Evaluation of blended learning: analysis of qualitative data

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Harding, Ansie en_US
dc.contributor.author Kaczynski, Dan en_US
dc.contributor.author Wood, Leigh en_US
dc.contributor.editor Johnston, I en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-11-09T02:47:22Z
dc.date.available 2009-11-09T02:47:22Z
dc.date.issued 2005 en_US
dc.identifier 2005001940 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Harding Ansie, Kaczynski Dan, and Wood Leigh 2005, 'Evaluation of blended learning: analysis of qualitative data', Australian Associate for Research in Education, Sydney, Australia, pp. 56-62. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1 86487 744 8 en_US
dc.identifier.other E1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/2170
dc.description.abstract When we implement changed in learning, such as blended learning, we wish to judge the impact of the reform. Evaluation is a process by which we make judgements about the worth of an educational deveopment. The difference in learning is subtle and deep and may be unexpected by those implementing the changes. Ways to explore these deep processsesin learning include interviews, observations and open-ended questionnaires targeting all concerned in the process such as students, teaching, administration and technical staff. This generates a mass of qualitative data that may are unaccumstomed to analysing. This paper will discuss the process of evaluation; give an example of evaluation and show how to analyse qualitative data. We will discuss the use of the software tool NVivo to assist with the analysis. Papers that use results f qualitative analysis of student learning in methematics and statistics include Petocz and Reid, (2001); Petocz and Reid, (2003); Reid, Petocz, Smith Wood and Dortins(2003). These papers show that students in classes have qualitatively different ways of experiencing mathematics and statistics and that this affects their learning. Kaczynski and Kelly (2004) describe a course that incorporates qualitative methodologies and analysis. en_US
dc.publisher Australian Associate for Research in Education en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon Peat, M. en_US
dc.title Evaluation of blended learning: analysis of qualitative data en_US
dc.parent Blended Learning in Science Teaching and Leaning en_US
dc.journal.volume en_US
dc.journal.number en_US
dc.publocation Sydney, Australia en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 56 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 62 en_US
dc.cauo.name SCI.Mathematical Sciences en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.conference.location Parramatta, Australia en_US
dc.for 170110 en_US
dc.personcode 0000025725 en_US
dc.personcode 995553 en_US
dc.personcode 890503 en_US
dc.percentage 50 en_US
dc.classification.name Psychological Methodology, Design and Analysis en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.custom Symposium of Blended Learning in Science Teaching & Learning en_US
dc.date.activity 20050928 en_US
dc.location.activity Parramatta, Australia en_US
dc.staffid 890503 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record