Is absolute identification always relative? Comment on Stewart, Brown, and Chater (2005)

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Brown, S en_US
dc.contributor.author Marley, Anthony en_US
dc.contributor.author Lacouture, Y en_US
dc.contributor.editor en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-02-02T11:14:34Z
dc.date.available 2012-02-02T11:14:34Z
dc.date.issued 2007 en_US
dc.identifier 2010000428 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Brown S, Marley Anthony, and Lacouture Y 2007, 'Is absolute identification always relative? Comment on Stewart, Brown, and Chater (2005)', Psychological Review, American Psychological Association, US en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0033-295X en_US
dc.identifier.other C4 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/16853
dc.description.abstract N. Stewart, G. D. A. Brown, and N. Chater's (2005) relative judgment model includes three core assumptions that enable it to predict accurately the vast majority of ?classical? phenomena in absolute identification choices, but not the time taken to make them, including sequential effects, such as assimilation and contrast. These core assumptions, coupled with the parameter values used in the above-mentioned article, lead to the prediction that identification accuracy is low when a large stimulus on 1 trial is followed by a small stimulus on the next trial and vice versa. Data do not support this prediction. The authors identify a set of parameters that allow the model to better fit the data, but problems remain when the data are analyzed with a version of the discrimination measure (d') from signal detection theory. The fundamental problem is that the model fits data on average but at the expense of making incorrect predictions in detail. en_US
dc.language en_US
dc.publisher American Psychological Association en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.528 en_US
dc.title Is absolute identification always relative? Comment on Stewart, Brown, and Chater (2005) en_US
dc.parent Psychological Review en_US
dc.journal.volume 114 en_US
dc.journal.number 2 en_US
dc.publocation US en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 528 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 532 en_US
dc.cauo.name BUS.Faculty of Business en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.for 170100 en_US
dc.personcode 0000065124 en_US
dc.personcode 102475 en_US
dc.personcode 0000065142 en_US
dc.percentage 100 en_US
dc.classification.name Psychology en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.edition en_US
dc.custom en_US
dc.date.activity en_US
dc.location.activity en_US
dc.description.keywords absolute identification, relative judgment theory, sequential effects en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record