Mainstreaming the doctoral research portfolio?

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lee, Alison en_US
dc.contributor.author Clerke, Teena en_US
dc.contributor.editor M. Kiley and G. Mullens en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-12T11:24:14Z
dc.date.available 2012-03-12T11:24:14Z
dc.date.issued 2008 en_US
dc.identifier 2006014821 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Clerke Christeena and Lee Alison 2008, 'Mainstreaming the doctoral research portfolio?', , Quality in Postgraduate Research, Adelaide, Australia, , pp. 17-30. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 978-0-731-4640-4 en_US
dc.identifier.other E1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/17581
dc.description.abstract The doctoral research portfolio has come to be considered a viable form of doctoral output in a graduate education field that has experienced spectacular growth and diversification since the early 1990s. It is often argued that, as a flexible form of doctoral production, the portfolio has the potential to evidence both textual products and graduate capabilities due to its capacity to accommodate a range of media forms and delivery contexts that address various scholarly and professional practice communities. At the same time, uptake of the portfolio in different doctoral programs has been more limited than the rhetoric of diversification might suggest and has remained largely confined to creative arts and other professional doctorate programs. It has also not been well documented in the "mainstream" literature on doctoral education. This paper argues that the idea of the portfolio is complex and difficult to implement. At the same time, pressures on the doctorate in terms of outcomes increasingly suggest a direction towards opening up the doctorate to embrace an increasing diversity of forms of production. Within this context the portfolio as an idea may become more useful in directing attention to more creative conceptualisations of the ways in which students may evidence doctoral quality. en_US
dc.language en_US
dc.publisher Quality in Postgraduate Research en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon http://www.qpr.edu.au/2008/qpr2008.pdf en_US
dc.title Mainstreaming the doctoral research portfolio? en_US
dc.parent Conference Proceedings of 8th Quality in Postgraduate Research Conference: Research Education in the New Global Environment en_US
dc.journal.volume en_US
dc.journal.number en_US
dc.publocation Adelaide, Australia en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 17 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 30 en_US
dc.cauo.name FASS.Education Group en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.for 160512 en_US
dc.personcode 102563 en_US
dc.personcode 930409 en_US
dc.percentage 34 en_US
dc.classification.name Social Policy en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.edition en_US
dc.custom Quality in Postgraduate Research Conference en_US
dc.date.activity 20070417 en_US
dc.location.activity Adelaide, Australia en_US
dc.description.keywords doctoral research, professional doctorate, portfolio, doctoral education, doctoral output en_US
dc.staffid en_US
dc.staffid 930409 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record