The dynamics of alignment : resolving strategy ambiguity within bounded choices

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Campbell, Bruce
dc.date.accessioned 2008-11-10T00:07:16Z
dc.date.accessioned 2012-12-15T03:52:19Z
dc.date.available 2008-11-10T00:07:16Z
dc.date.available 2012-12-15T03:52:19Z
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2100/650
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/20129
dc.description.abstract Alignment of information systems (IS) with business activities has been an important problem for practitioners for many years even though there has been considerable research in the area. A criticism of some past research into IS/business alignment is that it has ignored organisational complexity and context. This is partly due to the dominant paradigm in use within IS research. One result of this paradigm is that there are numerous prescriptions provided in the literature for improving alignment but little in the way of theory development that explains the behaviour of practitioners when confronted with the task of attaining alignment. To address these criticisms a grounded theory approach was adopted using a coding family that encouraged the discovery of systems of interaction between variables rather than assuming linear causality. Data was collected via three unstructured focus groups that limited the effect of prior reading of the literature, an important consideration when conducting a grounded theory study. These were followed by semi-structured individual interviews. The instruments for the latter were developed after the focus group interviews were analysed, so reducing the impact of a prior reading. Analysis of the focus group interviews found that the major concern of practitioners was aligning IS strategies to either business strategies documented in business plans or the business strategies in use. This is a similar result to earlier alignment research. As a result of analysis of the focus group interviews the research question stabilised. This research investigated how factors within an organisational setting impact the ability of senior IT managers to identify, then act upon, the business strategies in use. It confirmed many of the enablers and inhibitors to alignment identified in earlier research. However, it also identified two variables that are rarely given prominence in the literature: the mental models held by managers; and the motivation and measurement schemes applied to managers. It is believed that both these variables have a significant impact on the alignment of IS and business strategies. The theory developed here demonstrates that a system of variables will tend to encourage IT managers to either collaborate with their business peers, or retreat from the business and concentrate on providing a low cost reliable technical IT solution. In the former situation alignment of IT managers’ actions to those of their business peers is encouraged. In the latter situation there will be little alignment between business and IS strategies nor between the actions of business and IT managers. A feedback loop of actions by actors within the system tends to reinforce the situation making a change in response extremely problematic. This, then, helps explain the intractable nature of alignment that has been observed for many years. en_AU
dc.language.iso en en_AU
dc.subject Information technology en_AU
dc.subject Information systems en_AU
dc.subject Grounded theory en_AU
dc.subject Management information systems en_AU
dc.title The dynamics of alignment : resolving strategy ambiguity within bounded choices en_AU
dc.type Thesis (Ph.D.) en_AU


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record