The carbon balance of European croplands: a cross-site comparison of simulation models

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research

Advanced Search


My Account

Show simple item record Wattenbach, M en_US Sus, Oliver en_US Vuichard, N en_US Lehuger, S en_US Gottschalk, Pia en_US Li, Longhui en_US Leip, Adrian en_US Williams, Mathew en_US Tomelleri, Enrico en_US Kutsch, Werner en_US Buchmann, Nina en_US Eugster, Werner en_US Dietiker, Dominique en_US Aubinet, Marc en_US Ceschia, E. en_US B'Eziat, P en_US Grunwald, Thomas en_US Hastings, Astley en_US Osborne, Bruce en_US Ciais, P. en_US Cellier, P en_US Smith, Peter en_US
dc.contributor.editor en_US 2012-02-02T08:47:56Z 2012-02-02T08:47:56Z 2010 en_US
dc.identifier 2010004016 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Wattenbach M et al. 2010, 'The carbon balance of European croplands: a cross-site comparison of simulation models', Elsevier BV, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 419-453. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0167-8809 en_US
dc.identifier.other C1UNSUBMIT en_US
dc.description.abstract Croplands cover approximately 45% of Europe and play an important role in the overall carbon budget of the continent. However, the estimation of their carbon balance remains uncertain due to the diversity of crops and cropping systems together with the strong influence of human management. Here, we present a multi-site model comparison for four cropland ecosystem models namely theDNDC,ORCHIDEESTICS, CERES-EGC and SPA models. We compare the accuracy of the models in predicting net ecosystem exchange (NEE), gross primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Reco) as well as actual evapotranspiration (ETa) for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) derived from eddy covariance measurements on five sites along a gradient of climatic conditions from eastern to southwesterly Europe. The models are all able to simulate daily GPP. The simulation results for daily ETa and Reco are, however, less accurate. The resulting simulation of daily NEE is adequate except in some cases where models fail due to a lack in phase and amplitude alignment. ORCHIDEE-STICS and SPAshowthe best performance. Nevertheless, they are not able to simulate full crop rotations or the multiple management practices used. CERES-EGC, and especially DNDC, although exhibiting a lower level of model accuracy, are able to simulate such conditions, resulting in more accurate simulation of annual cumulative NEE. en_US
dc.language en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier BV en_US
dc.title The carbon balance of European croplands: a cross-site comparison of simulation models en_US
dc.parent Agricultural, Ecosystem and Environment en_US
dc.journal.volume 139 en_US
dc.journal.number 3 en_US
dc.publocation Netherlands en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 419 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 453 en_US SCI.Plant Functional Biology & Climate Change en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.for 050200 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069214 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069227 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069210 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069217 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069228 en_US
dc.personcode 109705 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069229 en_US
dc.personcode 0000020564 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069230 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069231 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069232 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069233 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069234 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069235 en_US
dc.personcode 0000060761 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069215 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069236 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069237 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069238 en_US
dc.personcode 0000060971 en_US
dc.personcode 0000058923 en_US
dc.personcode 0000069239 en_US
dc.percentage 100 en_US Environmental Science and Management en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.edition en_US
dc.custom en_US en_US
dc.location.activity en_US
dc.description.keywords Cropland, Crop, Eddy flux, Carbon, CO2, Modelling en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record