An empirical investigation of the ethics position questionnaire in the People's Republic of China

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Redfern Kylie en_US
dc.contributor.author Crawford John en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-08-20T14:37:15Z
dc.date.available 2009-08-20T14:37:15Z
dc.date.issued 2004 en_US
dc.identifier 2004000134 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Redfern Kylie and Crawford John 2004, 'An empirical investigation of the ethics position questionnaire in the People's Republic of China', Kluwer Academic Publ, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 199-210. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0167-4544 en_US
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/1562
dc.description.abstract While many studies have investigated the ethical perceptions, ideologies and value systems of the Chinese, few studies have focused on mainland China, and even fewer have examined regional differences within China. This study examines the factor structure of Forsyth’s (1980) Ethics Position Questionnaire in a sample of managers from the PRC. According to Forsyth, individual differences in Relativism and Idealism influence judgements of moral issues (Forsyth, 1980). In a sample of 115 managers, results show that two similar constructs to those described by Forsyth do exist in the Chinese sample. However the precise interpretation of the item groupings through a Chinese perspective, may reveal some discrete areas of difference in the labelling of these constructs. The study also finds that managers in the South of China scored significantly higher in “Idealism” than managers in the North. Results are presented and implications for future research are discussed. en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000024741.85399.0d en_US
dc.title An empirical investigation of the ethics position questionnaire in the People's Republic of China en_US
dc.parent Journal of Business Ethics en_US
dc.journal.volume 50 en_US
dc.journal.number 3 en_US
dc.publocation Dordrecht en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 199 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 210 en_US
dc.cauo.name Management en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record