Safe timing for an urgent Caesarean section: what is the evidence to guide policy?

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Homer Caroline en_US
dc.contributor.author Catling-Paull Christine en_US
dc.contributor.editor en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-10-12T03:34:17Z
dc.date.available 2012-10-12T03:34:17Z
dc.date.issued 2012 en_US
dc.identifier 2011006189 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Homer Caroline and Catling-Paull Christine 2012, 'Safe timing for an urgent Caesarean section: what is the evidence to guide policy?', Australian Healthcare Association, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 277-281. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0156-5788 en_US
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/18489
dc.description.abstract To determine, from the evidence, what is the optimum decision to delivery (DDI) intervals in emergency Caesarean sections (CS). The aim of the study was to help guide policy in maternity services and identify issues relating to DDI and safe practice in maternity care. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Assessment of the quality of eligible papers was undertaken using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) rating. There is no strong evidence that a DDI of 30 min or less is associated with improved outcomes for babies or mothers. Some evidence suggests that a DDI of greater than 30 min but less than 75 min confers benefit, but these findings were confounded by the indications for the emergency CS. Urgent CS should occur as soon as possible, but there is insufficient evidence to support a definite time frame, such as 30 min. A consistency of approach and nomenclature in describing the urgency of CS is necessary, which would enable criteria for further audit regarding DDI. Staff training should be addressed to improve transfer systems for CS. Antenatal risk assessment and congruence with role delineation and service delivery capacity is important. en_US
dc.language en_US
dc.publisher Australian Healthcare Association en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon en_US
dc.title Safe timing for an urgent Caesarean section: what is the evidence to guide policy? en_US
dc.parent Australian Health Review en_US
dc.journal.volume 36 en_US
dc.journal.number 3 en_US
dc.publocation Canberra en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 277 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 281 en_US
dc.cauo.name FOH.Faculty of Health en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.for 111000 en_US
dc.personcode 995146;995204 en_US
dc.percentage 000034 en_US
dc.classification.name Nursing en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.edition en_US
dc.custom en_US
dc.date.activity en_US
dc.location.activity en_US
dc.description.keywords en_US
dc.staffid en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record