small and large APRA funds to SMSFs. Two recent Government reviews have highlighted a lack of basic descriptive knowledge of the costs associated with running an SMSF. As a result, I develop an SMSF Costs Matrix - across five different model portfolios - to assist gaining a greater understanding of the annual operating costs of an SMSF in accordance with its investment strategy. As expected, I observe that SMSFs enjoy economies of scale in relation to running costs, with the annual median cost being approximately half those of industry and retail funds. I estimate that the relatively low-cost structure of SMSFs may have a positive impact on the final retirement balance for a model portfolio when compared with the fees of two other types of superannuation funds. In terms of economics of auditing implications, when I consider the impact of industry specialisation, after controlling for factors known to determine audit fees, I find evidence of fee discounting by the leading suppliers of SMSF audits. This finding is consistent with Simunic (1980)’s assertion of competition in the small audit client market. However, when the dependent variable is redefined to the total ‘bundle’ of services (including audit and non-audit fees), most industry leaders are shown to earn a fee premium. This finding suggests that industry specialists price strategically and use audits as a conduit to supply higher margin non-audit services (NAS). In terms of auditor independence, the supply of NAS is shown to improve the auditors’ ability to report breaches, suggesting no independence concerns arising from joint supply of audit and NAS. Last, I find evidence of audit fee premiums for auditors with higher quality professional affiliations who are required to comply with auditing and ethical standards. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title The size, cost, asset allocation and audit attributes of Australian self-managed superannnuation funds en_US
dc.type Thesis (PhD) en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record