An investigation into the cycle and prediction of organisation facility management procurement

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Luciani, Paul James
dc.date.accessioned 2008-05-19T02:41:13Z
dc.date.accessioned 2012-12-15T03:51:57Z
dc.date.available 2008-05-19T02:41:13Z
dc.date.available 2012-12-15T03:51:57Z
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2100/546
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/20076
dc.description University of Technology, Sydney. Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building. en_AU
dc.description.abstract Note: Thesis restricted to on campus access. Facility Management (FM) is an emerging industry in Australia and in various nations throughout the world. The annual Australian national investment of the FM industry contributes approximately 4% to GDP and there are more than 404,000 people working in FM service industries. Some conjecture exists to whether or not FM is a discipline in its own right. However, a review of FM history reveals its existence embedded within various organisational operating environments, however, under differing labels. The creation of an acceptable global FM definition is yet to be achieved. The procuring and delivering of FM services is an activity that is predominantly managed from inside an organisation through direct employment (in-house), or by others outside the organisation (outsourcing). The latter has gained considerable popularity of late, yet it is argued that it remains an ill-defined term, resulting in its possible incorrect application to the FM function. Further, there has been some suggestion as to the existence of indiscriminate cycling through these two main forms of FM procurement and delivery methods by organisations that has attracted some debate. Limited research has been performed on the dynamics associated with the decision to manage FM in-house or to outsource the function. It is argued that on a medium to long-term basis there may exist an inadequacy in identifying and associating the drivers of value and costs, as they are perceived by organizations, for the two main procurement and delivery methods of FM. By researching organisational operating environments it was found that in-house and outsourced methods may have different cost and value drivers. Further, each method, under certain conditions, was found to produce a different set of percieved value and costs, seemingly independent from each other. Also, these operating environments seemed to change over time, influencing the percieved FM value and cost levels. This apparent link with organisational operating environments and perceived FM procurement and delivery value and cost suggests that neither method may be regarded as a permanent solution. Thus, under certain conditions, the dynamic alteration of outsourcing levels during these changes in organisational operating environments may capture this value for longer periods of time, whilst minimising the costs associated with FM procurement and delivery. en_AU
dc.language.iso en en_AU
dc.subject Facility management en_AU
dc.subject Outsourcing en_AU
dc.title An investigation into the cycle and prediction of organisation facility management procurement en_AU
dc.type Thesis (Ph.D.) en_AU


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record