Are gamblers really risk takers

UTSePress Research/Manakin Repository

Search UTSePress Research


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bird, Ronald en_US
dc.contributor.author Mccrae, M en_US
dc.contributor.author Beggs, J en_US
dc.contributor.editor en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-02-07T06:26:06Z
dc.date.available 2011-02-07T06:26:06Z
dc.date.issued 1987 en_US
dc.identifier 2006014927 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Bird Ronald, Mccrae M, and Beggs J 1987, 'Are gamblers really risk takers', Australian Economic Papers, vol. 26, no. 49, pp. 237-253. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0004-900X en_US
dc.identifier.other C1UNSUBMIT en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/13929
dc.description.abstract This paper examines the attitudes of gamblers to risk as displayed by their betting behaviour on horse races. Although traditional economic theory assumes that individuals are averse to risk, numerous authors (e.g. Ali 1977; Asch, Malkiel and Quandt 1982; Snyder 1978 and Weitzman 1965) have produced empirical evidence to suggest that gamblers are in fact risk takers. This paper presents empirical evidence not inconsistent with these previous findings but proceeds to put a different interpretation on the results. In particular, we extend the traditional two moment utility model to include skewness. Arditti and others (Arditti 1967, 1971) have suggested that well-informed risk-averse equity investors should prefer positively skewed return distributions. Although the importance of positive skewness to these investors has been questioned (Francis 1975), we find that it is a characteristic that is strongly favoured by those who gamble on race horses. However, the introduction of skewness cannot alone explain another trait of these gamblers ? their willingness to participate m an activity which promises a negative return. In Section II we describe the data collection procedures and the method used in this study. The results reported in Section III are consistent with those in previous studies which concluded that gamblers are risk-takers. In Section IV the discussion of these results is extended to include skewness. The issue of why gamblers participate in a negative return activity is addressed in Section V. We conclude with a brief summary of our principal findings. en_US
dc.language en_US
dc.publisher Australian Economic Papers en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon NA en_US
dc.title Are gamblers really risk takers en_US
dc.parent Australian Economic Papers en_US
dc.journal.volume 26 en_US
dc.journal.number 49 en_US
dc.publocation Adelaide en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 237 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 253 en_US
dc.cauo.name BUS.School of Finance and Economics en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.for 140200 en_US
dc.personcode 981118 en_US
dc.personcode 0000035548 en_US
dc.personcode 0000035547 en_US
dc.percentage 100 en_US
dc.classification.name Applied Economics en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.edition en_US
dc.custom en_US
dc.date.activity en_US
dc.location.activity ISI:A1987N166200007 en_US
dc.description.keywords NA en_US
dc.staffid en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record